Analysis of the safety and effectiveness of Lenvatinib + TACE-HAIC + PD-1 inhibitor for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Yun-Qiang Tang, Yuguang Yang, Hui Tang, Cong Mai, Xin Zhang, Jiawen Kuang
{"title":"Analysis of the safety and effectiveness of Lenvatinib + TACE-HAIC + PD-1 inhibitor for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma","authors":"Yun-Qiang Tang, Yuguang Yang, Hui Tang, Cong Mai, Xin Zhang, Jiawen Kuang","doi":"10.2174/1570180820666230601113529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the world.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor + TACE-HAIC (LePTaHAIC) versus Sorafenib + TACE (SorTACE) for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC.\n\n\n\nIn this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with BCLC stage B/C HCC were included. All patients were treated with LePTaHAIC (LePTaHAIC group) or SorTACE (SorTACE group) between September 2019 and September 2020. Outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), conversion surgical resection rate, objective remission rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed and compared between the two treatment modalities.\n\n\n\nIn total, 65 eligible patients were recruited, with 35 assigned to receive LePTaHAIC and 30 assigned to undergo SorTACE. Median PFS (11.4 vs. 5.13 months) and OS (26 vs. 10.08 months) in the LePTaHAIC group were significantly higher compared to the SorTACE group (both P<0.0001). The ORR (mRECIST standard) of the LePTaHAIC group was markedly higher compared to the SorTACE group (71.4% vs. 40%, P=0.01). In the LePTaHAIC group, 11 patients underwent surgical resection (BCLC stage B: n=4, BCLC stage C: n=7) and 3 patients achieved complete pathological remission (pCR), while one patient in the SorTACE group underwent surgical resection. The conversion surgical resection rate of the LePTaHAIC group was significantly higher compared to the SorTACE group [31.4% (11/35) vs. 3.3% (1/30), P=0.004]. Patients with LePTaHAIC had more frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs, especially thrombocytopenia, compared to the SorTACE group (22.9% vs. 3.3%, P=0.02).\n\n\n\nLePTaHAIC exhibited acceptable toxic effects and improved survival compared to SorTACE in intermediate and advanced HCC.\n","PeriodicalId":18063,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Drug Design &amp; Discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Drug Design &amp; Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1570180820666230601113529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the world. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib + PD-1 inhibitor + TACE-HAIC (LePTaHAIC) versus Sorafenib + TACE (SorTACE) for patients with intermediate and advanced HCC. In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with BCLC stage B/C HCC were included. All patients were treated with LePTaHAIC (LePTaHAIC group) or SorTACE (SorTACE group) between September 2019 and September 2020. Outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), conversion surgical resection rate, objective remission rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed and compared between the two treatment modalities. In total, 65 eligible patients were recruited, with 35 assigned to receive LePTaHAIC and 30 assigned to undergo SorTACE. Median PFS (11.4 vs. 5.13 months) and OS (26 vs. 10.08 months) in the LePTaHAIC group were significantly higher compared to the SorTACE group (both P<0.0001). The ORR (mRECIST standard) of the LePTaHAIC group was markedly higher compared to the SorTACE group (71.4% vs. 40%, P=0.01). In the LePTaHAIC group, 11 patients underwent surgical resection (BCLC stage B: n=4, BCLC stage C: n=7) and 3 patients achieved complete pathological remission (pCR), while one patient in the SorTACE group underwent surgical resection. The conversion surgical resection rate of the LePTaHAIC group was significantly higher compared to the SorTACE group [31.4% (11/35) vs. 3.3% (1/30), P=0.004]. Patients with LePTaHAIC had more frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs, especially thrombocytopenia, compared to the SorTACE group (22.9% vs. 3.3%, P=0.02). LePTaHAIC exhibited acceptable toxic effects and improved survival compared to SorTACE in intermediate and advanced HCC.
Lenvatinib + TACE-HAIC + PD-1抑制剂治疗中晚期肝癌的安全性和有效性分析
肝细胞癌(HCC)是世界上第六大常见癌症和第四大癌症死亡原因。本研究旨在探讨Lenvatinib + PD-1抑制剂+ TACE- haic (LePTaHAIC)与Sorafenib + TACE (SorTACE)治疗中晚期HCC患者的疗效和安全性。在这项回顾性研究中,诊断为BCLC期B/C HCC的患者包括在内。所有患者在2019年9月至2020年9月期间接受LePTaHAIC (LePTaHAIC组)或SorTACE (SorTACE组)治疗。结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)、转换手术切除率、客观缓解率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)和治疗相关不良事件(ae)进行分析和比较。总共招募了65名符合条件的患者,其中35名被分配接受LePTaHAIC, 30名被分配接受SorTACE。与SorTACE组相比,LePTaHAIC组的中位PFS(11.4个月对5.13个月)和OS(26个月对10.08个月)显著高于SorTACE组(P均<0.0001)。LePTaHAIC组的ORR (mRECIST标准)明显高于SorTACE组(71.4%比40%,P=0.01)。LePTaHAIC组11例患者手术切除(BCLC B期:n=4, BCLC C期:n=7), 3例患者病理完全缓解(pCR), SorTACE组1例患者手术切除。LePTaHAIC组的转换手术切除率明显高于SorTACE组[31.4%(11/35)比3.3% (1/30),P=0.004]。与SorTACE组相比,LePTaHAIC患者更频繁地发生3-4级治疗相关不良事件,尤其是血小板减少症(22.9% vs. 3.3%, P=0.02)。与SorTACE相比,LePTaHAIC在中晚期HCC中表现出可接受的毒性作用和改善的生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信