Clinical Setting Differences in Third-Year Medical Students’ Perceptions of “Ownership”

Elena A Wood, T. Wyatt, Sarah Egan
{"title":"Clinical Setting Differences in Third-Year Medical Students’ Perceptions of “Ownership”","authors":"Elena A Wood, T. Wyatt, Sarah Egan","doi":"10.24926/JRMC.V1I5.1462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ownership in clinical settings is a construct that be described as feelings of responsibility and accountability towards a patient, which has potential implications for patient safety and care. Researchers were interested in examining differences in students' perception of ownership across main and regional campuses. The purpose of this study is to assess third-year students' perception of \"ownership\" during their clerkship rotations in different clinical settings. Items from a validated instrument on psychological ownership were adopted to suit a clinical environment. Scores on each of the sub-scales of: a) Territoriality, b) Accountability, c) Self-efficacy, d) Belongingness, and e) Self-Identification were calculated by averaging the items. The survey was administered to 233 third-year medical students multiple times throughout the academic year. Responses from regional campus or community provider settings were compared to the main campus. To examine students' psychological ownership scores in different clinical settings, analysis of variance (ANOVA), was performed. A Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison procedure was used to examine post hoc pair-wise differences between two clinical settings. We received 265 of responses from 95 of responders. There were no statistically significant differences between campuses for Territoriality scores. On Self-Efficacy, Accountability, Self-Identification and Belongingness scales other community providers and regional campuses had significantly higher scores than main campus (p<0.05). Follow up ANOVA analysis were performed for all scales on individual items resulting in 1/5 for Accountability, 2/6 on Self-Efficacy, 5/5 on Belongingness, and 6/7 for Self-Identification been statistically significant. \n Ownership is considered an important aspect of patient care, patient safety, professional identity formation, etc., yet researchers have not examined how clinical settings impact students' perceptions of patient ownership during their clerkship years. Our study is the first step to operationalize and conceptualize ownership, its development over time, and differences in clinical experiences. \n  \nNone of the authors has a conflict of interest. This study was approved by our institution’s Institutional Review Board.","PeriodicalId":92811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of regional medical campuses","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of regional medical campuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/JRMC.V1I5.1462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Ownership in clinical settings is a construct that be described as feelings of responsibility and accountability towards a patient, which has potential implications for patient safety and care. Researchers were interested in examining differences in students' perception of ownership across main and regional campuses. The purpose of this study is to assess third-year students' perception of "ownership" during their clerkship rotations in different clinical settings. Items from a validated instrument on psychological ownership were adopted to suit a clinical environment. Scores on each of the sub-scales of: a) Territoriality, b) Accountability, c) Self-efficacy, d) Belongingness, and e) Self-Identification were calculated by averaging the items. The survey was administered to 233 third-year medical students multiple times throughout the academic year. Responses from regional campus or community provider settings were compared to the main campus. To examine students' psychological ownership scores in different clinical settings, analysis of variance (ANOVA), was performed. A Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison procedure was used to examine post hoc pair-wise differences between two clinical settings. We received 265 of responses from 95 of responders. There were no statistically significant differences between campuses for Territoriality scores. On Self-Efficacy, Accountability, Self-Identification and Belongingness scales other community providers and regional campuses had significantly higher scores than main campus (p<0.05). Follow up ANOVA analysis were performed for all scales on individual items resulting in 1/5 for Accountability, 2/6 on Self-Efficacy, 5/5 on Belongingness, and 6/7 for Self-Identification been statistically significant. Ownership is considered an important aspect of patient care, patient safety, professional identity formation, etc., yet researchers have not examined how clinical settings impact students' perceptions of patient ownership during their clerkship years. Our study is the first step to operationalize and conceptualize ownership, its development over time, and differences in clinical experiences.   None of the authors has a conflict of interest. This study was approved by our institution’s Institutional Review Board.
医三学生“所有权”认知的临床环境差异
临床环境中的所有权是一种结构,被描述为对患者的责任感和问责感,这对患者安全和护理具有潜在的影响。研究人员感兴趣的是检查学生在主校区和地区校区对所有权的看法的差异。本研究的目的是评估三年级学生在不同的临床实习环境中对“所有权”的感知。为了适应临床环境,我们采用了心理所有权量表中的项目。a)领土性,b)问责性,c)自我效能,d)归属感和e)自我认同的每个子量表的得分通过平均项目来计算。这项调查是在整个学年多次对233名医学生进行的。区域校区或社区提供者设置的反应与主校区进行了比较。采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验不同临床环境下学生的心理所有权得分。Tukey-Kramer多重比较程序用于检查两种临床设置之间的事后两两差异。我们收到了95位应答者的265条回复。校园之间的领土性得分没有统计学上的显著差异。在自我效能感、问责性、自我认同和归属感量表上,其他社区服务提供者和区域校区得分显著高于主校区(p<0.05)。对所有量表的单项进行方差分析,其中问责性为1/5,自我效能为2/6,归属感为5/5,自我认同为6/7,具有统计学意义。所有权被认为是病人护理、病人安全、职业身份形成等的重要方面,但研究人员尚未研究临床环境如何影响学生在实习期间对病人所有权的看法。我们的研究是操作化和概念化所有权的第一步,它随时间的发展,以及临床经验的差异。所有作者都没有利益冲突。本研究得到了我们机构审查委员会的批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信