INSPECTING THE ROLE OF EMPOWERMENT, OSTRACISM, DEFENSIVE SILENCE AND EMPLOYEE PROACTIVITY WITH RELATION TO EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE

A. Dalain
{"title":"INSPECTING THE ROLE OF EMPOWERMENT, OSTRACISM, DEFENSIVE SILENCE AND EMPLOYEE PROACTIVITY WITH RELATION TO EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE","authors":"A. Dalain","doi":"10.17762/ITII.V9I1.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study attempts to gain insight into what factor influence on employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. Therefore, a theoretical framework is developed grounded in empowerment theory workplace ostracism and defensive silence.  In addition to that the moderating role of employee proactivity is hypothesized between employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: The research design of this study is based on positivist paradigm and followed quantitative research approach. A survey was administered towards public sector organizations in Saudi Arabia. Sample size of this study is computed with prior-power analysis using G-power software. For data analysis 384 responses were analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM). \nFindings: Results indicate that employee creativity is predicted by empowering leadership, psychological empowerment, structural empowerment, trust in leadership, defensive silence and workplace ostracism and explained  52.4% variance in employee creativity. Therefore, employee creativity and employee proactivity shows  55.1% variance in perceived organizational performance. Effect size analysis showed that structural empowerment had medium level of effect size when predicting employee creativity. \nPractical Implications: This study contributes to empowerment theory and enriches the innovative and leadership literature. Practically, this research suggested that managers and policy makers should focus on empowering leadership, structural empowerment, psychological empowerment, employee proactivity and trust in leadership in order to boost employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. \nOriginality/value: This research is significant as it extends the empowerment theory with defensive silence and workplace ostracism and extends the body of knowledge on this subject. To the best of researcher knowledge this study is the first that test the empowerment theory with the moderating role of employee proactivity to determine employee creativity and perceived organizational performance.","PeriodicalId":40759,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology in Industry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17762/ITII.V9I1.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempts to gain insight into what factor influence on employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. Therefore, a theoretical framework is developed grounded in empowerment theory workplace ostracism and defensive silence.  In addition to that the moderating role of employee proactivity is hypothesized between employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research design of this study is based on positivist paradigm and followed quantitative research approach. A survey was administered towards public sector organizations in Saudi Arabia. Sample size of this study is computed with prior-power analysis using G-power software. For data analysis 384 responses were analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings: Results indicate that employee creativity is predicted by empowering leadership, psychological empowerment, structural empowerment, trust in leadership, defensive silence and workplace ostracism and explained  52.4% variance in employee creativity. Therefore, employee creativity and employee proactivity shows  55.1% variance in perceived organizational performance. Effect size analysis showed that structural empowerment had medium level of effect size when predicting employee creativity. Practical Implications: This study contributes to empowerment theory and enriches the innovative and leadership literature. Practically, this research suggested that managers and policy makers should focus on empowering leadership, structural empowerment, psychological empowerment, employee proactivity and trust in leadership in order to boost employee creativity and perceived organizational performance. Originality/value: This research is significant as it extends the empowerment theory with defensive silence and workplace ostracism and extends the body of knowledge on this subject. To the best of researcher knowledge this study is the first that test the empowerment theory with the moderating role of employee proactivity to determine employee creativity and perceived organizational performance.
考察授权、排斥、防御性沉默和员工主动性对员工创造力和组织绩效的作用
目的:本研究试图了解哪些因素影响员工创造力和组织绩效感知。因此,在授权理论的基础上,建立了一个理论框架,工作场所排斥和防御性沉默。此外,假设员工主动性在员工创造力与组织绩效感知之间具有调节作用。设计/方法论/方法:本研究的研究设计基于实证主义范式,遵循定量研究方法。对沙特阿拉伯的公共部门组织进行了一项调查。本研究的样本量采用G-power软件进行先验功率分析计算。数据分析采用结构方程模型(SEM)对384个响应进行分析。结果发现:授权领导、心理授权、结构授权、领导信任、防御性沉默和职场排斥对员工创造力有预测作用,解释了52.4%的员工创造力变异。因此,员工创造力和员工主动性在感知组织绩效中表现出55.1%的方差。效应量分析表明,结构性授权对员工创造力的预测具有中等水平的效应量。实践意义:本研究对授权理论有贡献,丰富了创新与领导力的相关文献。在实践中,本研究建议管理者和决策者应关注授权领导、结构授权、心理授权、员工主动性和对领导的信任,以提高员工的创造力和组织绩效感知。原创性/价值:这项研究很重要,因为它扩展了防御性沉默和工作场所排斥的授权理论,并扩展了这一主题的知识体系。据研究者所知,本研究是第一个测试授权理论与员工主动性的调节作用,以决定员工的创造力和感知组织绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Technology in Industry
Information Technology in Industry COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信