Linguistic discrimination in pedagogical evaluation. A study of teachers of Hungarian language and literature in Slovakia, Ukraine, Romania and Hungary

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I. Jánk
{"title":"Linguistic discrimination in pedagogical evaluation. A study of teachers of Hungarian language and literature in Slovakia, Ukraine, Romania and Hungary","authors":"I. Jánk","doi":"10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of research on dialect awareness among teachers, particularly in Hungary. The aim of our research was to demonstrate the existence of linguistic discrimination. The research involved more than 502 Hungarian Language and Literature teachers and teacher trainees from Hungary ( N =216), Slo-vakia ( N =128), Romania ( N =108) and Ukraine ( N =50). Data were collected primarily through a technique similar to matched-guise tests; however, the method of the present research had some additional complexity. The large-scale research ( N =502) clearly supported the assumption that linguistic discrimination was widespread in pedagogical evaluation. Oral performances were recorded which varied in content, language variety and code/mode of language use. Oral performances produced in the standard variety or in the elaborated code of language use (or both) were favored. By contrast, oral productions in dialectal and restricted language — despite the fact that their content was correct — received unfavourable evaluation. Linguistic variability in oral productions with the same content resulted in as much as a full grade of difference in the mean of grades. The differences were statistically significant for each sample, hence the prevalence of linguistic discrimination is proved.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2021.21.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a paucity of research on dialect awareness among teachers, particularly in Hungary. The aim of our research was to demonstrate the existence of linguistic discrimination. The research involved more than 502 Hungarian Language and Literature teachers and teacher trainees from Hungary ( N =216), Slo-vakia ( N =128), Romania ( N =108) and Ukraine ( N =50). Data were collected primarily through a technique similar to matched-guise tests; however, the method of the present research had some additional complexity. The large-scale research ( N =502) clearly supported the assumption that linguistic discrimination was widespread in pedagogical evaluation. Oral performances were recorded which varied in content, language variety and code/mode of language use. Oral performances produced in the standard variety or in the elaborated code of language use (or both) were favored. By contrast, oral productions in dialectal and restricted language — despite the fact that their content was correct — received unfavourable evaluation. Linguistic variability in oral productions with the same content resulted in as much as a full grade of difference in the mean of grades. The differences were statistically significant for each sample, hence the prevalence of linguistic discrimination is proved.
教学评价中的语言歧视。斯洛伐克、乌克兰、罗马尼亚和匈牙利匈牙利语言文学教师的研究
关于教师方言意识的研究很少,特别是在匈牙利。我们研究的目的是证明语言歧视的存在。该研究涉及匈牙利(216)、斯洛伐克(128)、罗马尼亚(108)和乌克兰(50)的502多名匈牙利语言文学教师和培训教师。数据主要通过类似于匹配伪装测试的技术收集;然而,本研究的方法有一些额外的复杂性。大规模研究(N =502)明确支持语言歧视在教学评价中普遍存在的假设。口头表演的记录在内容、语言种类和语言使用的代码/模式上各不相同。以标准形式或以精心设计的语言使用代码(或两者兼而有之)产生的口头表演受到青睐。相比之下,方言和限制语言的口头作品——尽管它们的内容是正确的——却得到了不利的评价。在内容相同的口语作品中,语言差异会导致成绩的平均值相差整整一个等级。每个样本的差异具有统计学意义,因此证明了语言歧视的普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信