{"title":"Three discourses of American debate (with a glimpse toward a fourth)","authors":"Stephen M. Llano","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2022.2136756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many have attempted to tell the story of debate education in America in a variety of ways. These accounts do more than provide the story, they create the reasons and the nature of debate. In this paper, I consider debate as a discourse that is productive of particular results in both students and understanding of debate by the way we frame and discuss debate education. To do this I rely on Jacques Lacan’s theory of the four discourses in his twenty-third seminar. Through this analysis I find three traditions of teaching debate in America and a suggestion of what a fourth, revolutionary debate pedagogy might look like, one that would meet the results of what most debate teachers and coaches claim they want.","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":"86 1","pages":"249 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2022.2136756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Many have attempted to tell the story of debate education in America in a variety of ways. These accounts do more than provide the story, they create the reasons and the nature of debate. In this paper, I consider debate as a discourse that is productive of particular results in both students and understanding of debate by the way we frame and discuss debate education. To do this I rely on Jacques Lacan’s theory of the four discourses in his twenty-third seminar. Through this analysis I find three traditions of teaching debate in America and a suggestion of what a fourth, revolutionary debate pedagogy might look like, one that would meet the results of what most debate teachers and coaches claim they want.