Wellbore Cleanness Under Total Losses in Horizontal Wells: The Field Study

A. Ruzhnikov, E. Echevarria
{"title":"Wellbore Cleanness Under Total Losses in Horizontal Wells: The Field Study","authors":"A. Ruzhnikov, E. Echevarria","doi":"10.2118/207952-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the Middle East many of the matured fields have fractured or vugular formations where the drilling is continued without return to a surface. This situation has been commonly interpreted as lack of hole cleaning and high risk of stuck pipe. The manuscript describes a study performed to analyze the hole cleaning while blind drilling horizontal sections.\n Most of the losses while drilling across fractured or vugular formations happen sudden, and this represents a risk of formation instability and stuck pipe. Additionally, the cuttings accumulation may lead to a potential pack off. To understand the hole cleaning the annular pressure while drilling was introduced in different sections, what via change of the equivalent static and dynamic densities describes the cutting and cavings accumulation in the annulus. Additionally, the hole cleaning behavior with different fluids pumped through the drillstring (i.e. drilling fluid, water, water with sweeps) was studied.\n The proposed study was performed in 4 different fields, 9 wells, across horizontal 6⅛-in. sections with total lost circulation. It was identified that while drilling with full returns ECD vs ESD variations are within 1.5 ppg, those variations are matching with the modeling of hydraulics. Once total losses encountered the variations between ECD and ESD are very low - within 0.2 ppg - indicating that annular friction losses below the loss circulation zone are minimal. This support the theory that all the drilled cuttings are properly lifted from bottom and carried to the karst into the loss circulation zone and not fluctuating above the loss zone. Additionally, minor to no relation found in hole cleaning while drilling with mud or a water with sweeps. This finding also is aligned with the stuck pipe statistics that shows higher incidents of stuck pipe while drilling the with full circulation due to pack off.\n The manuscript confirms the theory of the hole cleaning in total lost circulation and application of different hole cleaning practices to improve it. The results of the study can be implemented in any project worldwide.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207952-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Middle East many of the matured fields have fractured or vugular formations where the drilling is continued without return to a surface. This situation has been commonly interpreted as lack of hole cleaning and high risk of stuck pipe. The manuscript describes a study performed to analyze the hole cleaning while blind drilling horizontal sections. Most of the losses while drilling across fractured or vugular formations happen sudden, and this represents a risk of formation instability and stuck pipe. Additionally, the cuttings accumulation may lead to a potential pack off. To understand the hole cleaning the annular pressure while drilling was introduced in different sections, what via change of the equivalent static and dynamic densities describes the cutting and cavings accumulation in the annulus. Additionally, the hole cleaning behavior with different fluids pumped through the drillstring (i.e. drilling fluid, water, water with sweeps) was studied. The proposed study was performed in 4 different fields, 9 wells, across horizontal 6⅛-in. sections with total lost circulation. It was identified that while drilling with full returns ECD vs ESD variations are within 1.5 ppg, those variations are matching with the modeling of hydraulics. Once total losses encountered the variations between ECD and ESD are very low - within 0.2 ppg - indicating that annular friction losses below the loss circulation zone are minimal. This support the theory that all the drilled cuttings are properly lifted from bottom and carried to the karst into the loss circulation zone and not fluctuating above the loss zone. Additionally, minor to no relation found in hole cleaning while drilling with mud or a water with sweeps. This finding also is aligned with the stuck pipe statistics that shows higher incidents of stuck pipe while drilling the with full circulation due to pack off. The manuscript confirms the theory of the hole cleaning in total lost circulation and application of different hole cleaning practices to improve it. The results of the study can be implemented in any project worldwide.
水平井全漏失条件下井筒清洁度的现场研究
在中东,许多成熟油田都有裂缝或空穴地层,在这些地层中,钻井工作无需返回地面即可继续进行。这种情况通常被解释为缺乏井眼清洁和高卡管风险。该手稿描述了一项研究,以分析盲钻水平段时的孔清洗。在裂缝或空穴地层中钻井时,大多数漏失都是突然发生的,这意味着地层不稳定和钻杆卡钻的风险。此外,岩屑堆积可能会导致潜在的封隔。为了了解井眼清洁情况,在不同的钻井段引入了环空压力,通过等效静态和动态密度的变化来描述环空中的切割和落洞积聚。此外,研究了通过钻柱泵入的不同流体(即钻井液、水、带扫水的水)对井眼的清洗行为。该研究在4个不同的油田、9口6⅛-in水平井中进行。全失循环段。结果表明,在全回采钻井过程中,ECD与ESD的变化在1.5 ppg以内,这些变化与水力学模型相匹配。一旦遇到总损耗,ECD和ESD之间的变化非常低,在0.2 ppg以内,这表明在漏失循环区域以下的环空摩擦损耗最小。这支持了所有钻出的岩屑都被适当地从底部提起并携带到岩溶中进入损失循环带,而不是在损失带上方波动的理论。此外,在使用泥浆或水清洗井眼时,几乎没有发现这种关系。这一发现也与卡钻统计数据相一致,该数据显示,由于封隔,在全循环钻井过程中,卡钻的发生率更高。本文证实了全漏失井眼清洗的理论,并应用了不同的井眼清洗方法来改进它。研究结果可以在世界范围内的任何项目中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信