THE ECJ’S ERZBERGER RULING: A DOOR WIDELY OPENED TO NATIONAL MODELS OF EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION?

Q3 Social Sciences
V. Šmejkal
{"title":"THE ECJ’S ERZBERGER RULING: A DOOR WIDELY OPENED TO NATIONAL MODELS OF EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION?","authors":"V. Šmejkal","doi":"10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent decision of the Erzberger case C-566/15, the Court of Justice of the European Union had to address the issue of whether the national rules on employee participation in company management (so-called co-determination) are in line with EU law, in particular whether they do not restrict the free movement of workers within the EU internal market. Although in the present case the judges did not find the existence of restrictions, in their brief ruling they did not give answers to all the questions related to this case and the co-determination in multinational business groups. The article attempts to show for which cases of co-determination we already have clear answers in the current EU law and for which we do not. Overall, however, the analysis shows that the EU Court of Justice decision was pragmatic and therefore wise.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent decision of the Erzberger case C-566/15, the Court of Justice of the European Union had to address the issue of whether the national rules on employee participation in company management (so-called co-determination) are in line with EU law, in particular whether they do not restrict the free movement of workers within the EU internal market. Although in the present case the judges did not find the existence of restrictions, in their brief ruling they did not give answers to all the questions related to this case and the co-determination in multinational business groups. The article attempts to show for which cases of co-determination we already have clear answers in the current EU law and for which we do not. Overall, however, the analysis shows that the EU Court of Justice decision was pragmatic and therefore wise.
欧洲法院对埃兹伯格案的裁决:为员工参与的国家模式打开了一扇大门?
在最近的Erzberger案件C-566/15的判决中,欧盟法院必须解决关于员工参与公司管理(所谓的共同决定)的国家规则是否符合欧盟法律的问题,特别是它们是否不限制工人在欧盟内部市场内的自由流动。虽然在本案中,法官没有发现存在限制,但在其简短的裁决中,他们没有回答与本案和跨国商业集团共同决定有关的所有问题。本文试图说明,对于哪些共同决定的案例,我们已经在现行的欧盟法律中有了明确的答案,而对于哪些案例,我们没有明确的答案。然而,总的来说,分析表明,欧盟法院的决定是务实的,因此是明智的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信