The use of human-computer interaction in libraries: a systematic literature review

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Amjid Khan, Abid Hussain, Muhammad Zareef
{"title":"The use of human-computer interaction in libraries: a systematic literature review","authors":"Amjid Khan, Abid Hussain, Muhammad Zareef","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to analyze the status and application/use of human–computer interaction (HCI) in libraries by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach was used to search Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. The search criteria included research studies published in English language between 2010 and 2021, which were 4,167 citations. Out of 4,167 citations, a total of 50 studies were selected for the final analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed a positive attitude of librarians toward HCI applications in libraries worldwide. The results depict that one-third (30%) of the studies were conducted in the USA, followed by four (8%) studies in China. Out of 50 studies, a portion of 15 (30%) studies were based on digital libraries, followed by seven (14%) studies on academic libraries and five (10%) studies on libraries and their websites. HCI was used for searching and retrieving information, users’ interaction, authentication, online help/support, feedback, library web access, web OPAC, virtual access to resources, indigenous repository and virtual services. The most productive year was 2015, and journal of The Electronic Library had more articles on HCI than other journals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study could assist policymakers and library authorities in reconciling the HCI application in libraries for providing effective and efficient access and services to end-users.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is unique as no comprehensive study has been conducted on the use of HCI in librarianship using the SLR method.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyze the status and application/use of human–computer interaction (HCI) in libraries by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR). Design/methodology/approach A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach was used to search Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. The search criteria included research studies published in English language between 2010 and 2021, which were 4,167 citations. Out of 4,167 citations, a total of 50 studies were selected for the final analysis. Findings The results showed a positive attitude of librarians toward HCI applications in libraries worldwide. The results depict that one-third (30%) of the studies were conducted in the USA, followed by four (8%) studies in China. Out of 50 studies, a portion of 15 (30%) studies were based on digital libraries, followed by seven (14%) studies on academic libraries and five (10%) studies on libraries and their websites. HCI was used for searching and retrieving information, users’ interaction, authentication, online help/support, feedback, library web access, web OPAC, virtual access to resources, indigenous repository and virtual services. The most productive year was 2015, and journal of The Electronic Library had more articles on HCI than other journals. Practical implications The findings of this study could assist policymakers and library authorities in reconciling the HCI application in libraries for providing effective and efficient access and services to end-users. Originality/value This study is unique as no comprehensive study has been conducted on the use of HCI in librarianship using the SLR method.
图书馆中人机交互的应用:系统的文献综述
目的通过系统的文献综述,分析图书馆人机交互(HCI)的现状和应用情况。设计/方法学/方法采用PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)方法对Scopus、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar数据库进行检索。检索标准包括2010年至2021年间用英语发表的研究,共引用4167次。在4167次引用中,总共选择了50项研究进行最终分析。结果表明,全球图书馆馆员对HCI的应用持积极态度。结果显示,三分之一(30%)的研究在美国进行,其次是四项(8%)的研究在中国进行。在50项研究中,有15项(30%)研究是基于数字图书馆的,其次是7项(14%)关于学术图书馆的研究,5项(10%)关于图书馆及其网站的研究。HCI用于信息检索、用户交互、认证、在线帮助/支持、反馈、图书馆web访问、web OPAC、资源虚拟访问、本地资源库和虚拟服务。最高产的年份是2015年,The Electronic Library期刊的HCI文章比其他期刊多。实际意义本研究的结果可以帮助决策者和图书馆当局协调图书馆中HCI的应用,为最终用户提供有效和高效的访问和服务。原创性/价值本研究是独一无二的,因为目前还没有使用SLR方法对图书馆事业中HCI的使用进行过全面的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信