Ideology Contestation in Management of University Library Development

Nurdin Laugu
{"title":"Ideology Contestation in Management of University Library Development","authors":"Nurdin Laugu","doi":"10.21580/JSW.2019.3.2.4266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Library collection development is mostly studied as professionalism based on a positivistic paradigm neglecting constructivist based paradigm. This constructivist base is reflected in various factors, such as ideology and commodification, which influence collection development. This research aims to investigate ideological contestation and commodification of institutions and audiences related to the collection development of Muhammadiyah University library. The ideological contestation was examined using Giddens’ structuration and Bourdieu’s habitus. The research data was collected from interviews with five informants from librarians and library directors. The data were supported by observation and documentation. The data obtained were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman technique based on three stages: reduction, display, and conclusion/verification. The results of the research found three formations in contestation, i.e. internal institutions, external institutions, and professionalism of librarians. The internal institution represented by the UMY Library encountered with outside institutions, such as American Corner, Iranian Corner, and publishers. Meanwhile, librarians show their professionalism in facing the ideological domination of those institutions through various strategies regarding the development of library collection.","PeriodicalId":34869,"journal":{"name":"JSW Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSW Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/JSW.2019.3.2.4266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Library collection development is mostly studied as professionalism based on a positivistic paradigm neglecting constructivist based paradigm. This constructivist base is reflected in various factors, such as ideology and commodification, which influence collection development. This research aims to investigate ideological contestation and commodification of institutions and audiences related to the collection development of Muhammadiyah University library. The ideological contestation was examined using Giddens’ structuration and Bourdieu’s habitus. The research data was collected from interviews with five informants from librarians and library directors. The data were supported by observation and documentation. The data obtained were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman technique based on three stages: reduction, display, and conclusion/verification. The results of the research found three formations in contestation, i.e. internal institutions, external institutions, and professionalism of librarians. The internal institution represented by the UMY Library encountered with outside institutions, such as American Corner, Iranian Corner, and publishers. Meanwhile, librarians show their professionalism in facing the ideological domination of those institutions through various strategies regarding the development of library collection.
高校图书馆发展管理中的意识形态之争
图书馆馆藏发展的研究多是基于实证主义范式的专业主义研究,而忽略了基于建构主义范式的研究。这种建构主义基础体现在影响收藏发展的各种因素上,如意识形态和商品化。本研究旨在探讨与穆罕默德迪亚大学图书馆馆藏发展相关的机构和受众的意识形态争论和商品化。运用吉登斯的结构理论和布迪厄的惯习理论对意识形态之争进行了考察。研究数据收集自对五位图书管理员和图书馆馆长的采访。这些数据得到了观察和文献的支持。使用Miles和Huberman技术对获得的数据进行了基于三个阶段的分析:还原,显示和结论/验证。研究结果发现,存在争议的有三种形态,即内部制度、外部制度和图书馆员的职业化。以UMY图书馆为代表的内部机构遇到了外部机构,如美国之角、伊朗之角和出版商。同时,面对这些机构的意识形态支配,图书馆员通过发展馆藏的各种策略,展现了自身的专业素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信