Feignfullness prohibition: administrative and legal research with elements of an economic approach

Svetlana Кorenkova
{"title":"Feignfullness prohibition: administrative and legal research with elements of an economic approach","authors":"Svetlana Кorenkova","doi":"10.31857/s102694520021159-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2013, a legislative prohibition was introduced in the Russian Federation, and in 2016, the administrative punishability of registering feigned accounting objects in accounting registers (hereinafter referred to as the feignfullness prohibition). A legal comparison of the concepts of “feigned accounting object” and “feigned transaction” conducted in 2021 demonstrated a lack of interest in the feignfullness prohibition on the part of both legal science and law enforcement practice. Economists, however, have been showing a scientific interest in studying the feignfullness prohibition since 2013, do not assess not only the legal validity of this prohibition, but also the degree of violation of the rights of economic entities. This circumstance served as an impetus for the economic study of the feignfullness prohibition, taking into account its legal characteristics. As a result, it was concluded that this prohibition is associated with excessive restrictions on the rights of economic entities, is not fully legally justified and requires correction of accounting legislation.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520021159-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2013, a legislative prohibition was introduced in the Russian Federation, and in 2016, the administrative punishability of registering feigned accounting objects in accounting registers (hereinafter referred to as the feignfullness prohibition). A legal comparison of the concepts of “feigned accounting object” and “feigned transaction” conducted in 2021 demonstrated a lack of interest in the feignfullness prohibition on the part of both legal science and law enforcement practice. Economists, however, have been showing a scientific interest in studying the feignfullness prohibition since 2013, do not assess not only the legal validity of this prohibition, but also the degree of violation of the rights of economic entities. This circumstance served as an impetus for the economic study of the feignfullness prohibition, taking into account its legal characteristics. As a result, it was concluded that this prohibition is associated with excessive restrictions on the rights of economic entities, is not fully legally justified and requires correction of accounting legislation.
伪造禁止:行政和法律研究与经济方法的要素
2013年,俄罗斯联邦立法禁止,2016年,在会计登记册中登记虚假会计对象的行政处罚(以下简称“禁止伪造”)。2021年对“虚假会计对象”和“虚假交易”概念进行的法律比较表明,无论是法律科学还是执法实践,都缺乏对虚假禁止的兴趣。然而,自2013年以来,经济学家们对假币禁令的研究表现出了科学的兴趣,他们不仅没有评估这一禁令的法律效力,也没有评估侵犯经济实体权利的程度。这种情况为考虑假币禁令的法律特征,对假币禁令进行经济研究提供了动力。因此,得出的结论是,这种禁止与对经济实体权利的过度限制有关,在法律上没有充分的理由,需要纠正会计立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信