Doctoral clinical psychology student commentary on common myths about CBT: lessons learned for competency-based training

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ashton Dessert, Aadila Lynch, Ashley R McMillon, Madeline Terrill, Brad A. MacNeil
{"title":"Doctoral clinical psychology student commentary on common myths about CBT: lessons learned for competency-based training","authors":"Ashton Dessert, Aadila Lynch, Ashley R McMillon, Madeline Terrill, Brad A. MacNeil","doi":"10.1017/S1754470X23000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Effective methods for training and education in the dissemination of evidence-based treatments is a priority. This commentary provides doctoral clinical psychology graduate student authors perspectives on common myths about cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Three myths were identified and considered: (1) CBT does not value the therapeutic relationship; (2) CBT is overly rigid; and (3) exposure techniques are cruel. Graduate students were engaged in a competency-based course in Cognitive Behavioural Approaches to Psychotherapy at an American Psychological Association (APA)-accredited doctoral clinical psychology program. The origins of common myths identified by graduate students included a lack of in-depth coverage of CBT and brief video segments provided during introductory courses, lived experience with CBT, and pre-determined views of manualized treatment and exposure techniques. Myth-addressing factors discussed by graduate students included holding space at the start of training for a discussion of attitudes about CBT, specific learning activities, and course content described in this commentary. Finally, self-reported changes in graduate students’ attitudes and behaviour following the course included a more favourable view of CBT as valuing the therapeutic relationship, as well as implementation of resources provided, and techniques learned and practised at practicum settings. Limitations and lessons learned are discussed through the lens of a model of adult learning that may be applied to future graduate training in evidence-based therapies like CBT. Key learning aims (1) To understand common myths about cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) that doctoral students in clinical psychology hold prior to entering a course in CBT. (2) To understand the possible origins of these myths, factors that may address their impacts, and changes in attitudes and behaviour among graduate students as a result. (3) To examine the lessons learned that can be applied to future training in evidence-based therapies like CBT.","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X23000016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Effective methods for training and education in the dissemination of evidence-based treatments is a priority. This commentary provides doctoral clinical psychology graduate student authors perspectives on common myths about cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Three myths were identified and considered: (1) CBT does not value the therapeutic relationship; (2) CBT is overly rigid; and (3) exposure techniques are cruel. Graduate students were engaged in a competency-based course in Cognitive Behavioural Approaches to Psychotherapy at an American Psychological Association (APA)-accredited doctoral clinical psychology program. The origins of common myths identified by graduate students included a lack of in-depth coverage of CBT and brief video segments provided during introductory courses, lived experience with CBT, and pre-determined views of manualized treatment and exposure techniques. Myth-addressing factors discussed by graduate students included holding space at the start of training for a discussion of attitudes about CBT, specific learning activities, and course content described in this commentary. Finally, self-reported changes in graduate students’ attitudes and behaviour following the course included a more favourable view of CBT as valuing the therapeutic relationship, as well as implementation of resources provided, and techniques learned and practised at practicum settings. Limitations and lessons learned are discussed through the lens of a model of adult learning that may be applied to future graduate training in evidence-based therapies like CBT. Key learning aims (1) To understand common myths about cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) that doctoral students in clinical psychology hold prior to entering a course in CBT. (2) To understand the possible origins of these myths, factors that may address their impacts, and changes in attitudes and behaviour among graduate students as a result. (3) To examine the lessons learned that can be applied to future training in evidence-based therapies like CBT.
临床心理学博士学生对认知行为疗法的常见误解的评论:基于能力的培训的经验教训
在循证治疗的传播中,有效的培训和教育方法是一个优先事项。这篇评论提供了博士临床心理学研究生作者对认知行为疗法(CBT)的常见误解的观点。我们发现并考虑了三个误区:(1)CBT不重视治疗关系;(2) CBT过于僵化;(3)曝光技术是残酷的。在美国心理协会(APA)认可的临床心理学博士项目中,研究生们参与了一门以能力为基础的心理治疗认知行为方法课程。研究生发现的常见误解的起源包括缺乏对CBT的深入报道和入门课程中提供的简短视频片段,CBT的生活经验,以及预先确定的手动治疗和暴露技术的观点。研究生讨论的消除误解的因素包括在培训开始时留出空间,讨论对CBT的态度、具体的学习活动和本评论中描述的课程内容。最后,研究生自我报告的态度和行为在课程后的变化包括对CBT的更有利的看法,即重视治疗关系,以及提供的资源的实施,以及在实习环境中学习和实践的技术。通过成人学习模型的视角讨论了局限性和经验教训,该模型可能应用于未来的基于证据的治疗方法(如CBT)的研究生培训。主要学习目标(1)了解临床心理学博士生在进入认知行为治疗(CBT)课程之前对认知行为治疗(CBT)的常见误解。(2)了解这些神话的可能起源,可能解决其影响的因素,以及由此导致的研究生态度和行为的变化。(3)研究可以应用于CBT等循证疗法的未来培训的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信