Prognosis and Remodeling after Endovascular Repair for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

Yang Zhao, C. Yao, H. Yin, Mian Wang, Zi-lun Li, Jingsong Wang, Zuojun Hu, Shenming Wang, G. Chang
{"title":"Prognosis and Remodeling after Endovascular Repair for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Yang Zhao, C. Yao, H. Yin, Mian Wang, Zi-lun Li, Jingsong Wang, Zuojun Hu, Shenming Wang, G. Chang","doi":"10.1177/15266028221098703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is already well introduced, but the best time point to perform TEVAR has not been defined. This study was to report mid- to long-term outcomes and aortic remodeling of TEVAR in patients with TBAD.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nIn total, 318 TBAD patients from June 2001 to May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on interval between dissection onset to TEVAR: acute (0-7 days), subacute (8-30 days), and chronic (>30 days). Clinical and morphological data were collected and analyzed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe follow-up aorta-related mortality rates in the 3 groups were 17.6%, 2.6%, 4.2%, and the proximal stent-induced new entry rates were 11.8%, 1.6%, 2.8%, respectively. Aortic remodeling was satisfied in both the acute and subacute group, but the false lumen diameter did not decrease (p>0.05) in the chronic group. Compared with the VIRTUE classification (acute, 0-14 days; subacute, 15-92 days; chronic, >92 days), mid- to long-term outcomes of patients within the first overlapped interval between the 2 classifications (8-14 days) were similar to that of subacute patients (15-30 days), while aortic remodeling of patients in the second overlapped interval (31-92 days) was similar to that of chronic patients (>92 days).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study suggests that TEVAR for subacute TBAD is associated with a low long-term rate of aorta-related death. Aortic remodeling of chronic dissections is not satisfactory. Additional results suggest that the subacute phase (8-30 days) may be the optimal time to perform TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"24 1","pages":"15266028221098703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221098703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PURPOSE Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is already well introduced, but the best time point to perform TEVAR has not been defined. This study was to report mid- to long-term outcomes and aortic remodeling of TEVAR in patients with TBAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 318 TBAD patients from June 2001 to May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on interval between dissection onset to TEVAR: acute (0-7 days), subacute (8-30 days), and chronic (>30 days). Clinical and morphological data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The follow-up aorta-related mortality rates in the 3 groups were 17.6%, 2.6%, 4.2%, and the proximal stent-induced new entry rates were 11.8%, 1.6%, 2.8%, respectively. Aortic remodeling was satisfied in both the acute and subacute group, but the false lumen diameter did not decrease (p>0.05) in the chronic group. Compared with the VIRTUE classification (acute, 0-14 days; subacute, 15-92 days; chronic, >92 days), mid- to long-term outcomes of patients within the first overlapped interval between the 2 classifications (8-14 days) were similar to that of subacute patients (15-30 days), while aortic remodeling of patients in the second overlapped interval (31-92 days) was similar to that of chronic patients (>92 days). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that TEVAR for subacute TBAD is associated with a low long-term rate of aorta-related death. Aortic remodeling of chronic dissections is not satisfactory. Additional results suggest that the subacute phase (8-30 days) may be the optimal time to perform TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD.
急性、亚急性和慢性B型主动脉夹层血管内修复后的预后和重构。
目的胸椎血管内主动脉瓣修复术(TEVAR)治疗B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)已经得到了很好的介绍,但实施TEVAR的最佳时间点尚未确定。本研究旨在报道TBAD患者TEVAR的中长期预后和主动脉重塑。材料与方法回顾性分析2001年6月至2016年5月共318例TBAD患者。根据夹层发生至TEVAR的时间间隔将患者分为急性(0-7天)、亚急性(8-30天)和慢性(bb0 -30天)3组。收集并分析临床及形态学资料。结果3组随访主动脉相关死亡率分别为17.6%、2.6%、4.2%,近端支架诱导新入组率分别为11.8%、1.6%、2.8%。急性和亚急性组主动脉重构均满意,但慢性组假腔直径未减小(p < 0.05)。与VIRTUE分类(急性,0-14天;亚急性期,15-92天;慢性,>92天),在两种分类之间的第一个重叠间隔(8-14天)内患者的中长期结局与亚急性患者(15-30天)相似,而在第二个重叠间隔(31-92天)内患者的主动脉重塑与慢性患者(>92天)相似。结论:该研究表明,TEVAR治疗亚急性TBAD与主动脉相关性死亡率较低相关。慢性夹层的主动脉重塑效果不理想。其他结果表明,亚急性期(8-30天)可能是对非复杂性TBAD实施TEVAR的最佳时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
947
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信