GIS-based evolution and comparisons of landslide susceptibility mapping of the East Sikkim Himalaya

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
N. Gupta, S. Pal, J. Das
{"title":"GIS-based evolution and comparisons of landslide susceptibility mapping of the East Sikkim Himalaya","authors":"N. Gupta, S. Pal, J. Das","doi":"10.1080/19475683.2022.2040587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The main sought of this study is to assess the landslide susceptibility map (LSM) of the East Sikkim Himalaya based on the comparative model analysis using frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) with FR (AHP-FR). The models were trained by 166 landslides (70% training) and 12 landslide causative factors whilst tested with the help of 71 landslides (30% testing). Their spatial correlation between the landslides and the causative factors was analysed by using a multicollinearity test. The generated LSM was classified into five classes, i.e. very low, low, moderate, high and very high. In East Sikkim, very high classes of the AHP-FR, LR and FR models cover the area of 11.97%, 11.99% and 7.13%, respectively. The accuracy of prepared LSM was evaluated by using the success rate curve (SRC), prediction rate curve (PRC) and seed calculation area index (SCAI). The area under the curve (AUC) of the success rate curve is 0.88 for the RF model, 0.85 for AHP-FR, 0.78 for LR and 0.79 for FR, whilst the prediction rate curve is 0.86% for the RF model, 0.81 for AHP-FR, 0.79 for LR and 0.78 for FR. The SCAI values of very high susceptibility classes are 0.14, 0.17, 0.18 and 0.19 for the RF, AHP-FR, LR and FR models, respectively. The RF and integrated AHP-FR methods indicate better results as compared to other statistical models.","PeriodicalId":46270,"journal":{"name":"Annals of GIS","volume":"145 1","pages":"359 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of GIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2022.2040587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The main sought of this study is to assess the landslide susceptibility map (LSM) of the East Sikkim Himalaya based on the comparative model analysis using frequency ratio (FR), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) with FR (AHP-FR). The models were trained by 166 landslides (70% training) and 12 landslide causative factors whilst tested with the help of 71 landslides (30% testing). Their spatial correlation between the landslides and the causative factors was analysed by using a multicollinearity test. The generated LSM was classified into five classes, i.e. very low, low, moderate, high and very high. In East Sikkim, very high classes of the AHP-FR, LR and FR models cover the area of 11.97%, 11.99% and 7.13%, respectively. The accuracy of prepared LSM was evaluated by using the success rate curve (SRC), prediction rate curve (PRC) and seed calculation area index (SCAI). The area under the curve (AUC) of the success rate curve is 0.88 for the RF model, 0.85 for AHP-FR, 0.78 for LR and 0.79 for FR, whilst the prediction rate curve is 0.86% for the RF model, 0.81 for AHP-FR, 0.79 for LR and 0.78 for FR. The SCAI values of very high susceptibility classes are 0.14, 0.17, 0.18 and 0.19 for the RF, AHP-FR, LR and FR models, respectively. The RF and integrated AHP-FR methods indicate better results as compared to other statistical models.
基于gis的东锡金喜马拉雅滑坡易感性填图演变与比较
摘要本研究的主要目的是基于频率比(FR)、逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)和层次分析法(AHP)与随机森林分析法(AHP-FR)相结合的比较模型分析,对东锡金喜马拉雅地区的滑坡易感性图(LSM)进行评估。利用166个滑坡(70%)和12个滑坡成因因素对模型进行了训练,并利用71个滑坡(30%)对模型进行了测试。利用多重共线性检验分析了滑坡与成因之间的空间相关性。生成的LSM分为极低、低、中、高和极高五个等级。在东锡金地区,AHP-FR、LR和FR模型的高阶覆盖面积分别为11.97%、11.99%和7.13%。采用成功率曲线(SRC)、预测率曲线(PRC)和种子计算面积指数(SCAI)对制备的LSM的准确性进行评价。RF模型的成功率曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88,AHP-FR为0.85,LR为0.78,FR为0.79,而RF模型的预测率曲线为0.86%,AHP-FR为0.81,LR为0.79,FR为0.78。RF、AHP-FR、LR和FR模型的高敏感性等级SCAI值分别为0.14、0.17、0.18和0.19。与其他统计模型相比,RF和综合AHP-FR方法显示出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of GIS
Annals of GIS Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信