Caregiver Perceptions of Child Participation in Sensory Friendly Community Events

Kelle DeBoth PhD, OTR/L, Madalynn Wendland PT, DPT, Tyler Bilinovic MOT, OTR/L, Chelsea Sanford MOT, OTR/L
{"title":"Caregiver Perceptions of Child Participation in Sensory Friendly Community Events","authors":"Kelle DeBoth PhD, OTR/L, Madalynn Wendland PT, DPT, Tyler Bilinovic MOT, OTR/L, Chelsea Sanford MOT, OTR/L","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2020.1862729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Children with disabilities, such as those with sensory processing differences or motor impairments, often have limited opportunities for community participation. Moreover, the degree to which caregivers perceive community spaces to be accessible and appropriate for their children can be a determining influence. This study evaluated caregiver perceptions of a “sensory friendly” event led by an urban university in partnership with a local children’s museum. Caregivers completed post-event surveys over a 12-month period. A total of 10 surveys (29% response rate) were completed, and questions were combined into a priori categories of interest for comparison. Results indicate that caregivers perceived child participation as significantly more favorable than many other aspects and interactions occurring during the event. In addition, mobility supports were significantly more favorable than modified sensory activities. Findings suggest that positive perceptions of child engagement in a modified community environment can decrease barriers to participation, however more research is warranted.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"55 1","pages":"291 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2020.1862729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Children with disabilities, such as those with sensory processing differences or motor impairments, often have limited opportunities for community participation. Moreover, the degree to which caregivers perceive community spaces to be accessible and appropriate for their children can be a determining influence. This study evaluated caregiver perceptions of a “sensory friendly” event led by an urban university in partnership with a local children’s museum. Caregivers completed post-event surveys over a 12-month period. A total of 10 surveys (29% response rate) were completed, and questions were combined into a priori categories of interest for comparison. Results indicate that caregivers perceived child participation as significantly more favorable than many other aspects and interactions occurring during the event. In addition, mobility supports were significantly more favorable than modified sensory activities. Findings suggest that positive perceptions of child engagement in a modified community environment can decrease barriers to participation, however more research is warranted.
照顾者对儿童参与感官友好社区活动的认知
残疾儿童,如那些有感觉加工差异或运动障碍的儿童,往往有有限的机会参与社区活动。此外,照料者认为社区空间对其子女开放和适宜的程度可能是一个决定性的影响。这项研究评估了看护者对一所城市大学与当地儿童博物馆合作举办的“感官友好”活动的看法。护理人员在12个月内完成了事件后调查。总共完成了10项调查(29%的回复率),并将问题组合成一个先验的兴趣类别进行比较。结果表明,照顾者认为儿童的参与比事件中发生的许多其他方面和互动明显更有利。此外,运动支持明显优于改良的感觉活动。研究结果表明,在改进的社区环境中,对儿童参与的积极看法可以减少参与的障碍,但需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信