Comparison of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with postoperative spinal and extremity wound lnfections

N. Lau, Chia-Wei Chang, Tsung-Ting Tsai, C. Niu, P. Lai, T. Fu, L. Chen, Wen‐Jer Chen
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with postoperative spinal and extremity wound lnfections","authors":"N. Lau, Chia-Wei Chang, Tsung-Ting Tsai, C. Niu, P. Lai, T. Fu, L. Chen, Wen‐Jer Chen","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.20160503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) has been shown to promote the healing of ischemic and infected tissue; therefore, it may be useful for treating non-healing postoperative wound infection. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of HBO therapy in the treatment of postoperative spinal and extremity wound infections. Methods: From 1995 to 2011, 284 patients with postoperative wound infection were enrolled in this study and divided into 2 groups: groups I, 26 patients (spinal wound infection) and group II, 235 patients (upper and lower extremities wound infection). HBO therapy was indicated when infection showed no improvement of clinical symptoms/signs and laboratory testing following appropriate antibiotic therapy for at least 2 weeks. All patients received HBO therapy one cycle (20 times) as an adjunctive treatment, and the following data were collected retrospectively: age, sex, comorbidity (diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, and end-stage renal disease), and type of bacteria (gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic). These clinical results and outcomes after HBO therapy were analyzed Results: Sex and diabetes mellitus incidence were significantly different between the 2 groups; the extremities infection group had more male and fewer diabetic patients. No significant difference between the groups was found in terms of other factors, comorbidity, or type of bacteria. Although the overall clinical outcome after HBO treatment was not significantly different between the groups, the spinal group showed a higher percentage of excellent results after infection with a gram-positive pathogen. Conclusion: Patients with post-operative spinal wound infection under HBO therapy have similar treatment responses to patients with the extremities wound infection. Clinical outcomes are not affected by comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, or end-stage renal disease. Therefore, HBO therapy is recommended as an adjunctive treatment for postoperative spinal wound infection.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"10 1","pages":"108-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.20160503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) has been shown to promote the healing of ischemic and infected tissue; therefore, it may be useful for treating non-healing postoperative wound infection. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of HBO therapy in the treatment of postoperative spinal and extremity wound infections. Methods: From 1995 to 2011, 284 patients with postoperative wound infection were enrolled in this study and divided into 2 groups: groups I, 26 patients (spinal wound infection) and group II, 235 patients (upper and lower extremities wound infection). HBO therapy was indicated when infection showed no improvement of clinical symptoms/signs and laboratory testing following appropriate antibiotic therapy for at least 2 weeks. All patients received HBO therapy one cycle (20 times) as an adjunctive treatment, and the following data were collected retrospectively: age, sex, comorbidity (diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, and end-stage renal disease), and type of bacteria (gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic). These clinical results and outcomes after HBO therapy were analyzed Results: Sex and diabetes mellitus incidence were significantly different between the 2 groups; the extremities infection group had more male and fewer diabetic patients. No significant difference between the groups was found in terms of other factors, comorbidity, or type of bacteria. Although the overall clinical outcome after HBO treatment was not significantly different between the groups, the spinal group showed a higher percentage of excellent results after infection with a gram-positive pathogen. Conclusion: Patients with post-operative spinal wound infection under HBO therapy have similar treatment responses to patients with the extremities wound infection. Clinical outcomes are not affected by comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, or end-stage renal disease. Therefore, HBO therapy is recommended as an adjunctive treatment for postoperative spinal wound infection.
高压氧治疗脊柱及肢体术后创面感染的疗效比较
背景:高压氧(HBO)已被证明可以促进缺血和感染组织的愈合;因此,它可能有助于治疗术后未愈合的伤口感染。本研究的目的是比较高压氧治疗术后脊柱和四肢伤口感染的疗效。方法:选取1995 ~ 2011年284例术后伤口感染患者,分为2组:I组26例(脊柱伤口感染),II组235例(上肢和下肢伤口感染)。当感染在适当的抗生素治疗至少2周后临床症状/体征和实验室检测没有改善时,需要进行HBO治疗。所有患者均接受一个周期(20次)的高压氧治疗作为辅助治疗,回顾性收集以下数据:年龄、性别、合并症(糖尿病、肝硬化和终末期肾病)、细菌类型(革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性和厌氧)。结果:两组患者的性别、糖尿病发生率差异有统计学意义;四肢感染组男性患者较多,糖尿病患者较少。在其他因素、合并症或细菌类型方面,两组之间没有发现显著差异。虽然高压氧治疗后的总体临床结果在两组之间没有显著差异,但脊柱组在革兰氏阳性病原体感染后表现出更高的优良率。结论:高压氧治疗后脊柱伤口感染患者与四肢伤口感染患者的治疗效果相似。临床结果不受合并症如糖尿病、肝硬化或终末期肾病的影响。因此,推荐高压氧治疗作为术后脊髓伤口感染的辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信