Chronotype, Shift Work, and Sleep Problems Among Emergency Medicine Clinicians

E. Hirsh, T. Britt, Zachary Klinefelter, Justine Liptak, C. Meyers, Katie Daniels, L. Fowler
{"title":"Chronotype, Shift Work, and Sleep Problems Among Emergency Medicine Clinicians","authors":"E. Hirsh, T. Britt, Zachary Klinefelter, Justine Liptak, C. Meyers, Katie Daniels, L. Fowler","doi":"10.55504/2578-9333.1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Extensive research has demonstrated that shift work can be detrimental to sleep. Chronotype, the preference for time of day to sleep or be active, can influence how we function at different times of day and how shift work impacts us. This study was designed to assess the chronotype of emergency physicians (EPs) and emergency advanced practice providers (EAPPs) and examine how chronotype was related to sleep problems and shifts worked over a three-month period. Methods : A survey assessing chronotype and sleep quality was sent to 225 EPs and EAPPs in a single, large academic Department of Emergency Medicine. An archival database indicated the shifts worked during the prior three months and the percentages of day, evening, and night shifts for each practitioner were calculated. Results : 127 people completed the survey (56.4%). Of the three chronotypes (morning, intermediate, eve-ning), most EM clinicians were categorized as intermediate chronotype (56/127, 44.1%), followed by morning type (39/127, 30.7%) and then evening type (32/127, 25.2%). Those with an evening chronotype were more likely to report daytime dysfunction (a lack of enthusiasm and propensity to fall asleep during activities) (p < 0.01) and worked a greater percentage of night shifts than other chronotypes (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the effect of evening chronotype on daytime dysfunction was no longer significant when controlled for the rela-tively greater percentage of night shifts worked, suggesting that the observed dysfunction was more likely an artifact of the night shifts worked, rather than purely chronotype driven. Conclusion : This is the first study of a large cohort of EM practitioners investigating chronotype and its influence on shift preference and sleep quality. In this pilot investigation, most of the surveyed clinicians were categorized as an intermediate chronotype. Working night shifts was associated more closely with daytime dysfunction than was chronotype, strengthening the latent literature that working night shift carries with it significant challenges to the EM clinician. Future research should evaluate the relationship between chronotype malalignment to practitioner burnout and well-being. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":90738,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of health, wellness & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55504/2578-9333.1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Extensive research has demonstrated that shift work can be detrimental to sleep. Chronotype, the preference for time of day to sleep or be active, can influence how we function at different times of day and how shift work impacts us. This study was designed to assess the chronotype of emergency physicians (EPs) and emergency advanced practice providers (EAPPs) and examine how chronotype was related to sleep problems and shifts worked over a three-month period. Methods : A survey assessing chronotype and sleep quality was sent to 225 EPs and EAPPs in a single, large academic Department of Emergency Medicine. An archival database indicated the shifts worked during the prior three months and the percentages of day, evening, and night shifts for each practitioner were calculated. Results : 127 people completed the survey (56.4%). Of the three chronotypes (morning, intermediate, eve-ning), most EM clinicians were categorized as intermediate chronotype (56/127, 44.1%), followed by morning type (39/127, 30.7%) and then evening type (32/127, 25.2%). Those with an evening chronotype were more likely to report daytime dysfunction (a lack of enthusiasm and propensity to fall asleep during activities) (p < 0.01) and worked a greater percentage of night shifts than other chronotypes (p < 0.05). Interestingly, the effect of evening chronotype on daytime dysfunction was no longer significant when controlled for the rela-tively greater percentage of night shifts worked, suggesting that the observed dysfunction was more likely an artifact of the night shifts worked, rather than purely chronotype driven. Conclusion : This is the first study of a large cohort of EM practitioners investigating chronotype and its influence on shift preference and sleep quality. In this pilot investigation, most of the surveyed clinicians were categorized as an intermediate chronotype. Working night shifts was associated more closely with daytime dysfunction than was chronotype, strengthening the latent literature that working night shift carries with it significant challenges to the EM clinician. Future research should evaluate the relationship between chronotype malalignment to practitioner burnout and well-being. ABSTRACT
急诊临床医生的睡眠类型、轮班工作和睡眠问题
大量研究表明,轮班工作会对睡眠有害。睡眠类型,即对一天中睡觉或活动时间的偏好,会影响我们在一天中不同时间的运作方式,以及轮班工作对我们的影响。本研究旨在评估急诊医生(EPs)和急诊高级执业医师(EAPPs)的睡眠类型,并在三个月的时间内研究睡眠类型与睡眠问题和轮班工作之间的关系。方法:将一份评估睡眠类型和睡眠质量的调查问卷发送给单个大型学术急诊科的225名EPs和EAPPs。档案数据库显示了前三个月的班次,并计算了每个从业者的白班,夜班和夜班的百分比。结果:共127人(56.4%)完成调查。在3种睡眠类型(早晨、中间、晚上)中,大多数临床医生属于中间睡眠类型(56/127,44.1%),其次是早晨睡眠类型(39/127,30.7%),最后是晚上睡眠类型(32/127,25.2%)。与其他睡眠类型的人相比,晚上睡眠类型的人更有可能报告白天功能障碍(缺乏热情和在活动中入睡的倾向)(p < 0.01),夜班工作的比例更高(p < 0.05)。有趣的是,当夜班工作的比例相对较高时,夜间睡眠类型对白天功能障碍的影响不再显著,这表明观察到的功能障碍更可能是夜班工作的产物,而不是纯粹的睡眠类型驱动。结论:这是首次对EM从业者进行大规模队列研究,调查睡眠类型及其对轮班偏好和睡眠质量的影响。在这项试点调查中,大多数被调查的临床医生被归类为中间时型。夜班工作与白天功能障碍的关系比睡眠类型更密切,这加强了潜在的文献,夜班工作对EM临床医生带来了重大挑战。未来的研究应评估时间类型失调与从业人员职业倦怠和幸福感之间的关系。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书