Corneal Biomechanical Evaluation After Conventional Corneal Crosslinking With Oxygen Enrichment.

Jia Wang, Lijun Wang, Zhi-wei Li, Yu Meng Wang, Kai‐di Zhu, Guoying Mu
{"title":"Corneal Biomechanical Evaluation After Conventional Corneal Crosslinking With Oxygen Enrichment.","authors":"Jia Wang, Lijun Wang, Zhi-wei Li, Yu Meng Wang, Kai‐di Zhu, Guoying Mu","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo assess corneal biomechanical changes after conventional corneal crosslinking (CXL), with and without oxygen enrichment.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSixty fresh porcine corneas were randomly divided into group 1 (control), group 2 (conventional CXL), and group 3 (conventional CXL in a high-oxygen environment during ultraviolet A [UVA] irradiation). After crosslinking, a 5-mm wide corneal strip was extracted using a double-bladed knife from 12 to 6'o clock. The Young's modulus of each strip was determined by stress-strain measurements. A comparison between the three groups was performed with a one-way analysis of variance.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAt 4% strain, the Young's modulus of the corneas in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: 0.68±0.20 megapascal (MPa), 1.01±0.23 MPa, and 1.12±0.24 MPa, respectively. The Young's modulus values for groups 2 and 3 showed no statistical significance (P>0.05), However, both groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (P<0.05). At 6% strain, the Young's modulus of the corneas in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: 0.97±0.21, 1.35±0.25, and 1.64±0.44 MPa, respectively, and at 8% strain, the Young's modulus was: 1.29±0.26, 1.72±0.45, 2.20±0.74 MPa, respectively. At 6% and 8% strain, the Young's modulus for the corneas in group 3 was significantly higher than those in both group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIncreasing oxygen concentration during UVA irradiation may improve the efficacy of conventional CXL.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PURPOSE To assess corneal biomechanical changes after conventional corneal crosslinking (CXL), with and without oxygen enrichment. METHODS Sixty fresh porcine corneas were randomly divided into group 1 (control), group 2 (conventional CXL), and group 3 (conventional CXL in a high-oxygen environment during ultraviolet A [UVA] irradiation). After crosslinking, a 5-mm wide corneal strip was extracted using a double-bladed knife from 12 to 6'o clock. The Young's modulus of each strip was determined by stress-strain measurements. A comparison between the three groups was performed with a one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS At 4% strain, the Young's modulus of the corneas in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: 0.68±0.20 megapascal (MPa), 1.01±0.23 MPa, and 1.12±0.24 MPa, respectively. The Young's modulus values for groups 2 and 3 showed no statistical significance (P>0.05), However, both groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than group 1 (P<0.05). At 6% strain, the Young's modulus of the corneas in groups 1, 2, and 3 were: 0.97±0.21, 1.35±0.25, and 1.64±0.44 MPa, respectively, and at 8% strain, the Young's modulus was: 1.29±0.26, 1.72±0.45, 2.20±0.74 MPa, respectively. At 6% and 8% strain, the Young's modulus for the corneas in group 3 was significantly higher than those in both group 1 and group 2 (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Increasing oxygen concentration during UVA irradiation may improve the efficacy of conventional CXL.
常规富氧交联后角膜生物力学评价。
目的观察富氧和不富氧条件下角膜交联(CXL)术后角膜的生物力学变化。方法将60只新鲜猪角膜随机分为高氧环境下UVA照射下的1组(对照组)、2组(常规CXL)和3组(常规CXL)。交联后,从12点到6点用双刃刀取出5毫米宽的角膜条。每个带材的杨氏模量是通过应力应变测量确定的。三组间的比较采用单因素方差分析。结果在4%应变下,1、2、3组角膜杨氏模量分别为:0.68±0.20兆帕斯卡(MPa)、1.01±0.23 MPa、1.12±0.24 MPa。2、3组的杨氏模量值差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),但2、3组均显著高于1组(P<0.05)。在6%应变下,1、2、3组角膜的杨氏模量分别为:0.97±0.21、1.35±0.25、1.64±0.44 MPa;在8%应变下,杨氏模量分别为:1.29±0.26、1.72±0.45、2.20±0.74 MPa。在6%和8%应变下,3组角膜的杨氏模量显著高于1组和2组(P<0.05)。结论UVA照射时增加氧浓度可提高常规CXL的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信