Assessing Post‐ADA Employment: Some Econometric Evidence and Policy Considerations

J. Donohue, M. Stein, Christopher L. Griffin, Jr., Sascha S. Becker
{"title":"Assessing Post‐ADA Employment: Some Econometric Evidence and Policy Considerations","authors":"J. Donohue, M. Stein, Christopher L. Griffin, Jr., Sascha S. Becker","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01217.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we offer innovative analysis and additional evidence on the relationship between the Americans with Disabilities Act (\"ADA\") and the relative labor market outcomes for people with disabilities, the very class protected by its landmark provisions. Using individual-level longitudinal data from 1981 to 1996 derived from the previously unexploited Panel Study of Income Dynamics (\"PSID\"), we examine the possible effect of the ADA on (1) annual weeks worked; (2) annual earnings; and (3) hourly wages for a sample of 7120 unique male household heads between the ages of 21 and 65 as well as a subset of 1147 individuals appearing every year from 1981 to 1996. Our analysis of the larger sample suggests the ADA had a negative impact on the employment levels of disabled persons relative to non-disabled persons but no impact on relative earnings. However, our evaluation of the restricted sample raises questions about these findings. Using these data, we find little evidence of adverse effects on weeks worked but strong evidence of wage declines for the disabled, albeit declines beginning in 1986, well before the ADA's passage. These results therefore cast doubt on the adverse ADA-related impacts found in previous studies, particularly Acemoglu and Angrist (2001). The conflicting narratives that emerge from our analysis shed new light on, but also counsel caution in reaching final conclusions about, the impact of the ADA on employment outcomes for people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":11485,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometrics & Modeling eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01217.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

In this article, we offer innovative analysis and additional evidence on the relationship between the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the relative labor market outcomes for people with disabilities, the very class protected by its landmark provisions. Using individual-level longitudinal data from 1981 to 1996 derived from the previously unexploited Panel Study of Income Dynamics ("PSID"), we examine the possible effect of the ADA on (1) annual weeks worked; (2) annual earnings; and (3) hourly wages for a sample of 7120 unique male household heads between the ages of 21 and 65 as well as a subset of 1147 individuals appearing every year from 1981 to 1996. Our analysis of the larger sample suggests the ADA had a negative impact on the employment levels of disabled persons relative to non-disabled persons but no impact on relative earnings. However, our evaluation of the restricted sample raises questions about these findings. Using these data, we find little evidence of adverse effects on weeks worked but strong evidence of wage declines for the disabled, albeit declines beginning in 1986, well before the ADA's passage. These results therefore cast doubt on the adverse ADA-related impacts found in previous studies, particularly Acemoglu and Angrist (2001). The conflicting narratives that emerge from our analysis shed new light on, but also counsel caution in reaching final conclusions about, the impact of the ADA on employment outcomes for people with disabilities.
评估《美国残疾人法》后的就业:一些计量经济学证据和政策考虑
在本文中,我们对《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)与残疾人的相对劳动力市场结果之间的关系进行了创新分析,并提供了额外的证据,而残疾人正是受其具有里程碑意义的条款保护的群体。利用1981年至1996年的个人纵向数据,我们研究了《美国残疾人法》对(1)年工作周数的可能影响;(二)年度收益;(3) 1981年至1996年,7120名年龄在21岁至65岁之间的男性户主以及每年出现的1147名个体的小时工资。我们对更大样本的分析表明,相对于非残疾人,《美国残疾人法》对残疾人的就业水平有负面影响,但对相对收入没有影响。然而,我们对有限样本的评估对这些发现提出了质疑。通过这些数据,我们发现几乎没有证据表明对工作周的不利影响,但有强有力的证据表明残疾人的工资下降,尽管下降始于1986年,早在《美国残疾人法》通过之前。因此,这些结果对以前的研究,特别是Acemoglu和Angrist(2001)中发现的与ada相关的不利影响提出了质疑。从我们的分析中出现的相互矛盾的叙述为《美国残疾人法》对残疾人就业结果的影响提供了新的线索,但也提醒我们在得出最终结论时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信