First Thermo-Responsive Polymer Field Evaluation in a High Temperature Reservoir of Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Promising Results for Cost Optimization in a Polymer Project

M. A. Hryc, Daniela Verónica Renta, G. Dupuis, T. Leblanc, Maria Eugenia Peyrebonne Bispe, Mayra Goldman, M. Villambrosa, Gaston Fondevila Sancet
{"title":"First Thermo-Responsive Polymer Field Evaluation in a High Temperature Reservoir of Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Promising Results for Cost Optimization in a Polymer Project","authors":"M. A. Hryc, Daniela Verónica Renta, G. Dupuis, T. Leblanc, Maria Eugenia Peyrebonne Bispe, Mayra Goldman, M. Villambrosa, Gaston Fondevila Sancet","doi":"10.2118/209383-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the results obtained during the first thermo-responsive polymer field evaluation carried out in Pampa del Castillo – La Guitarra field located in Golfo San Jorge basin, Chubut province, Argentina. For the selected reservoir conditions, two thermo-responsive (TR) polymers with the same backbone and different moieties content (TR 1 and TR 2) were designed as alternatives to the conventional HPAM polymer currently injected in the field. TR polymers are aimed to be injected at low concentration and low viscosities under surface conditions and are characterized by an activation temperature. Below this temperature threshold, they behave like regular HPAMs whereas above it they behave like associative polymers. In contrast to HPAMs, higher resistance factors are obtained with increasing temperature beyond the activation threshold, which would be achieved at reservoir conditions.\n TR 1, TR 2 and a selected HPAM were injected in the same well and same layer, under the same conditions during a polymer injectivity test (PIT) in order to compare their performances. The evaluation was done in a multilayer, 80°C - temperature reservoir showing permeabilities around 20 mD. This reservoir had been waterflooded for 32 years before polymer injection started. The test was carried out using a compact polymer injection unit (PIUC) for 60 days involving TR 1, TR 2 and HPAM injection at different concentrations and flow rates, previously defined to target similar mobility reduction (Rm – also called Resistance Factor, ReF) according to coreflood experiences. Fall-off tests were run prior to, during and after polymer injection to assess changes in the well injectivity. Along with the operation, laboratory tests were carried out on site to monitor water and polymer solution parameters.\n TR 1 and TR 2 polymers showed good injectivity, stable rheological properties and good performance during the injection test at all concentration values and flow rates. Well head pressure (WHP) recorded with TR 2 was higher than with TR 1, in accordance with the number of thermo-responsive moieties in each polymer formulation. TR polymers demonstrated to be purely shear-thinning while HPAM showed shear-thickening behavior in near wellbore conditions. These results indicate promising cost reduction that can be achieved through a concentration cut-back of 67%, while sustaining similar resistance factors under reservoir conditions.\n The present article will elaborate on the first results of an injectivity test of thermo-responsive polymer technology conducted in Argentina.","PeriodicalId":10935,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209383-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results obtained during the first thermo-responsive polymer field evaluation carried out in Pampa del Castillo – La Guitarra field located in Golfo San Jorge basin, Chubut province, Argentina. For the selected reservoir conditions, two thermo-responsive (TR) polymers with the same backbone and different moieties content (TR 1 and TR 2) were designed as alternatives to the conventional HPAM polymer currently injected in the field. TR polymers are aimed to be injected at low concentration and low viscosities under surface conditions and are characterized by an activation temperature. Below this temperature threshold, they behave like regular HPAMs whereas above it they behave like associative polymers. In contrast to HPAMs, higher resistance factors are obtained with increasing temperature beyond the activation threshold, which would be achieved at reservoir conditions. TR 1, TR 2 and a selected HPAM were injected in the same well and same layer, under the same conditions during a polymer injectivity test (PIT) in order to compare their performances. The evaluation was done in a multilayer, 80°C - temperature reservoir showing permeabilities around 20 mD. This reservoir had been waterflooded for 32 years before polymer injection started. The test was carried out using a compact polymer injection unit (PIUC) for 60 days involving TR 1, TR 2 and HPAM injection at different concentrations and flow rates, previously defined to target similar mobility reduction (Rm – also called Resistance Factor, ReF) according to coreflood experiences. Fall-off tests were run prior to, during and after polymer injection to assess changes in the well injectivity. Along with the operation, laboratory tests were carried out on site to monitor water and polymer solution parameters. TR 1 and TR 2 polymers showed good injectivity, stable rheological properties and good performance during the injection test at all concentration values and flow rates. Well head pressure (WHP) recorded with TR 2 was higher than with TR 1, in accordance with the number of thermo-responsive moieties in each polymer formulation. TR polymers demonstrated to be purely shear-thinning while HPAM showed shear-thickening behavior in near wellbore conditions. These results indicate promising cost reduction that can be achieved through a concentration cut-back of 67%, while sustaining similar resistance factors under reservoir conditions. The present article will elaborate on the first results of an injectivity test of thermo-responsive polymer technology conducted in Argentina.
阿根廷Golfo San Jorge高温油藏首次热响应聚合物现场评价。聚合物项目成本优化的有希望的结果
本文介绍了在阿根廷Chubut省Golfo San Jorge盆地Pampa del Castillo - La Guitarra油田进行的首次热响应性聚合物油田评价的结果。针对选定的储层条件,设计了两种具有相同主链但不同组分含量的热响应聚合物(TR 1和TR 2),作为目前油田注入的常规HPAM聚合物的替代品。TR聚合物的目标是在表面条件下以低浓度和低粘度注入,并以激活温度为特征。低于这个温度阈值,它们表现得像普通的hpam,而高于这个温度阈值,它们表现得像结合聚合物。与hpam相比,当温度超过激活阈值时,电阻系数会更高,这在油藏条件下可以实现。在聚合物注入测试(PIT)中,在相同的条件下,将TR 1、TR 2和选定的HPAM注入同一井、同一层,以比较它们的性能。该评价是在一个80°C的多层储层中进行的,渗透率约为20md。该储层在开始注入聚合物之前已经水淹了32年。测试使用紧凑型聚合物注射单元(PIUC)进行,为期60天,包括以不同浓度和流速注射TR 1、TR 2和HPAM,根据岩心驱油经验,之前定义的目标是相似的迁移率降低(Rm -也称为阻力系数,ReF)。在注入聚合物之前、期间和之后分别进行了脱落测试,以评估井注入能力的变化。随着操作的进行,在现场进行了实验室测试,以监测水和聚合物溶液的参数。在所有浓度和流量下,tr1和tr2聚合物均表现出良好的注入性、稳定的流变性能和良好的注入性能。根据每种聚合物配方中热响应基团的数量,使用TR 2记录的井口压力(WHP)高于使用TR 1记录的井口压力。在近井条件下,TR聚合物表现出纯粹的剪切减薄行为,而HPAM表现出剪切增厚行为。这些结果表明,通过降低浓度67%,可以实现成本降低,同时在油藏条件下保持相似的阻力系数。本文将详细介绍在阿根廷进行的热敏聚合物技术注入测试的初步结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信