Mediation Role of Perceived Organizational Support on Nurses’ Work Engagement and Leadership Styles

Q2 Nursing
Aida Mehrad, J. Fernández-castro, Maria Pau González Gómez de Olmedo, R. García-Sierra
{"title":"Mediation Role of Perceived Organizational Support on Nurses’ Work Engagement and Leadership Styles","authors":"Aida Mehrad, J. Fernández-castro, Maria Pau González Gómez de Olmedo, R. García-Sierra","doi":"10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.45872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nurses’ work engagement is essential both for the quality of the service provided and occupational health. However, there is a lack of adequate information about nurses’ engagement in healthcare organizations that are affected by various factors in the context of Health Psychology.Purpose: This study was aimed at investigating the association between leadership styles of supervisors and work engagement, and elucidating the role of  organizational support in this relationship.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 85 nurses from the health organizations in Catalonia, Spain, recruited via a snowball procedure. Leadership styles and Three Outcome Scales (TOS) were evaluated through the Multifactorial Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) as independent variables. POS as an Organizational Support Test assessed a mediating variable (POS), and work engagement as a dependent variable was evaluated by the Utrecht Job Involvement Scale (UWES).Results: The results displayed differences in work engagement depending on job positions. Besides, the results revealed a positive association between leadership styles and TOS with work engagement, other than laissez-faire. Additionally, POS illustrated a positive association with work engagement (r=0.447, p<0.01). Leadership styles except for laissez-faire and TOS positively affect POS; also, TOS significantly predicted work engagement (β=0.581, t(78)=2.196, p<.05). Furthermore, results confirmed that POS mediates the relationship between leadership styles and TOS with work engagement (z=-3.490; z=3.117; z=3.521; z=3.791, p=0.000).Conclusion: Transformational and transactional leadership are two main styles significantly affecting nurses’ engagement with their work, while laissez-faire decreases nurses’ work engagement; therefore, supervisors and leaders of healthcare organizations should consider it. Consequently, nurses with a high POS show superior engagement levels at work. The research sheds new light on health psychology and the clinical area, particularly in nurses’ work engagement.","PeriodicalId":36409,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v12i2.45872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Nurses’ work engagement is essential both for the quality of the service provided and occupational health. However, there is a lack of adequate information about nurses’ engagement in healthcare organizations that are affected by various factors in the context of Health Psychology.Purpose: This study was aimed at investigating the association between leadership styles of supervisors and work engagement, and elucidating the role of  organizational support in this relationship.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 85 nurses from the health organizations in Catalonia, Spain, recruited via a snowball procedure. Leadership styles and Three Outcome Scales (TOS) were evaluated through the Multifactorial Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) as independent variables. POS as an Organizational Support Test assessed a mediating variable (POS), and work engagement as a dependent variable was evaluated by the Utrecht Job Involvement Scale (UWES).Results: The results displayed differences in work engagement depending on job positions. Besides, the results revealed a positive association between leadership styles and TOS with work engagement, other than laissez-faire. Additionally, POS illustrated a positive association with work engagement (r=0.447, p<0.01). Leadership styles except for laissez-faire and TOS positively affect POS; also, TOS significantly predicted work engagement (β=0.581, t(78)=2.196, p<.05). Furthermore, results confirmed that POS mediates the relationship between leadership styles and TOS with work engagement (z=-3.490; z=3.117; z=3.521; z=3.791, p=0.000).Conclusion: Transformational and transactional leadership are two main styles significantly affecting nurses’ engagement with their work, while laissez-faire decreases nurses’ work engagement; therefore, supervisors and leaders of healthcare organizations should consider it. Consequently, nurses with a high POS show superior engagement levels at work. The research sheds new light on health psychology and the clinical area, particularly in nurses’ work engagement.
感知组织支持对护士工作投入和领导风格的中介作用
背景:护士的工作投入对所提供的服务质量和职业健康都至关重要。然而,在健康心理学的背景下,缺乏关于护士参与受各种因素影响的医疗保健组织的足够信息。目的:本研究旨在探讨主管领导风格与工作投入的关系,并阐明组织支持在这一关系中的作用。方法:采用滚雪球法对西班牙加泰罗尼亚卫生机构的85名护士进行横断面研究。以多因素领导问卷(MLQ)作为自变量,评估领导风格和三个结果量表(TOS)。组织支持测验评估中介变量POS,工作投入评估因变量乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)。结果:结果显示不同职位的工作投入存在差异。此外,研究结果还显示,领导风格、工作满意度与工作投入之间存在正相关关系,而非自由放任型。此外,POS与工作投入呈正相关(r=0.447, p<0.01)。领导风格对员工满意度有正向影响;工作满意度对工作投入有显著的预测作用(β=0.581, t(78)=2.196, p< 0.05)。此外,研究结果证实,工作满意度在领导风格和工作满意度与工作投入之间具有中介作用(z=-3.490;z = 3.117;z = 3.521;z = 3.791, p = 0.000)。结论:变革型领导和交易型领导是影响护士工作敬业度的两种主要领导风格,而自由放任型领导会降低护士的工作敬业度;因此,医疗机构的主管和领导应该考虑到这一点。因此,高POS的护士在工作中表现出更高的敬业度。该研究揭示了新的健康心理学和临床领域,特别是在护士的工作投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信