The Influence of a Damaged Concrete Cover on the Behavior of a Simply-Supported Beam

Q3 Engineering
K. Shadhan, Bilal Ismaeel Abd Al-Zahra, M. J. Kadhim
{"title":"The Influence of a Damaged Concrete Cover on the Behavior of a Simply-Supported Beam","authors":"K. Shadhan, Bilal Ismaeel Abd Al-Zahra, M. J. Kadhim","doi":"10.28991/cej-2023-09-07-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concrete cover is a part of the concrete that provides the required protection for the reinforcing steel within the required element from external effects. This concrete cover can be damaged for an assortment of reasons, one of which is environmental factors. As a result, this research focused on the effect of worn concrete covering on the structural response of beams. Moreover, the possibility of repairing or replacing this concrete cover with a cement material was done by testing seven beams with the exact dimensions (2700 mm long, 250 mm deep, and 140 mm wide). The first specimen was a control specimen, while in the remaining specimens, a part of the concrete cover was removed in the midspan region with a length of 600 mm and in different formats. The part below the neutral axis (tension zone) was removed in the first two specimens. The part above the neutral axis (the compression zone) was removed in the second two specimens. The whole cover was removed within the specified distance for the other two specimens. In one out of every two of these six specimens, the removed concrete cover was replaced with cementitious material. A flexural test was performed for all specimens, and the conclusion was reached that damaging or removing the concrete cover from the tensile region (below the neutral axis) is less harmful than from the compression region since the beam is often designed as a cracked section. Also, removing the concrete cover from the compression region gives cracks a greater width than removing the concrete cover from the tension region at the same loading level. In the case of replacing the concrete cover with a cementitious one, if the replacement is in the compression zone, it will result in cracks when loading with a width greater than that of the rest of the cases. For specimens that removed their concrete covers from the tension zone, compression zone, and the whole section, the failure loads decreased by 39%, 20%, and 23%, respectively, concerning the control beam. In contrast, all these specimens were repaired with cementitious materials, with an ultimate load capacity approximately equal to the control beams. From these results, any damaged concrete cover for beams in any zone with cementitious materials having high strength and a good bond with old concrete sections can be repaired. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-09 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":53612,"journal":{"name":"Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2023-09-07-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concrete cover is a part of the concrete that provides the required protection for the reinforcing steel within the required element from external effects. This concrete cover can be damaged for an assortment of reasons, one of which is environmental factors. As a result, this research focused on the effect of worn concrete covering on the structural response of beams. Moreover, the possibility of repairing or replacing this concrete cover with a cement material was done by testing seven beams with the exact dimensions (2700 mm long, 250 mm deep, and 140 mm wide). The first specimen was a control specimen, while in the remaining specimens, a part of the concrete cover was removed in the midspan region with a length of 600 mm and in different formats. The part below the neutral axis (tension zone) was removed in the first two specimens. The part above the neutral axis (the compression zone) was removed in the second two specimens. The whole cover was removed within the specified distance for the other two specimens. In one out of every two of these six specimens, the removed concrete cover was replaced with cementitious material. A flexural test was performed for all specimens, and the conclusion was reached that damaging or removing the concrete cover from the tensile region (below the neutral axis) is less harmful than from the compression region since the beam is often designed as a cracked section. Also, removing the concrete cover from the compression region gives cracks a greater width than removing the concrete cover from the tension region at the same loading level. In the case of replacing the concrete cover with a cementitious one, if the replacement is in the compression zone, it will result in cracks when loading with a width greater than that of the rest of the cases. For specimens that removed their concrete covers from the tension zone, compression zone, and the whole section, the failure loads decreased by 39%, 20%, and 23%, respectively, concerning the control beam. In contrast, all these specimens were repaired with cementitious materials, with an ultimate load capacity approximately equal to the control beams. From these results, any damaged concrete cover for beams in any zone with cementitious materials having high strength and a good bond with old concrete sections can be repaired. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-09 Full Text: PDF
混凝土盖板破损对简支梁性能的影响
混凝土覆盖层是混凝土的一部分,为所需构件内的钢筋提供所需的保护,使其免受外部影响。这种混凝土覆盖层可能因各种原因而损坏,其中之一是环境因素。因此,本研究的重点是混凝土覆盖层磨损对梁结构响应的影响。此外,通过测试七根梁的精确尺寸(2700毫米长,250毫米深,140毫米宽),可以修复或用水泥材料替换混凝土覆盖物。第1个试件为对照试件,其余试件均在跨中区域拆除部分长度为600mm且形式不同的混凝土盖板。在前两个试样中,中性轴(张力区)以下的部分被去除。在第二个两个试件中,中性轴上方的部分(压缩区)被移除。另外两个标本在规定的距离内拆除了整个覆盖物。在这六个样本中,每两个样本中就有一个被移除的混凝土覆盖层被胶凝材料取代。对所有试件进行了弯曲试验,得出的结论是,从拉伸区(中性轴以下)破坏或移除混凝土保护层比从压缩区破坏或移除混凝土保护层的危害要小,因为梁通常被设计为有裂缝的截面。同样,在相同荷载水平下,从受压区移除混凝土保护层比从受拉区移除混凝土保护层会产生更大的裂缝宽度。在将混凝土盖板更换为水泥盖板的情况下,如果更换在受压区,则在加载时将产生裂缝,其宽度大于其他情况。当试件从受拉区、受压区和整个截面去除混凝土保护层时,控制梁的破坏荷载分别降低39%、20%和23%。相比之下,所有这些试件都用胶凝材料修复,其极限承载能力近似等于对照梁。从这些结果来看,使用具有高强度且与旧混凝土截面粘结良好的胶凝材料可以修复任何区域梁的混凝土覆盖层。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-09全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Civil Engineering Journal
Open Civil Engineering Journal Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Civil Engineering Journal is an Open Access online journal which publishes research, reviews/mini-reviews, letter articles and guest edited single topic issues in all areas of civil engineering. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in civil engineering. The topics covered in the journal include (but not limited to) concrete structures, construction materials, structural mechanics, soil mechanics, foundation engineering, offshore geotechnics, water resources, hydraulics, horology, coastal engineering, river engineering, ocean modeling, fluid-solid-structure interactions, offshore engineering, marine structures, constructional management and other civil engineering relevant areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信