Positive feedback praising good performance does not alter the learning of an intrinsically motivating task in 10-year-old children

IF 0.5 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
R. Drews, G. Tani, P. Cardozo, Suzete Chiviacowsky
{"title":"Positive feedback praising good performance does not alter the learning of an intrinsically motivating task in 10-year-old children","authors":"R. Drews, G. Tani, P. Cardozo, Suzete Chiviacowsky","doi":"10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have provided evidence for the importance of motivation in motor learning. The present study investigates whether providing positive feedback as statements praising good performance would benefit children’s motor learning when compared to a no-praise condition. Thirty 10-year-old children divided into two groups—positive feedback (PF) and control—learned to ride a pedalo over a seven-meter distance in the shortest time possible. Participants performed 20 practice trials and received feedback on their movement time following each trial. However, only the PF group received feedback acknowledging good performance after each trial block. After 24 hours, both groups performed learning tests without any feedback. Questionnaires (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory) were applied to measure participants’ motivational levels. The results show substantial improvements in performance during practice and high levels of intrinsic motivation, sustained across days, in both groups. Differences between groups in motivation, performance, and learning were not found. These results demonstrate that riding a pedalo in the shortest time possible constitutes an intrinsically motivating task in children, whose learning is not altered by the provision of positive feedback statements acknowledging good performance, possibly by a motivational ceiling effect. The findings indicate that task-inherent motivational characteristics can moderate positive feedback learning effects in children. Future studies could measure other motivational constructs, such as learner’s persistence in practicing the task, or could include post-failure measures that may reveal differences in children’s capacity to cope with errors. Differences between groups would demonstrate potential benefits of providing positive feedback praising performance in children that were not captured in the present experiment, even on the learning of inherently motivating tasks.","PeriodicalId":36150,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Human Movement","volume":"43 1","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Human Movement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21134/EURJHM.2020.45.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several studies have provided evidence for the importance of motivation in motor learning. The present study investigates whether providing positive feedback as statements praising good performance would benefit children’s motor learning when compared to a no-praise condition. Thirty 10-year-old children divided into two groups—positive feedback (PF) and control—learned to ride a pedalo over a seven-meter distance in the shortest time possible. Participants performed 20 practice trials and received feedback on their movement time following each trial. However, only the PF group received feedback acknowledging good performance after each trial block. After 24 hours, both groups performed learning tests without any feedback. Questionnaires (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory) were applied to measure participants’ motivational levels. The results show substantial improvements in performance during practice and high levels of intrinsic motivation, sustained across days, in both groups. Differences between groups in motivation, performance, and learning were not found. These results demonstrate that riding a pedalo in the shortest time possible constitutes an intrinsically motivating task in children, whose learning is not altered by the provision of positive feedback statements acknowledging good performance, possibly by a motivational ceiling effect. The findings indicate that task-inherent motivational characteristics can moderate positive feedback learning effects in children. Future studies could measure other motivational constructs, such as learner’s persistence in practicing the task, or could include post-failure measures that may reveal differences in children’s capacity to cope with errors. Differences between groups would demonstrate potential benefits of providing positive feedback praising performance in children that were not captured in the present experiment, even on the learning of inherently motivating tasks.
表扬良好表现的积极反馈不会改变10岁儿童对内在激励任务的学习
一些研究已经为动机在运动学习中的重要性提供了证据。本研究探讨了与没有表扬的情况相比,给予表扬表现好的积极反馈是否有利于儿童的运动学习。30名10岁的儿童被分成两组——积极反馈组和控制组——学习在尽可能短的时间内骑上7米的距离。参与者进行了20次练习试验,并在每次试验后收到关于他们运动时间的反馈。然而,只有PF组在每个试验块后获得了承认良好表现的反馈。24小时后,两组在没有任何反馈的情况下进行学习测试。采用问卷(内在动机量表)测量被试的动机水平。结果显示,在练习过程中,两组人的表现都有了实质性的提高,内在动力水平也很高,而且持续了好几天。各组之间在动机、表现和学习方面没有发现差异。这些结果表明,在尽可能短的时间内骑踏板对儿童来说是一项内在的激励任务,他们的学习不会因为提供积极的反馈声明而改变,这可能是由于动机天花板效应。研究结果表明,任务内在动机特征可以调节儿童的正反馈学习效应。未来的研究可以测量其他动机结构,比如学习者在练习任务时的坚持,或者可以包括失败后的测量,这些测量可能会揭示儿童应对错误能力的差异。小组之间的差异将证明,提供积极的反馈来表扬孩子的表现,甚至是在学习具有内在动机的任务时,可能会有潜在的好处,这些反馈在本实验中没有被捕捉到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Human Movement
European Journal of Human Movement Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信