Assessing the Potential for Error in Investigating Intraneural Vascularity: A Need for a Standardized Imaging Protocol.

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Buwen Yao, Kevin D Evans, Shawn C Roll
{"title":"Assessing the Potential for Error in Investigating Intraneural Vascularity: A Need for a Standardized Imaging Protocol.","authors":"Buwen Yao, Kevin D Evans, Shawn C Roll","doi":"10.1177/87564793231193396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the implementation of a Doppler sonography imaging protocol to assess intraneural blood flow, within the median nerve, in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 176 participants were examined, and this involved 717 retrospective observations of the images collected. The implemented imaging protocol was assessed, and the data that were collected were cleaned and checked for fidelity and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A large percentage of missing evidence (11%-35%) across proximal, mid, and distal carpal tunnel locations. Only a quarter of cases with evidence of intraneural blood flow had the strongest evidence of a power Doppler video clip, of which only three-quarters were valid. The study identified potential areas for improving the imaging protocol to reduce missing data and improve data quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the significance of a standardized imaging protocol to guide the sonographic acquisition of Doppler images and provides important insights into potential issues with data quality. The recommendations have the potential to help future studies assess intraneural blood flow in healthy populations in a more rigorous and reliable way. Incorporating the study's recommendations into a standardized protocol, there is potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of carpal tunnel syndrome and improve diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38671,"journal":{"name":"Biologie in Unserer Zeit","volume":"6 1","pages":"549-559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10701715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologie in Unserer Zeit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793231193396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the implementation of a Doppler sonography imaging protocol to assess intraneural blood flow, within the median nerve, in healthy individuals.

Materials and methods: A total of 176 participants were examined, and this involved 717 retrospective observations of the images collected. The implemented imaging protocol was assessed, and the data that were collected were cleaned and checked for fidelity and validity.

Results: A large percentage of missing evidence (11%-35%) across proximal, mid, and distal carpal tunnel locations. Only a quarter of cases with evidence of intraneural blood flow had the strongest evidence of a power Doppler video clip, of which only three-quarters were valid. The study identified potential areas for improving the imaging protocol to reduce missing data and improve data quality.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the significance of a standardized imaging protocol to guide the sonographic acquisition of Doppler images and provides important insights into potential issues with data quality. The recommendations have the potential to help future studies assess intraneural blood flow in healthy populations in a more rigorous and reliable way. Incorporating the study's recommendations into a standardized protocol, there is potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of carpal tunnel syndrome and improve diagnosis and treatment.

评估检查硬膜内血管可能出现的误差:制定标准化成像方案的必要性。
研究目的本研究考察了多普勒超声成像方案的实施情况,以评估健康人正中神经内的神经内血流:共对 176 名参与者进行了检查,其中包括对所采集图像的 717 次回顾性观察。对所实施的成像方案进行了评估,并对所收集的数据进行了清理和检查,以确保数据的真实性和有效性:腕管近端、中段和远端位置均有大量证据缺失(11%-35%)。在有硬膜内血流证据的病例中,只有四分之一有最有力的证据,即动力多普勒视频剪辑,其中只有四分之三是有效的。该研究确定了改进成像方案的潜在领域,以减少数据缺失并提高数据质量:本研究证明了标准化成像方案对指导多普勒图像声学采集的重要意义,并对数据质量的潜在问题提出了重要见解。这些建议有望帮助未来的研究以更严格、更可靠的方式评估健康人群的硬膜内血流。将研究建议纳入标准化方案,有可能提高腕管综合征的诊断准确性,改善诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biologie in Unserer Zeit
Biologie in Unserer Zeit Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Die Biologie avanciert im Eiltempo zur zentralen Wissenschaft dieses Jahrhunderts. Biologie in unserer Zeit gibt Einblicke in komplexe Zusammenhänge und Einsichten in das gesamte Spektrum der Biologie. Namhafte Autoren bringen Ihnen die aufregenden Neuentwicklungen näher - auf verständliche Weise und farbig illustriert. In den Rubriken jeder Ausgabe finden Profis und solche, die es werden wollen: - Neuestes aus Forschung und Anwendung - Witziges, Wesentliches und Rätselhaftes - Historisches Hintergrundwissen - Lesenswertes, Berufe, Hinweise zu Fort- und Weiterbildung und vieles mehr.... Begleiten Sie die Autoren von Biologie in unserer Zeit bei der Forschung oder zu seltenen Lebensräumen und Lebensformen. Nutzen Sie die Rubrik „Das Experiment" zum Nachvollziehen spannender Versuche, lernen Sie verschiedene Bioberufe kennen und lassen Sie sich durch Buchbesprechungen zu neuer Lektüre anregen. Biologie in unserer Zeit ist das Verbandsorgan des Verbandes Biologie, Biowissenschaften und Biomedizin in Deutschland e. V. (VBIO)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信