Writing in Character: Ethics, Plot, and Emphasis in Samuel Richardson's Clarissa

IF 0.2 2区 文学 N/A LITERATURE
ELH Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1353/elh.2022.0015
Charlotte Roberts
{"title":"Writing in Character: Ethics, Plot, and Emphasis in Samuel Richardson's Clarissa","authors":"Charlotte Roberts","doi":"10.1353/elh.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The opposition between story and instruction set out in the preface to Samuel Richardson's Clarissa establishes a relationship between the novel's moral import and its form, genre, and style. It is a dichotomy that appears to privilege an ethical schema that is ideal, theoretic, and reflective alongside a prose style that is impersonal, emphatic, and also reflective. In this article, I show that the moral economy of the novel is, in fact, quick to display the limitations of departicularized and abstract moral thinking, and that Richardson invites his reader's suspicion of modes of reading and writing that would circumvent the linearity and particularity of story. I conclude by demonstrating that Richardson uses the italic character–particularly in the third edition of the novel–not to stress the maxim-like neutrality of moral truths, but to illuminate the expressive multivalence associated with this typography.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The opposition between story and instruction set out in the preface to Samuel Richardson's Clarissa establishes a relationship between the novel's moral import and its form, genre, and style. It is a dichotomy that appears to privilege an ethical schema that is ideal, theoretic, and reflective alongside a prose style that is impersonal, emphatic, and also reflective. In this article, I show that the moral economy of the novel is, in fact, quick to display the limitations of departicularized and abstract moral thinking, and that Richardson invites his reader's suspicion of modes of reading and writing that would circumvent the linearity and particularity of story. I conclude by demonstrating that Richardson uses the italic character–particularly in the third edition of the novel–not to stress the maxim-like neutrality of moral truths, but to illuminate the expressive multivalence associated with this typography.
写作中的角色:塞缪尔·理查森的《克拉丽莎》中的伦理、情节和重点
摘要:塞缪尔·理查森的小说《克拉丽莎》在前言中提出了故事与教育的对立,建立了小说的道德内涵与其形式、体裁和风格之间的关系。这是一种二分法,它似乎赋予了一种理想的、理论的、反思的伦理模式,以及一种非个人的、强调的、也反思的散文风格。在这篇文章中,我展示了小说的道德经济,事实上,很快就显示出非特殊化和抽象的道德思维的局限性,理查森引起了他的读者对阅读和写作模式的怀疑,这些模式会绕过故事的线性和特殊性。我的结论是,理查森使用斜体字——尤其是在小说的第三版中——不是为了强调道德真理的中立性,而是为了阐明与这种排版相关的表达性的多重价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ELH
ELH LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信