Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law

Mihail Poalelungi, Alexander Kurtskhalia
{"title":"Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law","authors":"Mihail Poalelungi, Alexander Kurtskhalia","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2022.2(248).01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thorough resolution of conflicts is impossible not only without removing the objective bases of the conflicting parties’ confrontation, but also without identifying the subjective divergences between the participants in the conflict and the international community participating in its resolution. In this context, the territorial conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia should be seen as political-territorial and international, considering the dynamics of the changing geopolitical interests of the great powers at the regional and continental level. The central figure involved in these territorial conflicts is the Russian Federation, which uses the separatist regimes in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali as a tool to achieve its long-term geopolitical goals in Southwestern Europe – part of the former Soviet Union. Even in the case of a more constructive approach by Moscow to the problems in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, it is impossible to find a super-special status of the separatist regions, the adoption of which would automatically resolve the conflicts.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2022.2(248).01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thorough resolution of conflicts is impossible not only without removing the objective bases of the conflicting parties’ confrontation, but also without identifying the subjective divergences between the participants in the conflict and the international community participating in its resolution. In this context, the territorial conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia should be seen as political-territorial and international, considering the dynamics of the changing geopolitical interests of the great powers at the regional and continental level. The central figure involved in these territorial conflicts is the Russian Federation, which uses the separatist regimes in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali as a tool to achieve its long-term geopolitical goals in Southwestern Europe – part of the former Soviet Union. Even in the case of a more constructive approach by Moscow to the problems in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, it is impossible to find a super-special status of the separatist regions, the adoption of which would automatically resolve the conflicts.
通过国际法的棱镜解决格鲁吉亚领土冲突的战略和战术
彻底解决冲突不仅不消除冲突各方对抗的客观基础,而且不确定冲突参与者与参与解决冲突的国际社会之间的主观分歧,是不可能的。在这种背景下,阿布哈兹和南奥塞梯的领土冲突应被视为政治-领土和国际,考虑到大国在区域和大陆层面不断变化的地缘政治利益的动态。参与这些领土冲突的核心人物是俄罗斯联邦,它利用苏呼米和茨欣瓦利的分离主义政权作为工具,在前苏联的一部分——西南欧洲实现其长期的地缘政治目标。即使莫斯科在阿布哈兹和南奥塞梯问题上采取更具建设性的做法,也不可能为分离主义地区找到一种超级特殊的地位,这种地位的采用将自动解决冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信