Efficacy and Safety of Standardized Protocol of CPAP Therapy for Full-Term Newborns in Delivery Room at Transient Tachypnea: Clinical Trial with Historical Control

E. V. Shestak, O. Kovtun, O. Ksenofontova, D. Dodrov
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Standardized Protocol of CPAP Therapy for Full-Term Newborns in Delivery Room at Transient Tachypnea: Clinical Trial with Historical Control","authors":"E. V. Shestak, O. Kovtun, O. Ksenofontova, D. Dodrov","doi":"10.15690/vsp.v21i4.2445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Nowadays there is no consensus on the tactics and optimal protocol for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (СРАР) at transient tachypnea of newborns (TTN) in delivery room. Objective. The aim of the study is to examine the efficacy and safety of standardized protocol of CPAP therapy for newborns with TTN in delivery room. Methods. The clinical study (implementation of standardized CPAP protocol) included full-term infants (gestational age — 37–41 weeks) with diagnosed TTN and CPAP therapy during first 60 minutes of life. Similar inclusion criteria were applied for the historical control group (born within previous year for whom CPAP was implemented according to “usual” protocol). Initiation of mononasal CPAP in main group was carried out when respiratory disorders were assessed according to Downes scale ≥ 3 points with control points at 20–40–60 minutes via the same scale, in control group at ≥ 4 points — for all cases, and according to the doctor's decision at 1–3 points. Mean airway pressure was maintained at 8 and 5–10 cm H2O, CPAP duration was 20–60 and 5–30 min, respectively. The major endpoints: the frequency of patient transfer from delivery room to intensive care unit or hospitalization to the neonatal pathology department, as well as total period of hospitalization. Moreover, frequency of invasive manipulations (intravenous catheterization, parenteral feeding), antibacterial therapy, cerebral injuries (cerebral ischemia, intracerebral hemorrhage), nasal passages injuries, pneumothorax (in the first 24 hours of life) were recorded during the entire hospitalization period. Results. 140 newborns with TTN were included in the clinical study, 30 were excluded from the study, specifically 13 due to violation of the CPAP protocol. The historical control group included 165 newborns. This groups were comparable for most baseline (before the start of CPAP) indicators except for maternal COVID-19 frequency during pregnancy and twin newborns frequency. This groups were comparable for most baseline (before the start of CPAP) indicators except for the frequency of maternal COVID-19 cases during pregnancy and the frequency of twin newborns. Hospitalization rate in intensive care units (18.2 versus 70.3%; p < 0.001) and neonatal pathology departments (31.8 versus 80.0%; p < 0.001), as well as total period of hospitalization (3 versus 10 days; p < 0.001) were lower in the standardized CPAP therapy group. Lower frequency of invasive manipulations, antibacterial therapy, and cerebral ischemia was recorded in this group. The safety of СРАР administration in delivery room was confirmed by the absence of nasal passages injuries in both groups, as well as comparable frequency of pneumothorax. Conclusion. The use of standardized CPAP protocol in delivery room for full-term newborns with TTN had higher rate of favorable hospitalization outcomes. Study limitations require validation of all the findings in independent studies.","PeriodicalId":10867,"journal":{"name":"Current pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v21i4.2445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Nowadays there is no consensus on the tactics and optimal protocol for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (СРАР) at transient tachypnea of newborns (TTN) in delivery room. Objective. The aim of the study is to examine the efficacy and safety of standardized protocol of CPAP therapy for newborns with TTN in delivery room. Methods. The clinical study (implementation of standardized CPAP protocol) included full-term infants (gestational age — 37–41 weeks) with diagnosed TTN and CPAP therapy during first 60 minutes of life. Similar inclusion criteria were applied for the historical control group (born within previous year for whom CPAP was implemented according to “usual” protocol). Initiation of mononasal CPAP in main group was carried out when respiratory disorders were assessed according to Downes scale ≥ 3 points with control points at 20–40–60 minutes via the same scale, in control group at ≥ 4 points — for all cases, and according to the doctor's decision at 1–3 points. Mean airway pressure was maintained at 8 and 5–10 cm H2O, CPAP duration was 20–60 and 5–30 min, respectively. The major endpoints: the frequency of patient transfer from delivery room to intensive care unit or hospitalization to the neonatal pathology department, as well as total period of hospitalization. Moreover, frequency of invasive manipulations (intravenous catheterization, parenteral feeding), antibacterial therapy, cerebral injuries (cerebral ischemia, intracerebral hemorrhage), nasal passages injuries, pneumothorax (in the first 24 hours of life) were recorded during the entire hospitalization period. Results. 140 newborns with TTN were included in the clinical study, 30 were excluded from the study, specifically 13 due to violation of the CPAP protocol. The historical control group included 165 newborns. This groups were comparable for most baseline (before the start of CPAP) indicators except for maternal COVID-19 frequency during pregnancy and twin newborns frequency. This groups were comparable for most baseline (before the start of CPAP) indicators except for the frequency of maternal COVID-19 cases during pregnancy and the frequency of twin newborns. Hospitalization rate in intensive care units (18.2 versus 70.3%; p < 0.001) and neonatal pathology departments (31.8 versus 80.0%; p < 0.001), as well as total period of hospitalization (3 versus 10 days; p < 0.001) were lower in the standardized CPAP therapy group. Lower frequency of invasive manipulations, antibacterial therapy, and cerebral ischemia was recorded in this group. The safety of СРАР administration in delivery room was confirmed by the absence of nasal passages injuries in both groups, as well as comparable frequency of pneumothorax. Conclusion. The use of standardized CPAP protocol in delivery room for full-term newborns with TTN had higher rate of favorable hospitalization outcomes. Study limitations require validation of all the findings in independent studies.
产房内一过性呼吸急促足月新生儿CPAP标准化治疗方案的疗效和安全性:历史对照临床试验
背景。目前对产房新生儿短暂性呼吸急促(TTN)持续气道正压通气(СРАР)的策略和最佳方案尚无共识。目标。本研究旨在探讨产房CPAP治疗新生儿TTN的标准化方案的有效性和安全性。方法。临床研究(实施标准化CPAP方案)包括在出生后60分钟内诊断为TTN并接受CPAP治疗的足月婴儿(胎龄- 37-41周)。历史对照组(前一年内出生,按“常规”方案实施CPAP)采用类似的纳入标准。当呼吸障碍按Downes量表≥3分进行评估时,主组开始单鼻CPAP,对照组所有病例均按≥4分进行评估,控制点为20-40-60分钟,1-3分根据医生决定。平均气道压力维持在8和5-10 cm H2O, CPAP持续时间分别为20-60和5-30 min。主要终点:患者从产房转至重症监护病房或住院至新生儿病理科的频率,以及总住院时间。此外,记录整个住院期间有创操作(静脉置管、肠外喂养)、抗菌治疗、脑损伤(脑缺血、脑出血)、鼻道损伤、气胸(出生后24小时)的发生频率。结果:140名患有TTN的新生儿纳入临床研究,30名因违反CPAP协议而被排除在研究之外,其中13名因违反CPAP协议而被排除。历史对照组包括165名新生儿。这两组在大多数基线(CPAP开始前)指标上具有可比性,但妊娠期间孕产妇COVID-19频率和双胞胎新生儿频率除外。除了妊娠期间孕产妇COVID-19病例的频率和双胞胎新生儿的频率外,这两组在大多数基线(CPAP开始前)指标上具有可比性。重症监护病房的住院率(18.2比70.3%;P < 0.001)和新生儿病理科(31.8% vs 80.0%;P < 0.001),以及总住院时间(3天vs 10天;p < 0.001),标准化CPAP治疗组较低。有创手法、抗菌药物治疗及脑缺血发生率均较低。两组患者均无鼻道损伤,气胸发生率相当,证实了产房中СРАР给药的安全性。结论。在产房采用标准化CPAP方案治疗TTN足月新生儿的住院预后良好率较高。研究的局限性需要对独立研究中的所有发现进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信