Determination of silicon dioxide content in bauxite: Comparing the ICP-OES method with the UV-VIS method

G. Ostojic, D. Lazić, Saša Zeljković
{"title":"Determination of silicon dioxide content in bauxite: Comparing the ICP-OES method with the UV-VIS method","authors":"G. Ostojic, D. Lazić, Saša Zeljković","doi":"10.2298/hemind211223007o","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the ICP-OES method (induced coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry) was used to determine the content of silicon dioxide in bauxite, as an important impurity that affects the quality and application of bauxite in alumina production by the Bayer process. Twenty bauxite samples from seven different deposits were analysed. The results were compared with the reference spectrophotometric UV-VIS method. The mean relative difference between the silicon dioxide content determined by the ICP-OES method and the reference method is found to be 4.88 %. Statistical tests were used to assess the comparability of the two methods, followed by a scatter plot, the Bland Altman, Passing-Bablok, and the \"Mountain\" plot. Graphical comparisons generally do not show statistically significant differences between methods. The accuracy and precision of the ICP-OES method were verified by using the standard reference material SRM NIST 697, Dominican Bauxite. Recovery and repeatability values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), are within the acceptance criteria. Based on the t-test, there is a statistically significant difference between the mean value of ICP-OES measurements and the certified value of silicon dioxide, which can be attributed to the effect of systematic error of ICP-OES analysis.","PeriodicalId":9933,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Industry","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/hemind211223007o","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the ICP-OES method (induced coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry) was used to determine the content of silicon dioxide in bauxite, as an important impurity that affects the quality and application of bauxite in alumina production by the Bayer process. Twenty bauxite samples from seven different deposits were analysed. The results were compared with the reference spectrophotometric UV-VIS method. The mean relative difference between the silicon dioxide content determined by the ICP-OES method and the reference method is found to be 4.88 %. Statistical tests were used to assess the comparability of the two methods, followed by a scatter plot, the Bland Altman, Passing-Bablok, and the "Mountain" plot. Graphical comparisons generally do not show statistically significant differences between methods. The accuracy and precision of the ICP-OES method were verified by using the standard reference material SRM NIST 697, Dominican Bauxite. Recovery and repeatability values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), are within the acceptance criteria. Based on the t-test, there is a statistically significant difference between the mean value of ICP-OES measurements and the certified value of silicon dioxide, which can be attributed to the effect of systematic error of ICP-OES analysis.
铝土矿中二氧化硅含量的测定:ICP-OES法与UV-VIS法的比较
本文采用ICP-OES法(诱导耦合等离子体发射光谱法)测定了铝土矿中二氧化硅的含量,二氧化硅是影响铝土矿在拜耳法氧化铝生产中质量和应用的重要杂质。分析了来自7个不同矿床的20个铝土矿样品。结果与参考分光光度法进行了比较。ICP-OES法测定的二氧化硅含量与参考法测定的二氧化硅含量的平均相对差为4.88%。采用统计检验评估两种方法的可比性,然后采用散点图、Bland Altman、Passing-Bablok和“Mountain”图。图形比较通常不会显示不同方法之间的统计学显著差异。采用多米尼加铝土矿SRM NIST 697作为标准对照品,验证了ICP-OES方法的准确度和精密度。以相对标准偏差(RSD)表示的回收率和重复性值在可接受准则范围内。通过t检验,ICP-OES测量的平均值与二氧化硅的认证值之间存在统计学差异,这可归因于ICP-OES分析的系统误差的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信