Application of LWD Multipole Sonic for Quantitative Cement Evaluation – Well Integrity in the Norwegian Continental Shelf

S. Sarkar, M. Horstmann, Tore Oian, Piotr Byrski, George Lawrence, Mark Gast, M. Cecena, Mohamed Saher Dahroug, K. E. Sylta
{"title":"Application of LWD Multipole Sonic for Quantitative Cement Evaluation – Well Integrity in the Norwegian Continental Shelf","authors":"S. Sarkar, M. Horstmann, Tore Oian, Piotr Byrski, George Lawrence, Mark Gast, M. Cecena, Mohamed Saher Dahroug, K. E. Sylta","doi":"10.4043/31100-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the crucial components of well integrity evaluation in offshore drilling is to determine the cement bond quality assuring proper hydraulic sealing. On the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) an industry standard as informative reference imposes verification of cement length and potential barriers using bonding logs. Traditionally, for the last 50 years, wireline (WL) sonic tools have been extensively used for this purpose. However, the applicability of logging-while-drilling (LWD) sonic tools for quantitative cement evaluation was explored in the recent development drilling campaign on the Dvalin Field in the Norwegian Sea, owing to significant advantages on operational efficiency and tool conveyance in any well trajectory.\n Cement bond evaluation from conventional peak-to-peak amplitude method has shown robust results up to bond indexes of 0.6 for LWD sonic tools. Above this limit, the casing signal is smaller than the collar signal and the amplitude method loses sensitivity to bonding. This practical challenge in the LWD realm was overcome through the inclusion of attenuation rate measurements, which responds accordingly in higher bonding environments. The two methods are used in a hybrid approach providing a full range quantitative bond index (QBI) introduced by Izuhara et al. (2017). In order to conform with local requirements related to well integrity and to ascertain the QBI potential from LWD monopole sonic, a wireline cement bond log (CBL) was acquired in the first well of the campaign for comparison. This enabled the strategic deployment of LWD QBI service in subsequent wells.\n LWD sonic monopole data was acquired at a controlled speed of 900ft/h. The high-fidelity waveforms were analyzed in a suitable time window and both amplitude- and attenuation-based bond indexes were derived. The combined hybrid bond index showed an excellent match with the wireline reference CBL, both in zones of high as well as lower cement bonding. The presence of formation arrivals was also in good correlation with zones of proper bonding distinguishable on the QBI results. This established the robustness of the LWD cement logging and ensured its applicability in the rest of the campaign which was carried out successfully.\n While the results from LWD cement evaluation service are omnidirectional, it comes with a wide range of benefits related to rig cost or conveyance in tough borehole trajectories. Early evaluation of cement quality by LWD sonic tools helps to provide adequate time for taking remedial actions if necessary. The LWD sonic as part of the drilling BHA enables this acquisition and service in non-dedicated runs, with the possibility of multiple passes for observing time-lapse effects. Also, the large sizes of LWD tools relative to the wellbore ensures a lower signal attenuation in the annulus and more effective stabilization, thereby providing a reliable bond index.","PeriodicalId":11072,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, August 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31100-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the crucial components of well integrity evaluation in offshore drilling is to determine the cement bond quality assuring proper hydraulic sealing. On the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) an industry standard as informative reference imposes verification of cement length and potential barriers using bonding logs. Traditionally, for the last 50 years, wireline (WL) sonic tools have been extensively used for this purpose. However, the applicability of logging-while-drilling (LWD) sonic tools for quantitative cement evaluation was explored in the recent development drilling campaign on the Dvalin Field in the Norwegian Sea, owing to significant advantages on operational efficiency and tool conveyance in any well trajectory. Cement bond evaluation from conventional peak-to-peak amplitude method has shown robust results up to bond indexes of 0.6 for LWD sonic tools. Above this limit, the casing signal is smaller than the collar signal and the amplitude method loses sensitivity to bonding. This practical challenge in the LWD realm was overcome through the inclusion of attenuation rate measurements, which responds accordingly in higher bonding environments. The two methods are used in a hybrid approach providing a full range quantitative bond index (QBI) introduced by Izuhara et al. (2017). In order to conform with local requirements related to well integrity and to ascertain the QBI potential from LWD monopole sonic, a wireline cement bond log (CBL) was acquired in the first well of the campaign for comparison. This enabled the strategic deployment of LWD QBI service in subsequent wells. LWD sonic monopole data was acquired at a controlled speed of 900ft/h. The high-fidelity waveforms were analyzed in a suitable time window and both amplitude- and attenuation-based bond indexes were derived. The combined hybrid bond index showed an excellent match with the wireline reference CBL, both in zones of high as well as lower cement bonding. The presence of formation arrivals was also in good correlation with zones of proper bonding distinguishable on the QBI results. This established the robustness of the LWD cement logging and ensured its applicability in the rest of the campaign which was carried out successfully. While the results from LWD cement evaluation service are omnidirectional, it comes with a wide range of benefits related to rig cost or conveyance in tough borehole trajectories. Early evaluation of cement quality by LWD sonic tools helps to provide adequate time for taking remedial actions if necessary. The LWD sonic as part of the drilling BHA enables this acquisition and service in non-dedicated runs, with the possibility of multiple passes for observing time-lapse effects. Also, the large sizes of LWD tools relative to the wellbore ensures a lower signal attenuation in the annulus and more effective stabilization, thereby providing a reliable bond index.
随钻多极声波测井在挪威大陆架固井完整性定量评价中的应用
海上钻井井完整性评价的关键内容之一是确定水泥浆的胶结质量,保证良好的水力密封。在挪威大陆架(NCS),一项行业标准作为信息参考,要求使用胶结测井对水泥长度和潜在障碍进行验证。传统上,在过去的50年里,电缆(WL)声波工具被广泛用于这一目的。然而,随钻测井(LWD)声波工具在定量固井评价中的适用性在最近挪威海Dvalin油田的开发钻井活动中进行了探索,因为它在任何井眼轨迹的操作效率和工具传输方面具有显着优势。传统的峰对峰振幅法评价水泥胶结的结果非常稳定,LWD声波工具的胶结指数高达0.6。超过此限值,套管信号小于接箍信号,振幅法对粘接失去敏感性。通过包含衰减率测量,LWD领域的这一实际挑战得以克服,衰减率测量可以在更高的粘合环境中做出相应的响应。Izuhara等人(2017)采用混合方法,提供全方位定量债券指数(QBI)。为了符合当地对井完整性的要求,并确定随钻单极子声波的QBI潜力,在该作业的第一口井中获取了电缆水泥胶结测井(CBL)进行比较。这使得LWD QBI服务能够在随后的井中进行战略性部署。LWD声波单极子数据在900英尺/小时的控制速度下获得。在合适的时间窗口内分析高保真波形,并推导出基于振幅和衰减的键指数。复合胶结指数与电缆参考CBL非常匹配,无论是在高水泥胶结区域还是在低水泥胶结区域。地层到达的存在也与QBI结果中可区分的适当键合区域具有良好的相关性。这确保了随钻固井测井的稳健性,并确保了其在后续作业中的适用性。虽然LWD固井评估服务的结果是全方位的,但它在复杂井眼轨迹下的钻机成本或运输方面具有广泛的优势。利用随钻测井声波工具对水泥质量进行早期评估,有助于为必要时采取补救措施提供充足的时间。LWD声波作为钻井底部钻具组合的一部分,可以在非专用下入的情况下进行采集和服务,并可以通过多次下入来观察延时效应。此外,相对于井筒而言,LWD工具的大尺寸确保环空信号衰减更小,更有效地稳定,从而提供可靠的粘结指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信