Towards Studying Service Function Chain Migration Patterns in 5G Networks and Beyond

Rami Akrem Addad, D. Dutra, Miloud Bagaa, T. Taleb, H. Flinck
{"title":"Towards Studying Service Function Chain Migration Patterns in 5G Networks and Beyond","authors":"Rami Akrem Addad, D. Dutra, Miloud Bagaa, T. Taleb, H. Flinck","doi":"10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the indispensable need for a reliable network architecture to cope with 5G networks, 3GPP introduced a covet technology dubbed 5G Service Based Architecture (5G-SBA). Meanwhile, Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) combined with SBA conveys a better experience to end- users by bringing application hosting from centralized data centers down to the network edge, closer to consumers and the data generated by applications. Both the 3GPP and the ETSI proposals offered numerous benefits, particularly the ability to deliver highly customizable services. Nevertheless, compared to large data- centers that tolerate the hosting of standard virtualization technologies (Virtual Machines (VMs) and servers), MEC nodes are characterized by lower computational resources, thus the debut of lightweight micro-service based applications. Motivated by the deficiency of current micro-services-based applications to support users’ mobility and assuming that all these issues are under the umbrella of Service Function Chain (SFC) migrations, we aim to introduce, explain and evaluate diverse SFC migration patterns. The obtained results demonstrate that there is no clear vanquisher, but selecting the right SFC migration pattern depends on users’ motion, applications’ requirements, and MEC nodes’ resources.","PeriodicalId":6868,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Given the indispensable need for a reliable network architecture to cope with 5G networks, 3GPP introduced a covet technology dubbed 5G Service Based Architecture (5G-SBA). Meanwhile, Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) combined with SBA conveys a better experience to end- users by bringing application hosting from centralized data centers down to the network edge, closer to consumers and the data generated by applications. Both the 3GPP and the ETSI proposals offered numerous benefits, particularly the ability to deliver highly customizable services. Nevertheless, compared to large data- centers that tolerate the hosting of standard virtualization technologies (Virtual Machines (VMs) and servers), MEC nodes are characterized by lower computational resources, thus the debut of lightweight micro-service based applications. Motivated by the deficiency of current micro-services-based applications to support users’ mobility and assuming that all these issues are under the umbrella of Service Function Chain (SFC) migrations, we aim to introduce, explain and evaluate diverse SFC migration patterns. The obtained results demonstrate that there is no clear vanquisher, but selecting the right SFC migration pattern depends on users’ motion, applications’ requirements, and MEC nodes’ resources.
5G及以后网络业务功能链迁移模式研究
考虑到需要可靠的网络架构来应对5G网络,3GPP推出了一项令人垂涎的技术,称为5G基于服务的架构(5G- sba)。同时,多接入边缘计算(MEC)与SBA相结合,通过将应用程序托管从集中式数据中心带到网络边缘,更接近消费者和应用程序生成的数据,为最终用户提供了更好的体验。3GPP和ETSI提案都提供了许多好处,特别是提供高度可定制服务的能力。然而,与允许标准虚拟化技术(虚拟机和服务器)托管的大型数据中心相比,MEC节点的特点是计算资源更少,因此出现了基于轻量级微服务的应用程序。由于当前基于微服务的应用程序在支持用户€™移动性方面的不足,并假设所有这些问题都在服务功能链(SFC)迁移的保护下,我们的目标是介绍、解释和评估各种SFC迁移模式。获得的结果表明,没有明确的胜利者,但选择正确的SFC迁移模式取决于用户的€™运动,应用程序的€™需求和MEC节点的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信