Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcome after Pre Implantation Genetic Diagnosis; Eight Year Experience at King Faisal Specialized Hospital & Research Center

A. Chamsi
{"title":"Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcome after Pre Implantation Genetic Diagnosis; Eight Year Experience at King Faisal Specialized Hospital & Research Center","authors":"A. Chamsi","doi":"10.31579/2578-8965/015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine if there is any observable effect of pre implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) on obstetrical outcome and perinatal morbidity and mortality, birth defects, neonatal outcome in addition, finding the rate of misdiagnosis. Setting: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (Reproductive Medicine & Perinatology Sections) at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Design: A retrospective chart review of PGD patients from Jan 2001- Dec 2009. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 PGD pregnancies and 70 matching spontaneously conceived pregnancies were reviewed. The main outcome measures were rate of multiple pregnancies, gestational age (GA) at delivery, mode of delivery, sex, apgar score (A/S), birth weight, presence of birth defects, misdiagnosis and perinatal and neonatal mortalities. Results: Data were collected from 79 children born after PGD and compared to 72 children born after spontaneous pregnancies. PGD group had significantly more multiple pregnancies. However, there was no statistically significant difference between other outcomes in terms of: birth weight, GA at delivery, sex distribution, perinatal mortality and presence of congenital malformations. The misdiagnosis rate was 1.4%. Conclusion: PGD does not add risk factors to the health of babies born after the procedure. The perinatal death rate and rate of congenital malformations were not higher for PGD group in this study.","PeriodicalId":19413,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if there is any observable effect of pre implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) on obstetrical outcome and perinatal morbidity and mortality, birth defects, neonatal outcome in addition, finding the rate of misdiagnosis. Setting: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (Reproductive Medicine & Perinatology Sections) at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Design: A retrospective chart review of PGD patients from Jan 2001- Dec 2009. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 PGD pregnancies and 70 matching spontaneously conceived pregnancies were reviewed. The main outcome measures were rate of multiple pregnancies, gestational age (GA) at delivery, mode of delivery, sex, apgar score (A/S), birth weight, presence of birth defects, misdiagnosis and perinatal and neonatal mortalities. Results: Data were collected from 79 children born after PGD and compared to 72 children born after spontaneous pregnancies. PGD group had significantly more multiple pregnancies. However, there was no statistically significant difference between other outcomes in terms of: birth weight, GA at delivery, sex distribution, perinatal mortality and presence of congenital malformations. The misdiagnosis rate was 1.4%. Conclusion: PGD does not add risk factors to the health of babies born after the procedure. The perinatal death rate and rate of congenital malformations were not higher for PGD group in this study.
胚胎植入前遗传学诊断后的产科和新生儿结局在费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心工作8年
目的:探讨胚胎植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)对产科结局、围生儿发病率和死亡率、出生缺陷、新生儿结局是否有明显影响,并发现误诊率。地点:沙特阿拉伯利雅得的费萨尔国王专科医院和研究中心(生殖医学和围产期)。设计:对2001年1月至2009年12月PGD患者进行回顾性分析。材料与方法:回顾70例PGD妊娠和70例匹配的自然妊娠。主要结局指标为多胎妊娠率、分娩时胎龄(GA)、分娩方式、性别、apgar评分(A/S)、出生体重、出生缺陷的存在、误诊、围产期和新生儿死亡率。结果:收集了79名PGD后出生的儿童的数据,并与72名自然妊娠后出生的儿童进行了比较。PGD组多胎妊娠明显增多。然而,在出生体重、分娩时GA、性别分布、围产期死亡率和先天性畸形的存在方面,其他结果之间没有统计学上的显著差异。误诊率为1.4%。结论:PGD不会增加术后婴儿健康的危险因素。本研究中PGD组围产儿死亡率和先天性畸形发生率均不高于对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信