Comparison of Low Dose Albumin Versus Full Dose Albumin in Improving Refractory Ascites in Cirrhotic Patients

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maaz Ahmed, Zafar Niaz, S. Mumtaz, S. Lodhi, Aneeza Munir, S. Abaidullah
{"title":"Comparison of Low Dose Albumin Versus Full Dose Albumin in Improving Refractory Ascites in Cirrhotic Patients","authors":"Maaz Ahmed, Zafar Niaz, S. Mumtaz, S. Lodhi, Aneeza Munir, S. Abaidullah","doi":"10.21649/akemu.v28i1.5015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Refractory ascites is one of the most important complications of cirrhosis & albumin is considered highly effective in controlling it. Objective: To compare efficacy of 10g albumin versus 20g albumin in improving refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients. \nMethods: This randomized control trial was conducted at department of Gastroenterology, Mayo hospital Lahore for 12 months. After ethical approval, 60 patients of chronic liver disease with refractory ascites were included in the study & were divided into two groups. Group A was administered with 20g albumin whereas; group B was given 10g albumin. Both groups were followed for next 3 days by measuring change in weight, abdominal girth and urine output. Data was analyzed by using SPSS v-21. Results: There was no considerable difference between two groups regarding change in weight, abdominal girth and urine output. There was no significant difference in albumin response for both the groups in reducing ascites (p=0.6022). Conclusion: Low dose albumin is as effective as full dose albumin for reducing refractory ascites among cirrhotic patients. \n","PeriodicalId":43918,"journal":{"name":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v28i1.5015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Refractory ascites is one of the most important complications of cirrhosis & albumin is considered highly effective in controlling it. Objective: To compare efficacy of 10g albumin versus 20g albumin in improving refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at department of Gastroenterology, Mayo hospital Lahore for 12 months. After ethical approval, 60 patients of chronic liver disease with refractory ascites were included in the study & were divided into two groups. Group A was administered with 20g albumin whereas; group B was given 10g albumin. Both groups were followed for next 3 days by measuring change in weight, abdominal girth and urine output. Data was analyzed by using SPSS v-21. Results: There was no considerable difference between two groups regarding change in weight, abdominal girth and urine output. There was no significant difference in albumin response for both the groups in reducing ascites (p=0.6022). Conclusion: Low dose albumin is as effective as full dose albumin for reducing refractory ascites among cirrhotic patients.
低剂量白蛋白与全剂量白蛋白改善肝硬化难治性腹水的比较
背景:顽固性腹水是肝硬化最重要的并发症之一,白蛋白被认为对其控制非常有效。目的:比较10g白蛋白与20g白蛋白治疗肝硬化难治性腹水的疗效。方法:在拉合尔梅奥医院消化内科进行为期12个月的随机对照试验。经伦理批准,将60例慢性肝病合并难治性腹水患者纳入研究,并分为两组。A组给予白蛋白20g;B组给予白蛋白10g。两组随访3 d,测量体重、腹围、尿量变化。数据分析采用SPSS v-21软件。结果:两组患者的体重、腹围和尿量变化无显著差异。两组在减少腹水方面的白蛋白反应无显著差异(p=0.6022)。结论:低剂量白蛋白治疗肝硬化难治性腹水与全剂量白蛋白治疗效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信