{"title":"Everyone Will Be Jealous For That Mutika","authors":"Grayson Gerrard","doi":"10.1111/J.1835-9310.1989.TB00099.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I describe a phenomenon I refer to by its Aboriginal English name — ‘humbugging’ — in a western Arnhem Land Aboriginal settlement. By discussing the focal object in this phenomenon — the ‘mutika’ (car)1 — I argue that a most interesting process of de-commoditization is occurring in this settlement. \n \n \n \nI use examples of humbugging to illustrate how the car in this community has tremendous symbolic as well as practical significance. I use. in particular, the work of Douglas and Isherwood (1979) and Appadurai et al. (1986), and argue that their ‘social life of things’ theoretical framework is appropriate for interpreting the importance of the ‘mutika’. I also suggest, however, that this framework needs to be re-thought in order to incorporate the challenge which de-commoditization presents to it.","PeriodicalId":85116,"journal":{"name":"Mankind","volume":"6 1","pages":"95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mankind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1835-9310.1989.TB00099.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
In this paper I describe a phenomenon I refer to by its Aboriginal English name — ‘humbugging’ — in a western Arnhem Land Aboriginal settlement. By discussing the focal object in this phenomenon — the ‘mutika’ (car)1 — I argue that a most interesting process of de-commoditization is occurring in this settlement.
I use examples of humbugging to illustrate how the car in this community has tremendous symbolic as well as practical significance. I use. in particular, the work of Douglas and Isherwood (1979) and Appadurai et al. (1986), and argue that their ‘social life of things’ theoretical framework is appropriate for interpreting the importance of the ‘mutika’. I also suggest, however, that this framework needs to be re-thought in order to incorporate the challenge which de-commoditization presents to it.
在这篇文章中,我描述了一种现象,我用它的土著英语名字来称呼它——“humbugging”——发生在阿纳姆地西部的一个土著定居点。通过讨论这一现象的焦点对象——“mutika”(汽车)1,我认为在这一解决方案中正在发生一个最有趣的去商品化过程。我用欺骗的例子来说明汽车在这个社区有巨大的象征意义和现实意义。我使用。特别是Douglas和Isherwood(1979)以及Appadurai et al.(1986)的工作,并认为他们的“事物的社会生活”理论框架适用于解释“mutika”的重要性。然而,我还建议,这个框架需要重新考虑,以便纳入去商品化给它带来的挑战。