Participation in and Benefits of Community Forest Management: Learning from Cases in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Ngo Duc Tung, Sakai Tetsuro, Mori Kazuyuki, M. Kei
{"title":"Participation in and Benefits of Community Forest Management: Learning from Cases in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam","authors":"Ngo Duc Tung, Sakai Tetsuro, Mori Kazuyuki, M. Kei","doi":"10.4157/GEOGREVJAPANB.85.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore local participation in relation to benefits in community forest management (CFM) in Thua Thien Hue province, central Vietnam, and to clarify the potential and challenges of sustainable forest management. Focusing on structural perspectives, the actor’s perspective, benefit flows, and benefit sharing in communities, this study examines the factors that shape the possibilities and constraints of local participation and benefits under models of forest management by household groups and by village communities. The findings reveal a gap between participation and benefit policies and CFM practices. CFM is an initiative approach that includes secure and substantial property rights, and the advantage of developing local institutional arrangements. It has encouraged local people to participate in forest protection and management activities, as well as improved opportunities for communities to benefit from forest resources. Moreover, creating timber benefit-sharing mechanisms based on certain numbers of trees in each diameter class has advantages over a system based on timber reserves. However, the overall benefits of CFM are still not considered to be significant by local communities. Transparency, effective participation, and accountability in terms of good internal governance were found to be weak. Additionally, it is challenging to motivate villager participation in forest protection and development activities because of the poor quality of allocated forest areas and the high percentage of poor households in communities. Communities lacked assistance and support from relevant stakeholders and thus had little power to solve critical situations such as treating violators, covering the costs of forest management and protection activities, and building forest enrichment and livelihood models. Therefore, to achieve a sustainable CFM model, an integrated approach is needed that considers whether a community forest reflects community values and produces benefits. key words community forest management, participation, structure perspective, actor’s perspective, benefit flow, benefit sharing, Vietnam","PeriodicalId":40646,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Review of Japan-Series B","volume":"4 1","pages":"39-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Review of Japan-Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4157/GEOGREVJAPANB.85.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to explore local participation in relation to benefits in community forest management (CFM) in Thua Thien Hue province, central Vietnam, and to clarify the potential and challenges of sustainable forest management. Focusing on structural perspectives, the actor’s perspective, benefit flows, and benefit sharing in communities, this study examines the factors that shape the possibilities and constraints of local participation and benefits under models of forest management by household groups and by village communities. The findings reveal a gap between participation and benefit policies and CFM practices. CFM is an initiative approach that includes secure and substantial property rights, and the advantage of developing local institutional arrangements. It has encouraged local people to participate in forest protection and management activities, as well as improved opportunities for communities to benefit from forest resources. Moreover, creating timber benefit-sharing mechanisms based on certain numbers of trees in each diameter class has advantages over a system based on timber reserves. However, the overall benefits of CFM are still not considered to be significant by local communities. Transparency, effective participation, and accountability in terms of good internal governance were found to be weak. Additionally, it is challenging to motivate villager participation in forest protection and development activities because of the poor quality of allocated forest areas and the high percentage of poor households in communities. Communities lacked assistance and support from relevant stakeholders and thus had little power to solve critical situations such as treating violators, covering the costs of forest management and protection activities, and building forest enrichment and livelihood models. Therefore, to achieve a sustainable CFM model, an integrated approach is needed that considers whether a community forest reflects community values and produces benefits. key words community forest management, participation, structure perspective, actor’s perspective, benefit flow, benefit sharing, Vietnam
社区森林管理的参与和收益:从越南化天顺化省的案例中学习
本研究旨在探讨越南中部化天顺化省当地参与社区森林管理(CFM)的相关利益,并阐明可持续森林管理的潜力和挑战。本研究以结构视角、行动者视角、利益流动和社区利益分享为重点,考察了在家庭群体和村庄社区森林管理模式下,影响当地参与和利益的可能性和制约因素。研究结果揭示了参与和福利政策与CFM实践之间的差距。CFM是一种主动的方法,包括有保障和实质性的产权,以及发展地方制度安排的优势。它鼓励当地人民参与森林保护和管理活动,并改善社区从森林资源中受益的机会。此外,建立以每一种径级树木的一定数量为基础的木材利益分享机制比以木材储量为基础的系统更有优势。然而,当地社区仍然认为CFM的总体效益并不显著。在良好的内部治理方面,透明度、有效参与和问责制被认为是薄弱的。此外,调动村民参与森林保护和发展活动也是一项挑战,因为分配的林区质量很差,社区中贫困家庭的比例很高。社区缺乏相关利益攸关方的援助和支持,因此在处理违法者、支付森林管理和保护活动的成本、建立森林致富和生计模式等关键问题上几乎没有能力解决。因此,为了实现可持续的CFM模式,需要一种综合的方法,考虑社区森林是否反映了社区价值并产生了效益。关键词社区森林经营,参与,结构视角,行动者视角,利益流动,利益分享,越南
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信