12 Invertebrate Cognition: Nonelemental Learning beyond Simple Conditioning

M. Giurfa
{"title":"12 Invertebrate Cognition: Nonelemental Learning beyond Simple Conditioning","authors":"M. Giurfa","doi":"10.1101/087969819.49.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive science has become fashionable in recent years: A simple search for the word “cognition” in scientific databases will show the extent to which the scientific literature has incorporated a term that 10 years ago was rarely used. From psychological and philosophical studies to neurobiological studies, from modeling and robotics to ethological studies, from ecology to molecular biology, the word cognition can be found almost everywhere, because cognitive science has acquired a new dimension that reflects our growing interest in essential problems like consciousness, brain processing, and the emergence of thinking. Despite this diversity and increasing interest, a general definition for the term cognition remains elusive, probably because the approaches that characterize cognitive studies are diverse and still looking for a synthesis. Indeed, the term cognition may encompass concepts as diverse as human thinking and intelligence, functions leading to the acquisition and generation of meaning in explicit form, and basic perceptual processes (Wullimann and Roth 2001). Broader definitions have been proposed to include processes of acquisition and manipulation of information, attention, perception, decision making, learning, and memory (Shettleworth 1998Shettleworth 2001). In this chapter, I survey the evidence that such concepts can be applied in invertebrates. To provide an operational framework for this survey, I confine the use of the term cognition to complex forms of associative learning. In particular, because the term “complex” is also meaningless if it is not referred to a certain level of simplicity, I focus on nonelemental forms of associative learning —learning forms in which simple,...","PeriodicalId":10493,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","volume":"9 1","pages":"281-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/087969819.49.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Cognitive science has become fashionable in recent years: A simple search for the word “cognition” in scientific databases will show the extent to which the scientific literature has incorporated a term that 10 years ago was rarely used. From psychological and philosophical studies to neurobiological studies, from modeling and robotics to ethological studies, from ecology to molecular biology, the word cognition can be found almost everywhere, because cognitive science has acquired a new dimension that reflects our growing interest in essential problems like consciousness, brain processing, and the emergence of thinking. Despite this diversity and increasing interest, a general definition for the term cognition remains elusive, probably because the approaches that characterize cognitive studies are diverse and still looking for a synthesis. Indeed, the term cognition may encompass concepts as diverse as human thinking and intelligence, functions leading to the acquisition and generation of meaning in explicit form, and basic perceptual processes (Wullimann and Roth 2001). Broader definitions have been proposed to include processes of acquisition and manipulation of information, attention, perception, decision making, learning, and memory (Shettleworth 1998Shettleworth 2001). In this chapter, I survey the evidence that such concepts can be applied in invertebrates. To provide an operational framework for this survey, I confine the use of the term cognition to complex forms of associative learning. In particular, because the term “complex” is also meaningless if it is not referred to a certain level of simplicity, I focus on nonelemental forms of associative learning —learning forms in which simple,...
无脊椎动物认知:超越简单条件反射的非基本学习
近年来,认知科学已经成为一种时尚:在科学数据库中简单地搜索一下“认知”这个词,就会发现科学文献中纳入这个10年前很少使用的术语的程度。从心理学和哲学研究到神经生物学研究,从建模和机器人到行为学研究,从生态学到分子生物学,认知这个词几乎无处不在,因为认知科学已经获得了一个新的维度,反映了我们对意识、大脑处理和思维出现等基本问题日益增长的兴趣。尽管存在这种多样性和日益增长的兴趣,但认知一词的一般定义仍然难以捉摸,这可能是因为表征认知研究的方法多种多样,仍在寻找一个综合。事实上,“认知”一词可能包含各种概念,如人类思维和智力,导致显性形式意义的获取和产生的功能,以及基本的感知过程(Wullimann和Roth 2001)。人们提出了更广泛的定义,包括信息的获取和操作、注意、感知、决策、学习和记忆的过程(Shettleworth 1998 / 2001)。在本章中,我调查了这些概念可以应用于无脊椎动物的证据。为了给这个调查提供一个可操作的框架,我将“认知”一词的使用局限于联想学习的复杂形式。特别是,因为“复杂”一词如果不是指某种程度的简单性,也是没有意义的,所以我把重点放在非基本形式的联想学习上——在这种学习形式中,简单、……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信