Differences in household attitudes on food defence and food safety: an international comparison

T. Stinson, L. Albisu, Maurizio Canavari, Ronald B. Larson, A. Gracia
{"title":"Differences in household attitudes on food defence and food safety: an international comparison","authors":"T. Stinson, L. Albisu, Maurizio Canavari, Ronald B. Larson, A. Gracia","doi":"10.1504/IJFSNPH.2011.042573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports results from a large, six-nation, internet-based survey of consumer attitudes toward food safety and food defence administered during the fall of 2008. Responses were obtained from separate samples of approximately 1,000 each in Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Food defence was generally a greater concern, and respondents were less confident that their food supply was well protected against terrorist attack than they were that their food was safe from contamination from naturally occurring pathogens. Respondents also believed a greater percentage of national food protection budgets should be spent on food safety rather than food defence. Processors were considered most responsible for both food safety and food defence, with government also playing a major role in food defence.","PeriodicalId":14113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food Safety, Nutrition and Public Health","volume":"34 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food Safety, Nutrition and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFSNPH.2011.042573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reports results from a large, six-nation, internet-based survey of consumer attitudes toward food safety and food defence administered during the fall of 2008. Responses were obtained from separate samples of approximately 1,000 each in Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Food defence was generally a greater concern, and respondents were less confident that their food supply was well protected against terrorist attack than they were that their food was safe from contamination from naturally occurring pathogens. Respondents also believed a greater percentage of national food protection budgets should be spent on food safety rather than food defence. Processors were considered most responsible for both food safety and food defence, with government also playing a major role in food defence.
家庭对食品防御和食品安全态度的差异:国际比较
本文报告了2008年秋季进行的一项大型、六国、基于互联网的消费者对食品安全和食品防御态度调查的结果。我们从德国、意大利、日本、西班牙、英国和美国的大约1000个独立样本中获得了回复。食品防御通常是一个更大的问题,受访者对他们的食品供应是否能很好地防范恐怖袭击的信心不如对他们的食品不受自然发生的病原体污染的信心。答复者还认为,国家食品保护预算应更多地用于食品安全,而不是食品防御。加工商被认为对食品安全和食品防御负有最大责任,政府在食品防御方面也发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信