Sutureless trabeculectomy as a substitute for conventional trabeculectomy in the management of primary open angle glaucoma

A. Madan, M. Vyawahare, Samreen Ayubi
{"title":"Sutureless trabeculectomy as a substitute for conventional trabeculectomy in the management of primary open angle glaucoma","authors":"A. Madan, M. Vyawahare, Samreen Ayubi","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I9.4393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of sutureless punch trabeculectomy, as a substitute for conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy, in the management of primary open angle glaucoma.Materials and methods: In a prospective, randomized study, 40 eyes of 40 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), who were candidates of trabeculectomy were included and randomly assigned into two groups, conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy (A) or sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy (B). Assessment of intraoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure, antiglaucoma medications used and postoperative complications were followed for a period of 6 months.Results: The mean preoperative IOP in the conventional group was 26.7 3.010 mm Hg and in the sutureless group was 26.6 3.067 mm Hg. The mean reduction in IOP in the conventional group after 6 months was 12.4 0.350 mm Hg and in the sutureless group was 12.3 0.407 mm Hg. The complete success rate in Group A was 55% and in Group B was 50%.No significant difference in complication rate was noted between the two groups.Conclusion: It was seen that the sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy has efficacy and safety comparable to conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy and hence can be used as a substitute for conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"351-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I9.4393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of sutureless punch trabeculectomy, as a substitute for conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy, in the management of primary open angle glaucoma.Materials and methods: In a prospective, randomized study, 40 eyes of 40 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), who were candidates of trabeculectomy were included and randomly assigned into two groups, conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy (A) or sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy (B). Assessment of intraoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure, antiglaucoma medications used and postoperative complications were followed for a period of 6 months.Results: The mean preoperative IOP in the conventional group was 26.7 3.010 mm Hg and in the sutureless group was 26.6 3.067 mm Hg. The mean reduction in IOP in the conventional group after 6 months was 12.4 0.350 mm Hg and in the sutureless group was 12.3 0.407 mm Hg. The complete success rate in Group A was 55% and in Group B was 50%.No significant difference in complication rate was noted between the two groups.Conclusion: It was seen that the sutureless scleral tunnel trabeculectomy has efficacy and safety comparable to conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy and hence can be used as a substitute for conventional scleral flap trabeculectomy.
无缝合线小梁切除术替代传统小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼
目的:评价无缝线打孔小梁切除术替代常规巩膜瓣小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:在一项前瞻性、随机研究中,40例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者,作为小梁切除术的候选患者,纳入40只眼,随机分为常规巩膜瓣小梁切除术(a组)和无缝合线巩膜隧道小梁切除术(B组)两组。随访6个月,评估术中并发症和术后视力、眼压、使用的抗青光眼药物和术后并发症。结果:常规组术前平均IOP为26.7 3.010 mm Hg,未缝合组术前平均IOP为26.6 3.067 mm Hg,常规组术后6个月平均IOP下降12.4 0.350 mm Hg,未缝合组平均IOP下降12.3 0.407 mm Hg, A组手术完全成功率为55%,B组手术完全成功率为50%。两组并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:无缝合线巩膜隧道小梁切除术的疗效和安全性与常规巩膜瓣小梁切除术相当,可作为常规巩膜瓣小梁切除术的替代术式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信