Financing Common Goods for Health: Core Government Functions in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
D. Peters, Odd N Hanssen, Jose Gutierrez, J. Abrahams, T. Nyenswah
{"title":"Financing Common Goods for Health: Core Government Functions in Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management","authors":"D. Peters, Odd N Hanssen, Jose Gutierrez, J. Abrahams, T. Nyenswah","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2019.1660104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the absence of good data on the costs and comparative benefits from investing in health emergency and disaster risk management (EDRM), governments have been reluctant to invest adequately in systems to reduce the risks and consequences of emergencies and disasters. Yet they spend heavily on their response. We describe a set of key functional areas for investment and action in health EDRM, and calculate the costs needed to establish and operate basic health EDRM services in low- and middle-income countries, focusing on management of epidemics and disasters from natural hazards. We find that health EDRM costs are affordable for most governments. They range from an additional 4.33 USD capital and 4.16 USD annual recurrent costs per capita in low-income countries to 1.35 USD capital to 1.41 USD recurrent costs in upper middle-income countries. These costs pale in comparison to the costs of not acting—the direct and indirect costs of epidemics and other emergencies from natural hazards are more than 20-fold higher. We also examine options for the institutional arrangements needed to design and implement health EDRM. We discuss the need for creating adaptive institutions, strengthening capacities of countries, communities and health systems for managing risks of emergencies, using “all-of-society” and “all-of-state institutions” approaches, and applying lessons about rules and regulations, behavioral norms, and organizational structures to better implement health EDRM. The economic and social value, and the feasibility of institutional options for implementing health EDRM systems should compel governments to invest in these common goods for health that strengthen national health security.","PeriodicalId":46168,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems & Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems & Reform","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1660104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract In the absence of good data on the costs and comparative benefits from investing in health emergency and disaster risk management (EDRM), governments have been reluctant to invest adequately in systems to reduce the risks and consequences of emergencies and disasters. Yet they spend heavily on their response. We describe a set of key functional areas for investment and action in health EDRM, and calculate the costs needed to establish and operate basic health EDRM services in low- and middle-income countries, focusing on management of epidemics and disasters from natural hazards. We find that health EDRM costs are affordable for most governments. They range from an additional 4.33 USD capital and 4.16 USD annual recurrent costs per capita in low-income countries to 1.35 USD capital to 1.41 USD recurrent costs in upper middle-income countries. These costs pale in comparison to the costs of not acting—the direct and indirect costs of epidemics and other emergencies from natural hazards are more than 20-fold higher. We also examine options for the institutional arrangements needed to design and implement health EDRM. We discuss the need for creating adaptive institutions, strengthening capacities of countries, communities and health systems for managing risks of emergencies, using “all-of-society” and “all-of-state institutions” approaches, and applying lessons about rules and regulations, behavioral norms, and organizational structures to better implement health EDRM. The economic and social value, and the feasibility of institutional options for implementing health EDRM systems should compel governments to invest in these common goods for health that strengthen national health security.
资助公共卫生产品:政府在卫生应急和灾害风险管理中的核心职能
由于缺乏关于投资卫生突发事件和灾害风险管理(EDRM)的成本和相对收益的良好数据,各国政府一直不愿对减少突发事件和灾害风险和后果的系统进行充分投资。然而,他们在应对措施上投入了大量资金。我们描述了卫生EDRM投资和行动的一系列关键功能领域,并计算了在低收入和中等收入国家建立和运营基本卫生EDRM服务所需的成本,重点是流行病和自然灾害的管理。我们发现,大多数政府都能负担得起卫生EDRM费用。从低收入国家的人均每年额外4.33美元资本和4.16美元经常性成本到中高收入国家的人均1.35美元资本和1.41美元经常性成本不等。与不采取行动的成本相比,这些成本微不足道——流行病和自然灾害造成的其他紧急情况的直接和间接成本要高出20倍以上。我们还研究了设计和实施卫生EDRM所需的制度安排方案。我们讨论了建立适应性机构的必要性,加强国家、社区和卫生系统管理突发事件风险的能力,采用“全社会”和“全国家机构”的方法,并应用有关规章制度、行为规范和组织结构的经验教训,以更好地实施卫生EDRM。实施卫生EDRM系统的经济和社会价值以及制度选择的可行性应迫使政府投资于这些加强国家卫生安全的卫生共同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信