Differential diagnosis of stroke and vestibular neuritis in emergency neurology

Q3 Multidisciplinary
A. A. Monak, A. Kulesh, V. Parfenov, P. Astanin
{"title":"Differential diagnosis of stroke and vestibular neuritis in emergency neurology","authors":"A. A. Monak, A. Kulesh, V. Parfenov, P. Astanin","doi":"10.54101/acen.2022.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The differential diagnosis of vertebrobasilar stroke (VBS) and vestibular neuritis (VN) is important challenge for a neurologist when a patient presents to the emergency department with acute vertigo. Current approaches and algorithms of management need to be modified, taking into account clinical practice. \nThe aim of the study was to identify the clinical features of acute vestibular syndrome that are the most helpful in the differential diagnosis of VBS and VN. \nMaterials and methods. We examined 80 emergency admissions to the neurological ward with suspected stroke. A detailed otoneurological examination (including the STANDING and HINTS+ algorithms) and brain imaging (DWI MRI) were performed. \nResults. Out of 80 patients, 26 were diagnosed with VBS, 30 with VN, 11 with vestibular migraine and 2 with Meniere's disease, while the cause of vertigo could not be determined in 11 patients. The most powerful indicator of VBS in the differential diagnosis was gaze-evoked nystagmus, which had a 15.9-fold association with VBS. An increased likelihood of VBS was also associated with unsteadiness (6.3 times), age over 58 years (4.1 times), dysmetria in the finger-to-nose test (3.7 times), adiadochokinesia (3.1 times), and trunk ataxia (3 times). An increased likelihood of VN was associated with a positive unilateral head impulse test (6 times), nystagmus that followed Alexander's law (3.7 times), and presence of nausea (2.5 times). A model was developed for the differential diagnosis of VBS and VNin patients presenting with acute vertigo. The model accuracy was 100% in the validation sample. \nConclusions. Clinical approach remains crucial when differentiating between VBS and VN. The most useful criteria for a differential diagnosis in emergency neurology were the patient's age, the type of nystagmus, head impulse test, and cerebellar dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":36946,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54101/acen.2022.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The differential diagnosis of vertebrobasilar stroke (VBS) and vestibular neuritis (VN) is important challenge for a neurologist when a patient presents to the emergency department with acute vertigo. Current approaches and algorithms of management need to be modified, taking into account clinical practice. The aim of the study was to identify the clinical features of acute vestibular syndrome that are the most helpful in the differential diagnosis of VBS and VN. Materials and methods. We examined 80 emergency admissions to the neurological ward with suspected stroke. A detailed otoneurological examination (including the STANDING and HINTS+ algorithms) and brain imaging (DWI MRI) were performed. Results. Out of 80 patients, 26 were diagnosed with VBS, 30 with VN, 11 with vestibular migraine and 2 with Meniere's disease, while the cause of vertigo could not be determined in 11 patients. The most powerful indicator of VBS in the differential diagnosis was gaze-evoked nystagmus, which had a 15.9-fold association with VBS. An increased likelihood of VBS was also associated with unsteadiness (6.3 times), age over 58 years (4.1 times), dysmetria in the finger-to-nose test (3.7 times), adiadochokinesia (3.1 times), and trunk ataxia (3 times). An increased likelihood of VN was associated with a positive unilateral head impulse test (6 times), nystagmus that followed Alexander's law (3.7 times), and presence of nausea (2.5 times). A model was developed for the differential diagnosis of VBS and VNin patients presenting with acute vertigo. The model accuracy was 100% in the validation sample. Conclusions. Clinical approach remains crucial when differentiating between VBS and VN. The most useful criteria for a differential diagnosis in emergency neurology were the patient's age, the type of nystagmus, head impulse test, and cerebellar dysfunction.
急诊神经内科卒中与前庭神经炎的鉴别诊断
介绍。当急性眩晕患者出现在急诊科时,椎基底卒中(VBS)和前庭神经炎(VN)的鉴别诊断是神经科医生面临的重要挑战。目前的方法和算法的管理需要修改,考虑到临床实践。本研究的目的是确定急性前庭综合征的临床特征,这些特征对VBS和VN的鉴别诊断最有帮助。材料和方法。我们检查了80名疑似中风的神经病房急诊病人。进行详细的耳神经检查(包括STANDING和HINTS+算法)和脑成像(DWI MRI)。结果。在80例患者中,26例被诊断为VBS, 30例被诊断为VN, 11例被诊断为前庭偏头痛,2例被诊断为梅尼埃病,而11例患者的眩晕原因无法确定。在鉴别诊断中,VBS最有力的指标是凝视诱发的眼球震颤,与VBS有15.9倍的相关性。VBS的可能性增加还与不稳定(6.3倍)、年龄超过58岁(4.1倍)、手指到鼻子测试中的测量障碍(3.7倍)、脂肪运动障碍(3.1倍)和躯干共济失调(3倍)相关。VN的可能性增加与单侧头部冲动测试阳性(6次)、亚历山大定律下的眼球震颤(3.7次)和恶心(2.5次)有关。建立了以急性眩晕为表现的VBS和VNin患者的鉴别诊断模型。在验证样本中,模型准确率为100%。结论。临床方法仍然是区分VBS和VN的关键。在急诊神经病学中,鉴别诊断最有用的标准是患者的年龄、眼球震颤的类型、头部冲动试验和小脑功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信