A Review on Deconstruction and Criticism

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Xiaoli Fang
{"title":"A Review on Deconstruction and Criticism","authors":"Xiaoli Fang","doi":"10.1080/25723618.2017.1339515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay is a review on Deconstruction and Criticism. In this book, Bloom explores how strong poets, through misreading, conquer the influence of anxiety from the precursors so as to achieve their uniqueness; Paul de Man discusses how the rhetoric of language governed by trope subverts its fulfillment of a unified meaning; Derrida discusses the problems of the boundary of text, describing the way the text overruns the limits assigned to it. In this way, he redefines the text and extends the boundary of the text; Hartman mainly focuses on the reading experience. He advocates that the writer is also a reader and we should not only talk of reader intrinsically but also historically; Miller’s essay is on the parasitical relationship between deconstructionist reading and “obvious” reading, nihilism and metaphysics, as well as poem and earlier poems. Those critics have their different views on deconstruction and literary criticism; they, however, share some common ideas on the issues of text interpretation, intertextuality as well as the boundary of text.","PeriodicalId":34832,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Literature East West","volume":"64 1","pages":"134 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Literature East West","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2017.1339515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay is a review on Deconstruction and Criticism. In this book, Bloom explores how strong poets, through misreading, conquer the influence of anxiety from the precursors so as to achieve their uniqueness; Paul de Man discusses how the rhetoric of language governed by trope subverts its fulfillment of a unified meaning; Derrida discusses the problems of the boundary of text, describing the way the text overruns the limits assigned to it. In this way, he redefines the text and extends the boundary of the text; Hartman mainly focuses on the reading experience. He advocates that the writer is also a reader and we should not only talk of reader intrinsically but also historically; Miller’s essay is on the parasitical relationship between deconstructionist reading and “obvious” reading, nihilism and metaphysics, as well as poem and earlier poems. Those critics have their different views on deconstruction and literary criticism; they, however, share some common ideas on the issues of text interpretation, intertextuality as well as the boundary of text.
“解构与批评”述评
本文是对解构主义和批评主义的一种回顾。在这本书中,布卢姆探讨了强大的诗人如何通过误读,克服先行者焦虑的影响,从而实现自己的独特性;保罗·德曼讨论了由修辞支配的语言修辞如何颠覆其统一意义的实现;德里达讨论了文本边界的问题,描述了文本如何超越赋予它的界限。这样,他重新定义了文本,扩展了文本的边界;哈特曼主要关注阅读体验。他主张作家也是读者,我们不仅要从本质上谈论读者,还要从历史上谈论读者;米勒的文章是关于解构主义阅读与“明显”阅读、虚无主义与形而上学、诗歌与早期诗歌之间的寄生关系。这些批评家对解构主义和文学批评有不同的看法;然而,他们在文本解释、互文性以及文本边界等问题上有一些共同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Literature East  West
Comparative Literature East West Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信