Wrist-ankle acupuncture has a positive effect on chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meihua Pan, Y. Lan, Zhifu Wang
{"title":"Wrist-ankle acupuncture has a positive effect on chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Meihua Pan, Y. Lan, Zhifu Wang","doi":"10.1097/HM9.0000000000000059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of practitioners are using acupuncture methods such as wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA) to treat pain. We aimed systematically to evaluate the effects of WAA on cancer pain, primary pain, chronic musculoskeletal pain and pathological neuralgia pain. Nine electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on WAA from inception of the data base to July 31, 2022. RCTs within the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Outcomes included pain score, clinical efficacy (overall efficiency), and occurrence of adverse events. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software to determine the effect of WAA intervention and statistical significance was set a P < 0.05. A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis including 1,380 participants, consisting of 673 who had received WAA alone or in combination with other treatments (WAA group, WG) and 707 who did not receive WAA (control group, CG). Subgroup analyses were performed according to different chronic pain types and occurrence of adverse events of WAA versus oral or non-oral drug therapy. The WG had better analgesic effects on various types of chronic pain than CG (P < 0.00001) and clinical efficacy (P < 0.00001). Additionally, WAA was shown to be safer than oral medication (P = 0.09). Therefore, WAA has good analgesic efficacy for several types of common chronic pain alone and in combination with other therapies, and it is safer than oral medication. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to support this evidence. Graphical abstract: http://links.lww.com/AHM/A48","PeriodicalId":93856,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","volume":"78 1","pages":"7 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HM9.0000000000000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An increasing number of practitioners are using acupuncture methods such as wrist-ankle acupuncture (WAA) to treat pain. We aimed systematically to evaluate the effects of WAA on cancer pain, primary pain, chronic musculoskeletal pain and pathological neuralgia pain. Nine electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on WAA from inception of the data base to July 31, 2022. RCTs within the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Outcomes included pain score, clinical efficacy (overall efficiency), and occurrence of adverse events. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software to determine the effect of WAA intervention and statistical significance was set a P < 0.05. A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis including 1,380 participants, consisting of 673 who had received WAA alone or in combination with other treatments (WAA group, WG) and 707 who did not receive WAA (control group, CG). Subgroup analyses were performed according to different chronic pain types and occurrence of adverse events of WAA versus oral or non-oral drug therapy. The WG had better analgesic effects on various types of chronic pain than CG (P < 0.00001) and clinical efficacy (P < 0.00001). Additionally, WAA was shown to be safer than oral medication (P = 0.09). Therefore, WAA has good analgesic efficacy for several types of common chronic pain alone and in combination with other therapies, and it is safer than oral medication. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to support this evidence. Graphical abstract: http://links.lww.com/AHM/A48
腕踝针灸对慢性疼痛有积极作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
越来越多的从业者正在使用针灸方法,如腕踝针灸(WAA)来治疗疼痛。我们的目的是系统地评估WAA对癌症疼痛、原发性疼痛、慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和病理性神经痛疼痛的影响。检索自数据库建立至2022年7月31日的9个电子数据库中有关WAA的随机对照试验(rct)。纳入标准和排除标准的随机对照试验纳入本研究。结果包括疼痛评分、临床疗效(总有效率)和不良事件的发生。采用Cochrane协作标准评价偏倚风险,采用RevMan 5.4.1软件进行meta分析确定WAA干预效果,P < 0.05为统计学意义。荟萃分析共纳入19项随机对照试验,包括1380名参与者,其中673名单独接受WAA或联合其他治疗(WAA组,WG), 707名未接受WAA(对照组,CG)。根据不同的慢性疼痛类型和WAA与口服或非口服药物治疗的不良事件发生情况进行亚组分析。WG对各类型慢性疼痛的镇痛效果均优于CG (P < 0.00001)和临床疗效(P < 0.00001)。此外,WAA比口服药物更安全(P = 0.09)。因此,WAA对几种常见慢性疼痛单独或联合其他疗法均有较好的镇痛效果,且比口服药物更安全。然而,未来需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来支持这一证据。图形摘要:http://links.lww.com/AHM/A48
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信