Making sense of the digital badging landscape in education and workplace settings: a scoping review of the empirical literature

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Denise M. Cumberland, Tyra G. Deckard, Lisa Kahle-Piasecki, Sharon A. Kerrick, Andrea D. Ellinger
{"title":"Making sense of the digital badging landscape in education and workplace settings: a scoping review of the empirical literature","authors":"Denise M. Cumberland, Tyra G. Deckard, Lisa Kahle-Piasecki, Sharon A. Kerrick, Andrea D. Ellinger","doi":"10.1108/ejtd-06-2022-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe concept of digital badges (DBs) as a form of microcredentialing has gained considerable traction in higher education and workplace settings in recent years. This scoping review aims to map the empirical research conducted on DBs in higher education and workplace settings.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe design of this study is a scoping literature review. This scoping review adopts the five-stage scoping framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley (2005).\n\n\nFindings\nBased upon our review of the 45 studies that comprised this scoping review of the empirical literature on DBs, we advance a typology that segments the empirical research based on whether DBs are used as pedagogical tools (PTs) or microcredentials. The authors found some confusion regarding nomenclature, numerous theories offered to explain DBs and divergent findings that suggest room for further exploration of this relatively new phenomenon.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis scoping review of the literature helps make sense of the emerging research landscape on DBs. The findings suggest that using DBs as a PT or as a microcredential has implications for a wide range of stakeholders regarding promoting lifelong learning, upskilling and reskilling the workforce. With the financial constraints facing higher education in a postpandemic environment, understanding the impact of DBs is needed before making an investment in this arena.\n","PeriodicalId":46786,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Training and Development","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-06-2022-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The concept of digital badges (DBs) as a form of microcredentialing has gained considerable traction in higher education and workplace settings in recent years. This scoping review aims to map the empirical research conducted on DBs in higher education and workplace settings. Design/methodology/approach The design of this study is a scoping literature review. This scoping review adopts the five-stage scoping framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley (2005). Findings Based upon our review of the 45 studies that comprised this scoping review of the empirical literature on DBs, we advance a typology that segments the empirical research based on whether DBs are used as pedagogical tools (PTs) or microcredentials. The authors found some confusion regarding nomenclature, numerous theories offered to explain DBs and divergent findings that suggest room for further exploration of this relatively new phenomenon. Originality/value This scoping review of the literature helps make sense of the emerging research landscape on DBs. The findings suggest that using DBs as a PT or as a microcredential has implications for a wide range of stakeholders regarding promoting lifelong learning, upskilling and reskilling the workforce. With the financial constraints facing higher education in a postpandemic environment, understanding the impact of DBs is needed before making an investment in this arena.
理解教育和工作场所环境中的数字徽章景观:对实证文献的范围审查
近年来,数字徽章(db)作为一种微认证形式的概念在高等教育和工作场所环境中获得了相当大的吸引力。这一范围审查的目的是绘制在高等教育和工作场所设置的db进行的实证研究。设计/方法/方法本研究的设计是一个范围界定的文献综述。本次范围界定审查采用了Arksey和O 'Malley(2005)提出的五阶段范围界定框架。研究结果基于我们对45项研究的回顾,这些研究构成了对db实证文献的范围审查,我们提出了一种类型学,该类型学根据db是被用作教学工具(PTs)还是微证书来划分实证研究。作者发现了一些关于命名的混乱,许多理论提供了解释脑屏障和不同的发现,表明进一步探索这个相对较新的现象的空间。原创性/价值对文献的范围审查有助于理解关于db的新兴研究景观。研究结果表明,在促进终身学习、提高技能和重新培训劳动力方面,将db用作PT或微证书对广泛的利益相关者具有影响。在大流行后的环境中,高等教育面临资金限制,因此,在对这一领域进行投资之前,需要了解db的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信