Determinants of Basketball Match Outcome Based on Game-related Statistics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Sarah Cristina Montes Canuto, Marcos Bezerra de Almeida
{"title":"Determinants of Basketball Match Outcome Based on Game-related Statistics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Sarah Cristina Montes Canuto, Marcos Bezerra de Almeida","doi":"10.21134/eurjhm.2022.48.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to systematically review the current scientific literature on game-related statistics (GRS) that better discriminate between basketball winning and losing teams, and to identify the magnitude of the difference of the most frequently cited GRS between winning and losing teams via meta-analysis. A systematic search of the databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, Science Direct, Latindex, Scholar Google, and Scielo was performed. Keywords addressed discriminant analysis, game-related statistics, discriminant factors, determinant factors, game outcome, match analysis, winning and losing,and basketball. Data from 20 out of 533articles were eligible to be extracted. Structural Coefficients (SC)values were considered relevant for analysis when ≥0.32. Results indicated that defensive rebounds and assists were classified as good (SC ≥ 0.46) or very good (SC ≥ 0.56) discriminant factors. Both were the most frequently GRS cited as discriminant factors, regardless of location, phase of the competition, or opponent’s level. Based on these indicators, eight studies were included for meta-analysis.Meta-analyses showed that winning teams have at least six more defensive rebounds (95% CI = 4.22 -7.99; p < 0.0001) and around four more assists than losing teams (95% CI = 3.14 -4.50; p < 0.0001). Coaches should emphasize defensive rebounding and assisting drills intheir practice planning to improve the likelihood of winning games.","PeriodicalId":36150,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Movement","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2022.48.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically review the current scientific literature on game-related statistics (GRS) that better discriminate between basketball winning and losing teams, and to identify the magnitude of the difference of the most frequently cited GRS between winning and losing teams via meta-analysis. A systematic search of the databases Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, Science Direct, Latindex, Scholar Google, and Scielo was performed. Keywords addressed discriminant analysis, game-related statistics, discriminant factors, determinant factors, game outcome, match analysis, winning and losing,and basketball. Data from 20 out of 533articles were eligible to be extracted. Structural Coefficients (SC)values were considered relevant for analysis when ≥0.32. Results indicated that defensive rebounds and assists were classified as good (SC ≥ 0.46) or very good (SC ≥ 0.56) discriminant factors. Both were the most frequently GRS cited as discriminant factors, regardless of location, phase of the competition, or opponent’s level. Based on these indicators, eight studies were included for meta-analysis.Meta-analyses showed that winning teams have at least six more defensive rebounds (95% CI = 4.22 -7.99; p < 0.0001) and around four more assists than losing teams (95% CI = 3.14 -4.50; p < 0.0001). Coaches should emphasize defensive rebounding and assisting drills intheir practice planning to improve the likelihood of winning games.
基于比赛相关统计的篮球比赛结果决定因素:系统回顾和元分析
本研究旨在系统回顾当前关于比赛相关统计(game-related statistics, GRS)的科学文献,以更好地区分篮球输赢球队,并通过荟萃分析确定输赢球队之间最常被引用的GRS差异的大小。系统检索了Web of Science、Scopus、SPORTDiscus、PubMed、Science Direct、Latindex、Scholar Google和Scielo数据库。关键词:判别分析,比赛相关统计,判别因素,决定因素,比赛结果,比赛分析,输赢,篮球。533篇文章中有20篇的数据符合提取条件。结构系数(SC)值≥0.32时认为与分析相关。结果表明,防守篮板和助攻被划分为良好(SC≥0.46)和非常良好(SC≥0.56)判别因素。无论地点、竞争阶段或对手水平如何,这两个因素都是GRS最常提到的歧视性因素。基于这些指标,纳入8项研究进行meta分析。荟萃分析显示,获胜的球队至少有6个以上的防守篮板(95% CI = 4.22 -7.99;p < 0.0001),并且比输球的球队多出4次助攻(95% CI = 3.14 -4.50;P < 0.0001)。教练应该在他们的训练计划中强调防守篮板和辅助训练,以提高赢得比赛的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Movement
European Journal of Human Movement Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信