Legal Construction of Isbat Talak According to the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council

P. Paisal, Pirza Adzkia
{"title":"Legal Construction of Isbat Talak According to the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulema Council","authors":"P. Paisal, Pirza Adzkia","doi":"10.32694/qst.v19i2.1084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a discussion of the legal construction of divorce ratification in religious courts, or what can be termed isbat talak, because the norm regarding the ratification of talak does not yet exist, although it has been voiced by various groups, including the Indonesian Ulema Council through the fatwa commission. There are two main points to be discussed in this article. First, regarding the MUI fatwa framework regarding the ratification of divorce. Second, regarding the construction of ratification of divorce in religious courts. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in documentation. The data sources were obtained from the ijtima' results of the MUI Fatwa Commission throughout Indonesia in 2012, the Marriage Law, and the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study shows that the MUI recommendation for divorce outside the court to be recognized as valid by the religious court is in order to find a middle way from debates between groups that rely solely on fiqh and the camp that relies solely on the laws and regulations. The ratification of divorce can basically be done through legal construction by judges with an analogous approach, namely equating the isbat of divorce with the isbat of marriage.","PeriodicalId":33705,"journal":{"name":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlTADIB Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v19i2.1084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a discussion of the legal construction of divorce ratification in religious courts, or what can be termed isbat talak, because the norm regarding the ratification of talak does not yet exist, although it has been voiced by various groups, including the Indonesian Ulema Council through the fatwa commission. There are two main points to be discussed in this article. First, regarding the MUI fatwa framework regarding the ratification of divorce. Second, regarding the construction of ratification of divorce in religious courts. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques in documentation. The data sources were obtained from the ijtima' results of the MUI Fatwa Commission throughout Indonesia in 2012, the Marriage Law, and the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study shows that the MUI recommendation for divorce outside the court to be recognized as valid by the religious court is in order to find a middle way from debates between groups that rely solely on fiqh and the camp that relies solely on the laws and regulations. The ratification of divorce can basically be done through legal construction by judges with an analogous approach, namely equating the isbat of divorce with the isbat of marriage.
从印尼乌里玛委员会法特瓦看伊斯巴特塔拉克语的法律建构
本文讨论了宗教法庭批准离婚的法律结构,或者可以称之为isbat talak,因为关于批准talak的规范尚不存在,尽管它已由各种团体表达,包括印度尼西亚乌里玛委员会通过法特瓦委员会。本文主要讨论两点。首先,关于MUI法特瓦关于批准离婚的框架。第二,关于宗教法庭批准离婚的解释。本研究采用定性方法与文献资料收集技术。数据来源来自2012年印尼全国MUI法特瓦委员会(MUI Fatwa Commission)的调查结果、《婚姻法》和《伊斯兰法汇编》。这项研究表明,MUI建议在法庭外离婚被宗教法庭承认为有效,是为了在完全依赖伊斯兰教法的群体和完全依赖法律法规的阵营之间的辩论中找到一条中间道路。对离婚的认定基本上可以通过法官采取类似的方式进行法律建构,即将离婚isbat等同于婚姻isbat。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信