"Inclusive entrepreneurship: A critical look at the inclusion of persons with disabilities"

J. Rolle, J. Kisato, P. Rock, Jacqueline Winstanley, United Kingdom Universal Inclusion
{"title":"\"Inclusive entrepreneurship: A critical look at the inclusion of persons with disabilities\"","authors":"J. Rolle, J. Kisato, P. Rock, Jacqueline Winstanley, United Kingdom Universal Inclusion","doi":"10.24052/IJBED/V08N02/ART-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been many definitions of inclusion as it relates to the underserved and economic empowerment through entrepreneurship, but few of these definitions have focused specifically on persons with disabilities. Purpose of Research- Many studies have looked at increasing economic empowerment through entrepreneurship for women, minorities, youth, seniors, immigrants, and rural residents throughout literature. The gap is, however, the lumping of all these categories has led to overlooking of specific challenges faced by persons with disabilities. This oversight on economic inclusivity has been magnified especially during the Coronavirus pandemic. Design/ Methodology- This study reviews literature in search of evidence to document programs, projects, and policies used in both developed and developing countries to address the overall challenges of inclusive entrepreneurship. The paper explores several entrepreneurial studies on the inclusivity of business ecosystems in the UK, USA, Sub-Saharan Africa, and India. It highlights public-private partnerships and impact investment as it relates to challenges in increasing inclusivity in businesses. Results/Findings- It was evident that there are many government policies and programs to support entrepreneurship in the USA, UK, Sub-Saharan Africa, and India, but limited empirical studies have been documented to evaluate the impact of these policies on entrepreneurship for persons with disabilities. Some of the challenges cited in the literature included gender gap, cost of doing business, and the likelihood to be funded to launch a business as common dominant factors reported on the issue of inclusion. Practical implications and Conclusions-The authors find that there are much more empirical research and analyses warranted in the study of entrepreneurship inclusion and empowerment of the underserved, especially for persons with disabilities. A continue reviewing literature and use quantitative and qualitative research such that additional programs, projects, and policies may be developed to serve all inclusively.","PeriodicalId":30779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Economic Development","volume":"78 1-2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/IJBED/V08N02/ART-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There have been many definitions of inclusion as it relates to the underserved and economic empowerment through entrepreneurship, but few of these definitions have focused specifically on persons with disabilities. Purpose of Research- Many studies have looked at increasing economic empowerment through entrepreneurship for women, minorities, youth, seniors, immigrants, and rural residents throughout literature. The gap is, however, the lumping of all these categories has led to overlooking of specific challenges faced by persons with disabilities. This oversight on economic inclusivity has been magnified especially during the Coronavirus pandemic. Design/ Methodology- This study reviews literature in search of evidence to document programs, projects, and policies used in both developed and developing countries to address the overall challenges of inclusive entrepreneurship. The paper explores several entrepreneurial studies on the inclusivity of business ecosystems in the UK, USA, Sub-Saharan Africa, and India. It highlights public-private partnerships and impact investment as it relates to challenges in increasing inclusivity in businesses. Results/Findings- It was evident that there are many government policies and programs to support entrepreneurship in the USA, UK, Sub-Saharan Africa, and India, but limited empirical studies have been documented to evaluate the impact of these policies on entrepreneurship for persons with disabilities. Some of the challenges cited in the literature included gender gap, cost of doing business, and the likelihood to be funded to launch a business as common dominant factors reported on the issue of inclusion. Practical implications and Conclusions-The authors find that there are much more empirical research and analyses warranted in the study of entrepreneurship inclusion and empowerment of the underserved, especially for persons with disabilities. A continue reviewing literature and use quantitative and qualitative research such that additional programs, projects, and policies may be developed to serve all inclusively.
“包容性创业:对残疾人包容的批判性审视”
关于包容的定义有很多,因为它涉及到服务不足和通过创业获得经济权力,但这些定义中很少专门针对残疾人。研究目的——在文献中,许多研究都着眼于通过创业增加妇女、少数民族、青年、老年人、移民和农村居民的经济赋权。然而,差距在于,将所有这些类别归为一类导致忽视了残疾人面临的具体挑战。特别是在冠状病毒大流行期间,这种对经济包容性的忽视被放大了。设计/方法-本研究回顾文献,寻找证据,以记录发达国家和发展中国家为应对包容性创业的总体挑战而采用的计划、项目和政策。本文探讨了几项关于英国、美国、撒哈拉以南非洲和印度商业生态系统包容性的创业研究。报告强调了公私伙伴关系和影响力投资,因为这与提高企业包容性方面的挑战有关。结果/发现-很明显,在美国、英国、撒哈拉以南非洲和印度,有许多政府政策和项目支持创业,但有限的实证研究已经记录下来,以评估这些政策对残疾人创业的影响。文献中提到的一些挑战包括性别差距、经营成本和创业融资的可能性,这些都是关于包容性问题的常见主导因素。实际意义和结论——作者发现,在创业包容性和对服务不足人群(尤其是残疾人)赋权的研究中,需要进行更多的实证研究和分析。继续回顾文献并使用定量和定性研究,以便制定更多的计划、项目和政策,以全面地为所有人服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信