Patients' perception and satisfaction with apicoectomy

Euiseong Kim, Seung‐Jong Lee, Jeong-Won Park, S. Shin
{"title":"Patients' perception and satisfaction with apicoectomy","authors":"Euiseong Kim, Seung‐Jong Lee, Jeong-Won Park, S. Shin","doi":"10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study was aimed to examine the patients’perception and satisfaction with the results of endodontic microsurgery which was apicoectomy with retrofilling. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was given to 109 patients, who were recalled after a minimum of 3 months upon endodontic microsurgery in the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Yonsei University. A contingency table and correlation analysis were used to determine if there were any correlations between age/gender and the patients’responses ( p = 0.05). Results: Approximately 60% of respondents answered they had never heard of surgical endodontic procedures. 63.3% of respondents chose the surgical option because they wanted to keep their natural teeth. If the patient required the same procedure on another tooth later, 100 out of 109 respondents answered they would choose microsurgery instead of extraction. Most patients (82.57%) appeared to be satisfied with the surgical procedure. Conclusions: Endodontic microsurgery consisting of apicoectomy and retrofilling seems to appeal to majority of patients as a satisfactory and valuable treatment choice. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2011;36(2):114-118.]","PeriodicalId":21126,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.2.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was aimed to examine the patients’perception and satisfaction with the results of endodontic microsurgery which was apicoectomy with retrofilling. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was given to 109 patients, who were recalled after a minimum of 3 months upon endodontic microsurgery in the Department of Conservative Dentistry, Yonsei University. A contingency table and correlation analysis were used to determine if there were any correlations between age/gender and the patients’responses ( p = 0.05). Results: Approximately 60% of respondents answered they had never heard of surgical endodontic procedures. 63.3% of respondents chose the surgical option because they wanted to keep their natural teeth. If the patient required the same procedure on another tooth later, 100 out of 109 respondents answered they would choose microsurgery instead of extraction. Most patients (82.57%) appeared to be satisfied with the surgical procedure. Conclusions: Endodontic microsurgery consisting of apicoectomy and retrofilling seems to appeal to majority of patients as a satisfactory and valuable treatment choice. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2011;36(2):114-118.]
患者对根尖切除术的认知和满意度
目的:探讨根管显微手术根尖切除后补牙的效果。材料与方法:对109例患者进行问卷调查,这些患者在接受牙髓显微手术至少3个月后被延世大学保守牙科学系召回。采用列联表和相关分析确定年龄/性别与患者反应是否存在相关性(p = 0.05)。结果:大约60%的受访者回答他们从未听说过牙髓手术。63.3%的受访者选择手术的原因是他们想保留自己的原牙。109名应答者中有100人回答说,如果患者以后需要在另一颗牙齿上进行同样的手术,他们会选择显微手术而不是拔牙。大多数患者(82.57%)对手术满意。结论:根管显微手术包括根尖切除术和补牙术,是一种令人满意和有价值的治疗选择,对大多数患者具有吸引力。[J] .中国医学工程学报,2011;36(2):114-118。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信