Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Climatology, Extremes and Flooding Potential over the Continental U.S.

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
E. Mazza, Shuyi S. Chen
{"title":"Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Climatology, Extremes and Flooding Potential over the Continental U.S.","authors":"E. Mazza, Shuyi S. Chen","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-22-0199.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tropical cyclones (TCs) are high-impact events responsible for devastating rainfall and freshwater flooding. Quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) are thus essential to better understand and assess TC impacts. QPEs based on different observing platforms (e.g., satellites, ground-based radars, and rain-gauges), however, may vary substantially and must be systematically compared. The objectives of this study are to 1) compute the TC rainfall climatology, 2) investigate TC rainfall extremes and flooding potential, and 3) compare these fundamental quantities over the continental US across a set of widely-used QPE products. We examine five datasets over an 18-year span (2002-2019). The products include three satellite-based products, CPC MORPHing technique (CMORPH), Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission - Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TRMM-TMPA), the ground-radar and rain-gauge-based NCEP Stage IV, and a state-of-the-art, high-resolution reanalysis (ERA5). TC rainfall is highest along the coastal region, especially in North Carolina, northeast Florida, and in the New Orleans and Houston metropolitan areas. Along the East Coast, TC can contribute up to 20% of the warm-season rainfall and to more than 40% of all daily and 6-hourly extreme rain events. Our analysis shows that the Stage IV detects far higher precipitation rates in landfalling TCs, relative to IMERG, CMORPH, TRMM and ERA5. As a result, satellite- and reanalysis-based QPEs underestimate both the TC rainfall climatology and extreme events, particularly in the coastal region. This uncertainty is further reflected in the TC flooding potential measured by the Extreme Rain Multiplier (ERM) values, whose single-cell maxima are substantially underestimated and misplaced compared to the NCEP Stage IV.","PeriodicalId":15962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-22-0199.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tropical cyclones (TCs) are high-impact events responsible for devastating rainfall and freshwater flooding. Quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) are thus essential to better understand and assess TC impacts. QPEs based on different observing platforms (e.g., satellites, ground-based radars, and rain-gauges), however, may vary substantially and must be systematically compared. The objectives of this study are to 1) compute the TC rainfall climatology, 2) investigate TC rainfall extremes and flooding potential, and 3) compare these fundamental quantities over the continental US across a set of widely-used QPE products. We examine five datasets over an 18-year span (2002-2019). The products include three satellite-based products, CPC MORPHing technique (CMORPH), Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission - Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TRMM-TMPA), the ground-radar and rain-gauge-based NCEP Stage IV, and a state-of-the-art, high-resolution reanalysis (ERA5). TC rainfall is highest along the coastal region, especially in North Carolina, northeast Florida, and in the New Orleans and Houston metropolitan areas. Along the East Coast, TC can contribute up to 20% of the warm-season rainfall and to more than 40% of all daily and 6-hourly extreme rain events. Our analysis shows that the Stage IV detects far higher precipitation rates in landfalling TCs, relative to IMERG, CMORPH, TRMM and ERA5. As a result, satellite- and reanalysis-based QPEs underestimate both the TC rainfall climatology and extreme events, particularly in the coastal region. This uncertainty is further reflected in the TC flooding potential measured by the Extreme Rain Multiplier (ERM) values, whose single-cell maxima are substantially underestimated and misplaced compared to the NCEP Stage IV.
美国大陆热带气旋降雨气候、极端天气和潜在洪水
热带气旋(tc)是造成毁灭性降雨和淡水洪水的高影响事件。因此,定量降水估算(qpe)对于更好地理解和评估TC的影响至关重要。然而,基于不同观测平台(如卫星、地面雷达和雨量计)的qpe可能有很大差异,必须进行系统比较。本研究的目的是1)计算TC降雨气候学,2)调查TC降雨极值和洪水潜力,以及3)通过一组广泛使用的QPE产品比较美国大陆的这些基本量。我们研究了18年(2002-2019)期间的五个数据集。这些产品包括三个基于卫星的产品,CPC MORPHing技术(CMORPH)、GPM综合多卫星检索(IMERG)、热带降雨测量任务-多卫星降水分析(TRMM-TMPA)、基于地面雷达和雨量计的NCEP阶段4,以及最先进的高分辨率再分析(ERA5)。TC降雨在沿海地区最高,特别是在北卡罗来纳州,佛罗里达州东北部,以及新奥尔良和休斯顿大都会地区。在东海岸,TC可以贡献高达20%的暖季降雨,以及超过40%的每日和每6小时极端降雨事件。我们的分析表明,相对于IMERG、CMORPH、TRMM和ERA5,阶段IV检测到登陆tc的降水率要高得多。因此,基于卫星和再分析的qpe低估了TC降雨气候学和极端事件,特别是在沿海地区。这种不确定性进一步反映在极端降雨乘数(ERM)值测量的TC洪水潜力上,与NCEP第四阶段相比,其单细胞最大值被大大低估和错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrometeorology (JHM) (ISSN: 1525-755X; eISSN: 1525-7541) publishes research on modeling, observing, and forecasting processes related to fluxes and storage of water and energy, including interactions with the boundary layer and lower atmosphere, and processes related to precipitation, radiation, and other meteorological inputs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信