Time Course of H2 Production Following Oral Lactose Load in Childrenwith and without Lactose Intolerance

S. Maddaluno, M. Esposito, C. Veropalumbo, C. Gentile, I. D. Napoli, M. Caropreso, N. Sannolo, P. Vajro
{"title":"Time Course of H2 Production Following Oral Lactose Load in Childrenwith and without Lactose Intolerance","authors":"S. Maddaluno, M. Esposito, C. Veropalumbo, C. Gentile, I. D. Napoli, M. Caropreso, N. Sannolo, P. Vajro","doi":"10.2174/1874309900903010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To evaluate whether orocoecal transit time (OCTT) might improve the correct allocation (lactose absorb- ers vs malabsorbers) of subjects with \"borderline\" H2 Breath test (H2BT) values ranging 10-20 ppm, and to determine among malabsorbers if OCTT can aid to discern lactose intolerant from tolerant individuals. Patients and Methods: OCTT and increment of H2 levels in breath following a dose of lactose were assessed in 49 chil- dren (mean age 3.3 years; range 0.6-11.0) suspected of lactose malabsorption. A rise > 20 ppm was used as the criterion to separate malabsorbers from absorbers. Results: OCTT averaged 177 ± 40 minutes (mean ± SD) in 14 H2 producing lactose absorbers and 78 ± 39 minutes in 22 lactose malabsorbers (p 75 minutes and no lactose tolerant subject had an OCTT < 75 minutes (sensitivity and specificity 100%; PPV and NPV 100%). Values between 105 and 175 minutes represented a gray area including both absorbers (21%) and all tolerant malabsorb- ers (100%). OCTT longer than 175 minutes excluded lactose malabsorption (sensitivity 100%; specificity 69%; PPV 84%; NPV 100%). In 6 out of 8 cases with borderline H2BT results, OCTT clear cut values were useful to reach the cor- rect diagnostic allocation. Conclusions: OCTT evaluation in addition to considering only H2 concentration is a methodological improvement of H2BT procedure. Although it does not represent an absolute gold standard, OCTT testing may aid in reaching a diagnostic conclusion in some patients where clinical and laboratory features after lactose ingestion remains unclear.","PeriodicalId":89037,"journal":{"name":"The open pediatric medicine journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"13-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open pediatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874309900903010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate whether orocoecal transit time (OCTT) might improve the correct allocation (lactose absorb- ers vs malabsorbers) of subjects with "borderline" H2 Breath test (H2BT) values ranging 10-20 ppm, and to determine among malabsorbers if OCTT can aid to discern lactose intolerant from tolerant individuals. Patients and Methods: OCTT and increment of H2 levels in breath following a dose of lactose were assessed in 49 chil- dren (mean age 3.3 years; range 0.6-11.0) suspected of lactose malabsorption. A rise > 20 ppm was used as the criterion to separate malabsorbers from absorbers. Results: OCTT averaged 177 ± 40 minutes (mean ± SD) in 14 H2 producing lactose absorbers and 78 ± 39 minutes in 22 lactose malabsorbers (p 75 minutes and no lactose tolerant subject had an OCTT < 75 minutes (sensitivity and specificity 100%; PPV and NPV 100%). Values between 105 and 175 minutes represented a gray area including both absorbers (21%) and all tolerant malabsorb- ers (100%). OCTT longer than 175 minutes excluded lactose malabsorption (sensitivity 100%; specificity 69%; PPV 84%; NPV 100%). In 6 out of 8 cases with borderline H2BT results, OCTT clear cut values were useful to reach the cor- rect diagnostic allocation. Conclusions: OCTT evaluation in addition to considering only H2 concentration is a methodological improvement of H2BT procedure. Although it does not represent an absolute gold standard, OCTT testing may aid in reaching a diagnostic conclusion in some patients where clinical and laboratory features after lactose ingestion remains unclear.
有无乳糖不耐症儿童口服乳糖负荷后产氢的时间过程
目的:评估口腔过境时间(OCTT)是否可以改善H2呼气测试(H2BT)值在10-20 ppm范围内的受试者的正确分配(乳糖吸收者与乳糖吸收不良者),并确定在吸收不良者中,OCTT是否有助于区分乳糖不耐受者和乳糖耐受者。患者和方法:对49例儿童(平均年龄3.3岁;范围0.6-11.0)怀疑乳糖吸收不良。以上升> 20ppm作为区分吸收不良剂和吸收剂的标准。结果:14例产H2乳糖吸收者的OCTT平均为177±40分钟(mean±SD), 22例乳糖吸收不良者的OCTT平均为78±39分钟(p = 75分钟),无乳糖耐受者的OCTT < 75分钟(敏感性和特异性均为100%;PPV和NPV 100%)。105至175分钟之间的值代表一个灰色区域,包括吸收者(21%)和所有耐受吸收不良者(100%)。OCTT时间超过175分钟排除乳糖吸收不良(敏感性100%;特异性69%;PPV 84%;NPV 100%)。在8例有边缘性H2BT结果的病例中有6例,OCTT清晰值有助于达到正确的诊断分配。结论:除了仅考虑H2浓度外,OCTT评估是H2BT程序的方法学改进。虽然它不代表绝对的金标准,但OCTT测试可能有助于在一些乳糖摄入后临床和实验室特征尚不清楚的患者中得出诊断结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信