The influence of the order between resistance and stretching exercises on the hemodynamic response

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
J. Silva, A. Brown, T. M. Gomes, J. Vianna, P. Costa, J. Novaes
{"title":"The influence of the order between resistance and stretching exercises on the hemodynamic response","authors":"J. Silva, A. Brown, T. M. Gomes, J. Vianna, P. Costa, J. Novaes","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.44153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study compared the acute effect of different combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on the heart rate (HR), rate pressure product (RPP) and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) of participants. This is a cross-over methodological design carried out in five visits on non-consecutive days, which always occurred at the same time of day. Twelve trained young men were randomly divided, using counterbalanced and alternate assignments, into three experimental situations: a) horizontal abduction of the shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction before the bench press and leg extension machine, respectively (SS + RT); b) bench press and leg extension machine before horizontal abduction of shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction, respectively (RT + SS); c) bench press and leg extension machine, exclusively (RT). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures showed significant differences in the SS+RT group when the variables were compared at rest (pre) and immediately after the exercises (post): HRpre vs. HRpost (p = 0.000) and RPPpre vs. RPPpost (p = 0.000). In the intergroup comparisons, significant differences were detected between the SS+RT and RT+SS experimental situations exclusively during the post period for the RPP (p = 0.041) and SpO 2 variables (p = 0.002). The combined use of SS and RT significantly changed the intragroup cardiovascular responses by increasing the HR and RPP and decreasing the SpO 2 . However, the values were lower in the intergroup comparisons when the stretching exercises were performed both before and after RT, although no significant differences were found from a cardiovascular safety point of view.","PeriodicalId":42839,"journal":{"name":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.44153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study compared the acute effect of different combinations of resistance training (RT) and static stretching (SS) on the heart rate (HR), rate pressure product (RPP) and oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) of participants. This is a cross-over methodological design carried out in five visits on non-consecutive days, which always occurred at the same time of day. Twelve trained young men were randomly divided, using counterbalanced and alternate assignments, into three experimental situations: a) horizontal abduction of the shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction before the bench press and leg extension machine, respectively (SS + RT); b) bench press and leg extension machine before horizontal abduction of shoulder, knee flexion and hip abduction, respectively (RT + SS); c) bench press and leg extension machine, exclusively (RT). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures showed significant differences in the SS+RT group when the variables were compared at rest (pre) and immediately after the exercises (post): HRpre vs. HRpost (p = 0.000) and RPPpre vs. RPPpost (p = 0.000). In the intergroup comparisons, significant differences were detected between the SS+RT and RT+SS experimental situations exclusively during the post period for the RPP (p = 0.041) and SpO 2 variables (p = 0.002). The combined use of SS and RT significantly changed the intragroup cardiovascular responses by increasing the HR and RPP and decreasing the SpO 2 . However, the values were lower in the intergroup comparisons when the stretching exercises were performed both before and after RT, although no significant differences were found from a cardiovascular safety point of view.
阻力运动和拉伸运动之间的顺序对血流动力学反应的影响
本研究比较了不同组合的阻力训练(RT)和静态拉伸(SS)对参与者心率(HR)、心率压积(RPP)和氧饱和度(spo2)的急性影响。这是一种交叉方法设计,在非连续的日子里进行了五次访问,这些访问总是发生在一天的同一时间。12名受过训练的年轻男性,采用平衡和交替分配的方法,随机分为三种实验情境:a)在卧推和伸腿机前,分别进行肩膀水平外展、膝关节屈曲和髋关节外展(SS + RT);b)水平外展肩、屈膝、髋外展前分别进行卧推、伸腿机训练(RT + SS);c)卧推机和伸腿机,专用(RT)。重复测量的方差分析(ANOVA)显示,在休息(前)和运动后(后)比较变量时,SS+RT组存在显著差异:HRpre vs. HRpost (p = 0.000)和RPPpre vs. RPPpost (p = 0.000)。在组间比较中,RPP (p = 0.041)和SpO 2变量(p = 0.002)在SS+RT和RT+SS实验情况下仅在后期存在显著差异(p = 0.041)。SS和RT联合使用可提高HR和RPP,降低spo2,显著改变组内心血管反应。然而,当在RT之前和之后进行拉伸运动时,组间比较的数值较低,尽管从心血管安全性的角度来看没有发现显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers in Health Sciences, such as Clinical Analyses; Physical Education, Nursing, Pharmacy; Pharmacology, Phoniatry and Audiology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Medicine, Nutrition, Dentistry and Public Health Policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信