The radiation therapist’s role in real-time EPI interpretation and decision-making

Jennifer Cox, Yobelli Jimenez
{"title":"The radiation therapist’s role in real-time EPI interpretation and decision-making","authors":"Jennifer Cox,&nbsp;Yobelli Jimenez","doi":"10.1016/j.ejradi.2010.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine whether radiation therapists (RTT) can correctly identify field placement errors and recommend appropriate isocentre<span> moves using electronic portal imaging.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review<span><span> of the literature was made using the keywords: “radiation therapy OR radiotherapy AND electronic portal imaging”; radiation therapist OR radiographer OR </span>radiologic technologist AND electronic portal imaging”; “electronic portal imaging”; “verification AND electronic portal imaging”; “verification AND radiation therapist”; “verification films”; “image approval”; “radiation therapist AND role expansion”; and “radiation therapist experience”.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Eighteen relevant articles were found. These were collated into three topic areas: 1) current practice, 2) ability to assess EPIs, and 3) experience/education needed. It is common practice for RTTs to review EPIs in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Education is carried out in the clinic. Concordance between RTTs and radiation oncologists (ROs) in error detection and iso-move decisions was between 90.1% and 97.3%. RTT inter-observer variability was 0.7–1.4</span> <!-->mm and intra-observer variability was 0.4–0.7<!--> <!-->mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RTTs provide acceptable alternatives to ROs for rapid review of EPIs, enabling prompt corrections to be made with the patient on the treatment couch. It is recommended that RTTs take on this role, using an internal accrediting program and ongoing continual professional education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100505,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiography","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 139-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2010.04.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117510000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether radiation therapists (RTT) can correctly identify field placement errors and recommend appropriate isocentre moves using electronic portal imaging.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was made using the keywords: “radiation therapy OR radiotherapy AND electronic portal imaging”; radiation therapist OR radiographer OR radiologic technologist AND electronic portal imaging”; “electronic portal imaging”; “verification AND electronic portal imaging”; “verification AND radiation therapist”; “verification films”; “image approval”; “radiation therapist AND role expansion”; and “radiation therapist experience”.

Results

Eighteen relevant articles were found. These were collated into three topic areas: 1) current practice, 2) ability to assess EPIs, and 3) experience/education needed. It is common practice for RTTs to review EPIs in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Education is carried out in the clinic. Concordance between RTTs and radiation oncologists (ROs) in error detection and iso-move decisions was between 90.1% and 97.3%. RTT inter-observer variability was 0.7–1.4 mm and intra-observer variability was 0.4–0.7 mm.

Conclusions

RTTs provide acceptable alternatives to ROs for rapid review of EPIs, enabling prompt corrections to be made with the patient on the treatment couch. It is recommended that RTTs take on this role, using an internal accrediting program and ongoing continual professional education.

放射治疗师在实时EPI解释和决策中的作用
目的确定放射治疗师(RTT)是否能够正确识别野位置错误,并使用电子门静脉成像推荐适当的等心移动。方法以“放射治疗或放疗与电子门静脉成像”为关键词,对相关文献进行系统回顾;放射治疗师或放射技师或放射技术专家和电子门静脉成像”;“电子门静脉成像”;“验证和电子门户成像”;“验证和放射治疗师”;“验证电影”;“批准”形象;“放射治疗师与角色拓展”;还有“放射治疗经验”。结果共检索到相关文献18篇。这些被整理成三个主题领域:1)当前的实践,2)评估epi的能力,以及3)所需的经验/教育。在加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰,rtt审查EPIs是常见的做法。教育是在诊所进行的。rtt与放射肿瘤学家(ROs)在错误检测和等移决策方面的一致性在90.1%至97.3%之间。RTT观察者间变异性为0.7-1.4 mm,观察者内变异性为0.4-0.7 mm。结论srtt为快速评估epi提供了可接受的替代方案,能够在患者躺在治疗台上时及时纠正。建议rtt承担这一角色,使用内部认证程序和持续的专业教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信