Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary pathfinding instruments made of nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys with different heat treatments

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Luiz Carlos Trévia Morais Correia Viana, C. Maniglia-Ferreira, F. Almeida-Gomes, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho, Leonardo Pereira Garcia, F. G. Pappen
{"title":"Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary pathfinding instruments made of nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys with different heat treatments","authors":"Luiz Carlos Trévia Morais Correia Viana, C. Maniglia-Ferreira, F. Almeida-Gomes, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho, Leonardo Pereira Garcia, F. G. Pappen","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2019.33.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary pathfinding instruments made of nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys submitted to different heat treatments. \nMaterials and Methods: Eighty NiTi endodontic files were divided into four study groups, as follows: Scout Race 15.02 (FKG Deintaire SA), Pathfile 19.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Proglider 16.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and Hyflex GPS 20.02 (Coltene Whaledent, Allstatten, Switzerland). The instruments were subjected to cyclic fatigue testing using simulated canals with a 6mm radius and 30° or 45° curvature angles. The data obtained were organized in an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed statistically using BioEstat 5.3 software (Marimaua Institute, Manaus, Brazil). The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the analysis. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for multiple comparisons, at a significance level of 5%. \nResults: The Hyflex instrument was superior to all the other instruments (p<0.05), and Pathfile had a superior fatigue time (p<0.05) compared with Scout Race and Proglider, for both of the curvature angles analyzed. No significant difference was observed between Scout Race and Proglider. \nConclusions: Cyclic fatigue resistance of the HyFlex GPF instrument was the highest among those tested, and the curvature radius had a significant effect on fatigue resistance. A significant decrease in the cyclic fatigue time was observed, with an increase in the flexion (curvature angle), irrespective of the instrument analyzed.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2019.33.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary pathfinding instruments made of nickel-titanium (NiTi) alloys submitted to different heat treatments. Materials and Methods: Eighty NiTi endodontic files were divided into four study groups, as follows: Scout Race 15.02 (FKG Deintaire SA), Pathfile 19.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Proglider 16.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), and Hyflex GPS 20.02 (Coltene Whaledent, Allstatten, Switzerland). The instruments were subjected to cyclic fatigue testing using simulated canals with a 6mm radius and 30° or 45° curvature angles. The data obtained were organized in an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed statistically using BioEstat 5.3 software (Marimaua Institute, Manaus, Brazil). The non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the analysis. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for multiple comparisons, at a significance level of 5%. Results: The Hyflex instrument was superior to all the other instruments (p<0.05), and Pathfile had a superior fatigue time (p<0.05) compared with Scout Race and Proglider, for both of the curvature angles analyzed. No significant difference was observed between Scout Race and Proglider. Conclusions: Cyclic fatigue resistance of the HyFlex GPF instrument was the highest among those tested, and the curvature radius had a significant effect on fatigue resistance. A significant decrease in the cyclic fatigue time was observed, with an increase in the flexion (curvature angle), irrespective of the instrument analyzed.
不同热处理镍钛(NiTi)合金旋转式寻径仪的抗循环疲劳性能评价
目的:比较镍钛(NiTi)合金旋转寻径仪经不同热处理后的抗循环疲劳性能。材料与方法:80个NiTi牙根管锉分为4个研究组:Scout Race 15.02 (FKG Deintaire SA)、Pathfile 19.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)、Proglider 16.02 (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)和Hyflex GPS 20.02 (Coltene Whaledent, Allstatten, Switzerland)。仪器使用半径为6mm,曲率角为30°或45°的模拟管道进行循环疲劳测试。将获得的数据整理成Excel电子表格,并使用BioEstat 5.3软件(Marimaua Institute, Manaus, Brazil)进行统计分析。分析采用非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验。多重比较采用Mann-Whitney u检验,显著性水平为5%。结果:Hyflex器械优于其他器械(p<0.05), Pathfile器械的疲劳时间优于Scout Race和Proglider器械(p<0.05)。在Scout Race和Proglider之间没有显著差异。结论:HyFlex GPF仪器的抗循环疲劳性能最高,曲率半径对抗疲劳性能有显著影响。观察到循环疲劳时间显著减少,弯曲(曲率角)增加,与分析的仪器无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信